Migraine
Migraine - Summary
Migraine is a primary episodic headache disorder. It is characterized by episodic severe headaches with associated symptoms such as photophobia, phonophobia, and nausea and vomiting. The most common subtypes of migraine are migraine without aura an migraine with aura.
Migraine is a complex condition, and the exact pathophysiological cause is not fully understood. It has a significant genetic component, with about half of people with migraine having a first-degree relative with the condition.
The prevalence of migraine differs between the sexes, being about three times more common in women (18%, mean onset of age 18 years) than men (6%, mean onset of age 14 years).
In adults, migraine without aura is diagnosed when at least five attacks fulfil the following criteria:
Headache lasts 4–72 hours.
At least two of the following characteristics are present: unilateral location, moderate or severe pain intensity, pulsating quality, aggravation by routine physical activity.
At least one of the following is present: nausea or vomiting, photophobia or phonophobia.
In adults, migraine with aura (reported by about one third of people with migraine) are diagnosed when:
There are two or more attacks with one or more symptoms of aura including visual or sensory symptoms, or as dysphasic speech disturbance.
Symptoms of aura last less than 60 minutes.
Other conditions may present with signs and symptoms similar to migraine. These may be an alternative form of primary headache disorder (such a cluster headache or tension-type headache), or a secondary cause, which may be serious and life-threatening.
A headache diary may be useful to identify potential triggers (such as stress, specific foods, dehydration, missed meals), which can be managed a appropriate.
First-line treatment of acute migraine consists of analgesia (paracetamol, aspirin, or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) and (especially if nausea is present) anti-emetics (prochlorperazine, domperidone, or metoclopramide). Second-line treatment with a triptan may be required if first-line treatment is inadequate.
When two or more triptans have been trialled unsuccessfully, or treatment is successful but attacks are frequent, preventive treatment such as beta-blockers, amitriptyline, or anticonvulsants is often used.
Hospitalisation or urgent referral is only necessary if a serious cause of headache is suspected, or if the person is in severe, uncontrolled status migrainosus (migraine lasting for more than 72 hours).
Have I got the right topic?
This CKS topic is based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache [BASH, 2007].
This CKS topic covers the primary care management of migraine in adults and children.
This CKS topic does not cover the management of other primary headaches (e.g. tension and medication-overuse headaches), secondary headaches (e.g. meningitis), or complications of migraine (e.g. status migrainosus).
There are separate CKS topics on Headache - assessment, Headache - cluster, Headache - medication overuse, Headache - tension-type, and Trigeminal neuralgia; there is also a referral guideline, published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, for Brain tumour - suspected.
The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in England, and providing first contact or primary health care.
How up-to-date is this topic?
How up-to-date is this topic?
Changes
February 2013 — minor update. The 2013 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic [NICE, 2013].
November 2012 — minor update. The links to the electronic medicines website (www.medicines.org.uk) have been updated.
January 2012 — minor update. McNeil Products Ltd, in collaboration with the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), has published new safety data regarding the association of domperidone with an increased risk of serious ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death [McNeil Products Ltd and Winthrop Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd, 2011]. This topic has been updated to reflect their advice on dosing, adverse effects, and drug interactions. Issued in February 2012.
July 2011 — minor update. More exact paracetamol dosing for children has been introduced by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency [MHRA, 2011]. Prescriptions have been updated to reflect the revised dosing. Issued in July 2011.
May 2011 — minor update. The 2010/2011 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic [NPC, 2011]. Issued in June 2011.
October 2010 — topic structure revised to ensure consistency across CKS topics — no changes to clinical recommendations have been made.
March 2010 — minor update. Advice from the NICE guideline Depression in adults with a chronic physical health problem regarding drug interactions between antidepressants and triptans has been added [NICE, 2009c]. Issued in March 2010.
July to December 2008 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence.
The scope of this CKS topic has been expanded to cover the management of children with migraine. Prescriptions for topiramate have been removed as this would be initiated by a specialist.
Previous changes
September 2008 — minor correction to Changes section. Issued in September 2008.
July 2006 — updated. Topiramate is now licensed for the prophylaxis of migraine in adults and prescriptions have been added for use under specialist supervision. Issued in July 2006.
January 2006 — minor update. Black triangle removed from almotriptan. Issued in February 2006.
October 2005 — minor technical update. Issued in November 2005.
July 2005 — updated text discussing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the Medicines management and Prescribing points sections. Issued in July 2005.
January 2005 — rewritten. Validated in March 2005 and issued in April 2005.
December 2001 — rewritten. Validated in March 2002 and issued in April 2002.
September 1998 — written.
Update
New evidence
Evidence-based guidelines
Guidelines published since the last revision of this topic:
Evers, S., Afra, J., Frese, A., et al. (2009) EFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine: revised report of an EFNS task force. European Journal of Neurology16(9), 968-981. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Holland, S., Silberstein, S.D., Freitag, F., et al. (2012) Evidence-based guideline update: NSAIDs and other complementary treatments for episodic migraine prevention in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Headache Society. Neurology78(17), 1346-1353. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
NICE (2012) Botulinum toxin type A for the prevention of headaches in adults with chronic migraine (NICE technology appraisal). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
Pringsheim, T., Davenport, W., Mackie, G., et al. (2012) Canadian Headache Society guideline for migraine prophylaxis. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences39(2 suppl 2), S1-S59. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)
No new HTAs since 1 August 2008.
Economic appraisals
No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 August 2008.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Systematic reviews published since the last revision of this topic:
Abu-Arafeh, I., Razak, S., Sivaraman, B. and Graham, C. (2010) Prevalence of headache and migraine in children and adolescents: a systematic review of population-based studies. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology52(12), 1088-1897. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Bonfert, M. Straube, A., Schroeder, A.S., et al. (2013) Primary headache in children and adolescents: update on pharmacotherapy of migraine and tension-type headache. Neuropediatrics44(1), 3-19. [Abstract]
Butera, G., Biondi-Zoccai, G.G., Carminati, M., et al. (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of currently available evidence on migraine and patent foramen ovale percutaneous closure: Much ado about nothing? Catheterization & Cardiovascular Interventions75(4), 494-504. [Abstract]
Chaibi, A., Tuchin, P.J., and Russell, M.B. (2011) Manual therapies for migraine: a systematic review. Journal of Headache Pain12(2), 127-133. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Derry, C.J., Derry, S., and Moore, R.A. (2012) Sumatriptan (intranasal route of administration) for acute migraine attacks in adults (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 2. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
Derry, C.J., Derry, S., and Moore, R.A. (2012) Sumatriptan (oral route of administration) for acute migraine attacks in adults (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 2. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
Derry, C.J., Derry, S., and Moore, R.A. (2012) Sumatriptan (rectal route of administration) for acute migraine attacks in adults(Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 2. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
Derry, C.J., Derry, S., and Moore, R.A. (2012) Sumatriptan (subcutaneous route of administration) for acute migraine attacks in adults (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 2. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
Derry, S., Moore, R.A., and McQuay, H.J. (2010) Paracetamol (acetaminophen) with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 11. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
Derry, S., Rabbie, R., and Moore, R.A. (2012) Diclofenac with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 2. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
Dimitrova, A.K., Ungaro, R.C., Lebwohl, B., et al. (2012) Prevalence of migraine in patients with celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease. Headacheepub ahead of print. [Abstract]
Friedman, B.W., Kapoor, A., Friedman, M.S., et al. (2008) The relative efficacy of meperidine for the treatment of acute migraine: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Annals of Emergency Medicine52(6), 705-713. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Jackson, J.L., Kuriyama, A., and Hayashino, Y. (2012) Botulinum toxin A for prophylactic treatment of migraine and tension headaches in adults. JAMA307(16), 1736-1745. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Kelly, A.M., Walcynski, T., and Gunn, B. (2009) The relative efficacy of phenothiazines for the treatment of acute migraine: a meta-analysis. Headache49(9), 1324-1332. [Abstract]
Kirthi, V., Derry, S., Moore, R.A. and McQuay, H.J. (2010) Aspirin with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults(Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 4. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
Lanteri-Minet, M., Duru, G., Mudge, M. and Cottrell, S. (2011) Quality of life impairment, disability and economic burden associated with chronic daily headache, focusing on chronic migraine with or without medication overuse: a systematic review. Cephalalgia31(7), 837-850. [Abstract]
Linde, K., Allais, G., Brinkhaus, B., et al. (2009) Acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 1. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
Natoli, J., Manack, A., Dean, B., et al. (2009) Global prevalence of chronic migraine: a systematic review. Cephalagia30(5), 599-609. [Abstract]
Posadzki, P. and Ernst, E. (2011) Spinal manipulations for the treatment of migraine: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Cephalalgia31(8), 964-970. [Abstract]
Rabbie, R., Derry, S., Moore, R., and McQuay, H.J. (2010) Ibuprofen with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 10. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
Singh, A., Alter, H.J., and Zaia, B. (2008) Does the addition of dexamethasone to standard therapy for acute migraine headache decrease the incidence of recurrent headache for patients treated in the emergency department? A meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Academic Emergency Medicine15(12), 1223-1233. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Schürks, M., Rist, P.M., Bigal, M.E. et al. (2009) Migraine and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ339, b3914. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Shuhendler, A.J., Lee, S., Siu, M., et al. (2009) Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine headaches: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Pharmacotherapy29(7), 784-791. [Abstract]
Sun, H., Bastings, E., Temeck, J., et al. (2013) Migraine therapeutics in adolescents: a systematic analysis and historic perspectives of triptan trials in adolescents. JAMA Pediatricsepub ahead of print. [Abstract]
Primary evidence
Randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic:
Dodick, D.W., Turkel, C.C., Degryse, R.E., et al. (2010) OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache50(6), 921-936. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Haghighi, A.B., Motazedian, S., Rezaii, R. et al. (2010) Cutaneous application of menthol 10% solution as an abortive treatment of migraine without aura: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossed-over study. International Journal of Clinical Practice64(4), 451-456. [Abstract]
Holroyd, K.A., Cottrell, C.K., O'Donnell, F.J., et al. (2010) Effect of preventive (β blocker) treatment, behavioural migraine management, or their combination on outcomes of optimised acute treatment in frequent migraine: randomised controlled trial. BMJ341, c4871. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Lewis, D., Winner, P., Saper, J., et al. (2009) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate for migraine prevention in pediatric subjects 12 to 17 years of age. Pediatrics123(3), 924-934. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Li, Y., Liang, F., Yang, X., et al. (2009) Acupuncture for treating acute attacks of migraine: a randomized controlled trial. Headache49(6), 805-816. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Observational studies published since the last revision of this topic:
Bushnell, C.D., Jamison, M., and James, A.H. (2009) Migraines during pregnancy linked to stroke and vascular diseases: US population based case-control study. BMJ338, b664. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Gudmundsson, L.S., Scher, A.I., Aspelund, T., et al. (2010) Migraine with aura and risk of cardiovascular and all cause mortality in men and women: prospective cohort study. BMJ341, c3966. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Kurth, T., Kase, C.S., Schurks, M., et al. (2010) Migraine and risk of haemorrhagic stroke in women: prospective cohort study. BMJ341, c3659. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Kurth, T., Schurks, M., Logroscino, G., and Buring, J.E. (2009) Migraine frequency and risk of cardiovascular disease in women. Neurology73(8), 581-588. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Rist, P.M., Kang, J.H., Buring, J.E., et al. (2012) Migraine and cognitive decline among women: prospective cohort study. BMJ345, e5027. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Scher, A.I., Gudmundsson, L.S., Sigurdsson, S., et al. (2009) Migraine headache in middle age and late-life infarcts. Journal of the American Medical Association301(24), 2563-2570. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
A comment on publication-bias of sumatriptan studies has been published since the last revision of this topic.
Tfelt-Hansen, P.C. (2009) Unpublished clinical trials with sumatriptan. Lancet374(9700), 1501-1502.
New policies
No new national policies or guidelines since 1 August 2008.
New safety alerts
Domperidone
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in collaboration with McNeil Products Ltd., and Winthrop Pharmaceuticals have issued new information regarding the cardiac risks associated with domperidone.
The new advice followed the publication of two epidemiological studies that have shown that domperidone may be associated with an increased risk of serious ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The risk may be higher in people aged over 60 years and in people who receive a daily oral dose of over 30 mg. However, the benefits of domperidone still outweigh the risks.
The following advice has been issued to health care professionals about domperidone:
Domperidone should be used at the lowest effective dose in adults and children.
Domperidone should not be prescribed to people already taking medication that may prolong the QT interval (such as ketoconazole or erythromycin).
Prescribers should be particularly cautious about prescribing to people who have an existing prolongation of cardiac conduction intervals (particularly QTc), significant electrolyte disturbances, or an underlying cardiac disease (such as congestive heart failure).
Patients should be advised to seek prompt medical attention if symptoms such as syncope or tachyarrhythmias arise during treatment.
Reference: MHRA (2011) Direct Healthcare Professional communication on domperidone and cardiac safety. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. www.mhra.gov.uk [Free Full-text (pdf)]
Changes in product availability
No changes in product availability since 1 August 2008.
Goals and outcome measures
Goals
To relieve the symptoms of an acute attack of migraine
To reduce the frequency, severity, and duration of migraine attacks
To identify possible trigger factors
QIPP — Options for local implementation
QIPP — Options for local implementation
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
Review the appropriateness of NSAID prescribing widely and on a routine basis, especially in people who are at higher risk of both gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality (e.g. older patients).
If initiating an NSAID is obligatory, use ibuprofen (1200 mg per day or less) or naproxen (1000 mg per day or less).
Review patients currently prescribed NSAIDs. If continued use is necessary, consider changing to ibuprofen (1200 mg per day or less) or naproxen (1000 mg per day or less).
Review and, where appropriate, revise prescribing of etoricoxib to ensure it is in line with MHRA advice and the NICE clinical guideline on osteoarthritis [CSM, 2005; NICE, 2008].
Co-prescribe a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) with NSAIDs for people with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or low back pain (for people over 45 years) in accordance with NICE guidance [NICE, 2008; NICE, 2009a; NICE, 2009b].
Take account of drug interactions when co-prescribing NSAIDs with other medicines (see Summaries of Product Characteristics). For example, co-prescribing NSAIDs with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may pose particular risks to renal function; this combination should be especially carefully considered and regularly monitored if continued.
Background information
Definition
What is it?
Migraine is a primary episodic headache disorder. It is characterized by episodic severe headaches (commonly but not always unilateral, and often described as throbbing or pulsating), with associated symptoms such as photophobia (sensitivity to light), phonophobia (sensitivity to sound), and nausea and vomiting [Bandolier, 2002].
The most widely used and comprehensive headache classification system is The international classification of headache disorders, published by the International Headache Society [Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society, 2004]. This system established six main migraine categories (together with a further 17 subcategories):
The most frequently diagnosed are migraine without aura (previously called common migraine) and migraine with aura (previously called classic migraine, which has a further six subcategories).
Others are childhood periodic syndromes that are commonly a precursor to migraine (three subcategories), retinal migraine, complications of migraine (five subcategories), and probable migraine (three subcategories).
Causes
What causes it?
Migraine is a complex condition, and the exact pathophysiological cause is not fully understood. In recent years, research has focussed on neuroanatomical and genetic causes, such as the trigeminovascular system and its relationship with pain pathways [Goadsby, 2005].
Migraine has a significant genetic component, with about half of people with migraine having a first-degree relative with the condition. Furthermore, the more disabling the migraine is, the more likely there is to be a familial connection [Stewart et al, 1997].
Prevalence
How common is it?
The prevalence of migraine differs between the sexes, being about three times more common in women [Smetana, 2000]. The prevalence in:
Women is about 18%, with a mean age of onset of 18 years.
Men is about 6%, with a mean age of onset of 14 years.
Migraine often leads to reduced productivity at work and has major implications for the economy.
About 90% of people with migraine have moderate or severe pain, about three quarters have reduced ability to work during migraine attacks, and one third require bed rest [Lipton et al, 2007].
It has been estimated that nearly 20 working days a year are lost for each person with migraine (8.3 days due to absenteeism and 11.2 days due to reduced output) [Gerth et al, 2001].
In a general practice of 2000 people there are likely to be five newly diagnosed cases of migraine each year, and 40 consultations for existing migraine [MeReC, 1997]. However, in practice many people with migraine will probably not consult.
Prognosis
What is the prognosis?
The long-term prognosis of migraine is favourable for most people; one study found that over a 12-year period, 80% of people experienced remission or improvement in their migraine, whilst 20% will experience deterioration in their symptoms [Lyngberg et al, 2005].
Complications
What are the complications?
The international classification of headache disorders, published by the International Headache Society, identifies five subcategories of 'Complications of migraine' [Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society, 2004].
Chronic migraine is defined as migraine (usually without aura) on 15 days or more per month. Medication overuse is highly likely.
Status migrainosus is a debilitating migraine attack lasting for more than 72 hours.
Persistent aura without infarction refers to aura symptoms lasting for more than 1 week, with no radiographic evidence of infarction.
Migrainous infarction occurs when symptoms of aura last for more than 60 minutes and neuroimaging shows signs of infarction.
Migraine-triggered seizure is a seizure triggered by migraine with aura.
Migraine is associated with increased risk of ischaemic stroke [Etminan et al, 2005]. A meta-analysis of 14 observational studies investigated the risk of stroke in people with migraine:
The relative risk of ischaemic stroke was 2.16 (95% CI 1.89 to 2.48) in people with migraine. There was no increase in the risk of haemorrhagic stroke.
Users of oral contraceptives had an approximately eight-fold increase in the risk of ischaemic stroke compared with women not taking oral contraceptives, although the absolute risk was small.
Migraine is also associated with an increased risk of depression, bipolar affective disorder, anxiety disorder, and panic disorder [Silberstein et al, 2002].
Diagnosis
Diagnosis of migraine
History and examination
What history and examination should I perform?
History
Take a detailed history in order to exclude other non-serious types of headache; confirm the diagnosis of migraine; and establish the severity and pattern of migraine attacks (to guide management — see Assessment).
The history may also reveal the possibility of there being another cause of headache. The following headache features are a cause for concern as they indicate the possibility of a serious cause of head ache.
Subacute and/or progressive headaches that worsen over time (months).
A headache described as 'the worst ever', or any headache of maximum severity at onset ('thunderclap' headache).
A new or different headache.
Headache with an atypical aura (e.g. aura lasting more than 1 hour or with muscular weakness).
Headache of new onset after 50 years of age or under 10 years of age.
History of fever, hypertension, myalgia, weight loss, scalp tenderness (especially in the temporal area), or other features suggesting a systemic disorder.
History of seizures or other neurological signs that suggest a secondary cause.
Examination
Migraine does not present with physical signs between attacks; the purpose of examination is to exclude other causes of headache, in particular a serious cause.
Perform a general examination:
Check vital signs (blood pressure, pulse, and temperature).
Examine extracranial structures such as carotid arteries, sinuses, scalp arteries, and cervical paraspinal muscles for abnormalities.
Check the neck in flexion compared with lateral rotation to detect meningeal irritation.
Perform a focused neurological examination:
Assess the person's awareness and consciousness, presence of confusion, and memory impairment.
Fundoscopy is mandatory. Examine the eyes for pupil symmetry and reactivity, optic fundi, visual fields, and ocular eye movement.
Test cranial nerve function including corneal reflexes, facial sensation, and facial symmetry.
Check the body for abnormalities of nerve function. For instance, assess for symmetric muscle tone and strength, deep tendon reflexes, plantar reflexes, abnormal sensations, and abnormal gait or arm coordination.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007] and an American guideline on the management of headache [ICSI, 2007].
Diagnosis in adults
How is migraine diagnosed in adults?
Formal diagnosis of migraine is made through history alone, according to criteria set by the second edition of The international classification of headache disorders (ICHD). Migraine in adults can usually be classified as migraine without aura and migraine with aura.
Migraine without aura
This is the most common form of migraine. Diagnose migraine without aura when at least five attacks fulfil the following criteria:
Headache attacks lasting 4–72 hours (untreated or unsuccessfully treated).
Headaches have at least two of the following characteristics:
Unilateral location.
Pulsating quality.
Moderate or severe pain intensity.
Aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity (e.g. walking or climbing the stairs).
During the headache at least one of the following is present:
Nausea and/or vomiting.
Photophobia or phonophobia.
The headache is not attributable to another disorder (see Differential diagnosis).
Migraine with aura
About one third of people with migraine report auras. The following are simplified diagnostic criteria based on those of the ICHD:
There are two or more attacks when one or more fully reversible symptoms of aura develops. These may include:
Visual symptoms with positive features (e.g. flickering lights, spots, or lines) and/or negative features (loss of vision in all or part of the field).
Sensory symptoms with positive features (pins and needles) and/or negative symptoms (numbness).
Dysphasic speech disturbance.
Symptoms of the aura do not last more than 60 minutes (typically 20–30 minutes), and resolve before pain begins.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
Recommendations for the diagnosis of migraine are based on criteria set by the second edition of The international classification of headache disorders (ICHD), published by The International Headache Society [Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society, 2004]; Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007]; and an American guideline on the management of headache [ICSI, 2007].
Diagnosis in children
How is migraine diagnosed in children?
Migraine is relatively common in children, with a prevalence of around 10% in children of school age. Although symptoms of migraine in children are similar to adults, there are some differences. These are listed in Table 1.
Migraine in children also sometimes presents as childhood periodic syndromes:
Cyclic vomiting — principally presents with gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea and vomiting).
Abdominal migraine — presents as abdominal pain.
Benign paroxysmal vertigo of childhood — presents with dizziness and unsteadiness.
As well as the differential diagnosis seen in adults, consider other causes such as dental malocclusion, or myopia or hypermetropia (short- and long-sightedness, respectively).
Table 1. Differences between migraine in adults and children.| Migraine in adults | Migraine in children |
|---|---|
| Usually unilateral or asymmetrical | Usually bilateral |
| Moderate-to-severe headache | Mild-to-severe headache (in younger children, pain may be inferred) |
| Throbbing/stabbing pain | Pain may take any form |
| Duration 4–72 hours | Duration usually less than 4 hours |
| Associated symptoms usually include nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia | Associated symptoms not always present, but vomiting is most common |
| Associated with aura in up to 30% of people | Aura less common |
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
Recommendations for the diagnosis of migraine in children is based on expert opinion from review articles [DTB, 2004; Kernick, 2008].
Diagnosis of menstrual migraine
How is menstrual migraine diagnosed?
Menstrual migraine regularly occurs 2 days before the start of menses, or during the first 3 days of bleeding.
True menstrual migraine is uncommon, affecting about 4–12% of women with migraine.
In contrast, about 60% of women with migraine have menstrual-associated migraine (migraine that occurs within the menses as well as at other times of the menstrual cycle).
It is essential to accurately diagnose menstrual migraine as it impacts on preventive management. Use a migraine diary over a minimum of 3 months to investigate the pattern of headaches and related symptoms. Consider menstrual migraine if the diary confirms this pattern in at least two out of three cycles.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
Recommendations for the diagnosis of migraine are based on a systematic review on the 'influence of estrogen on migraine' [Brandes, 2006]; Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007]; and expert opinion in a review article [NHF, 2007].
Differential diagnosis
What else might it be?
Other conditions may present with signs and symptoms similar to migraine. These may be an alternative form of primary headache disorder, or a secondary cause, which may be serious and life-threatening.
Other causes of primary headache
What are the other causes of primary headache?
When an aura is present, migraine diagnosis is usually relatively easy from the history. The causes of headache that are sometimes difficult to distinguish from migraine without aura are:
Episodic tension-type headache (this is more common in people with migraine).
Medication-overuse headache.
It is important to remember that people may have more than one type of headache. A separate history must be taken for each type.
Primary headache disorders with signs and symptoms similar to migraine are listed in Table 1. The management of these conditions is described in the CKS topics on Headache - cluster, Headache - medication overuse, and Headache - tension-type.
Table 1. Common primary headache disorders and their characteristics.| Type of headache | Characteristics of headache | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Episodic tension-type headache | Usually low-intensity headache which resolves within hours, often occurring infrequently.Often described as a 'tightness' around the head, and rarely unilateral.Generally lacks associated symptoms of migraine (although there may be photophobia or exacerbation of headache with movement). | Most common headache that is misdiagnosed as migraine without aura.The headache is rarely disabling and the person will rarely present with this condition alone. |
| Chronic tension-type headache | Chronic tension-type headache is defined as headache that occurs on 15 days or more a month. | Can be very disabling and difficult to treat. |
| Cluster headache | Typically occurs in daily bouts of 6–12 weeks' duration, every 1–2 years.Pain is extremely intense, always unilateral, and usually focussed behind one eye, but may be more diffuse.Often occurs at night causing great distress until it diminishes (usually after 30–60 minutes).There are usually autonomic ipsilateral symptoms of conjunctival injection, lacrimation, rhinorrhoea or nasal blockage, or ptosis. | Cluster headache is the most common form of trigeminal autonomic cephalgias.Typically affects men aged 20 years or older, who are often smokers. |
| Medication-overuse headache | Symptoms occur while withdrawing from medication (analgesia or triptans), and for up to 2 months thereafter.Symptoms reflect those of the underlying primary headache, usually migraine. | Affects about one in 50 people, mainly women. Affects about 40% of people referred for headache management, and is the single most important cause of inadequately treated headache.Caused by the overuse of symptomatic treatment, including analgesics and triptans.The person may be reluctant to volunteer information on their analgesic intake. |
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
Information on the differential diagnosis primary causes of headache is based on criteria set by the second edition of The international classification of headache disorders (ICHD), published by The International Headache Society [Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society, 2004] and Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007].
Causes of secondary headache
What are the causes of secondary headache?
Secondary causes of headache are listed in Table 1. Most require urgent admission for further assessment and management.
Table 1. Secondary causes of headache.| Secondary cause | Characteristics | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Intracranial tumour (very rare) | Gradual onset of headache over weeks or months.In nearly all cases there will be accompanying signs and symptoms (e.g. epilepsy, personality change, focal neurological signs).Raised intracranial pressure may be detectable through fundoscopy. | Only 3–4% of people with an intracranial tumour will present with headache (about three per million of the population).Suspicion should be heightened if the person is immunosuppressed or has existing cancer (metastases). |
| Meningitis | Headache is acute and increasing in intensity, and usually generalized or frontal, or radiating to the neck.There is usually fever, stiff neck, photophobia, rash, and altered consciousness. | More common in children and young adults. Urgent administration of antibiotics and admission is required. |
| Subarachnoid haemorrhage | Presents as a sudden intense headache, sometimes described as the 'worst ever'.There is often accompanying neck stiffness. | 'Thunderclap' headaches have very serious consequences and demand a low threshold of suspicion, especially in older people.If there is no previous history of headaches of this intensity, immediate admission for brain scanning is required. |
| Giant cell arteritis | Headache symptoms variable, but if present are likely to be persistent and more common at night (may be severe).Only restricted to temporal area in minority of cases.Other features are jaw claudication, systemic illness, scalp and temporal tenderness. | Suspect giant cell arteritis in all people over 50 years of age.Referral is usually necessary for confirmation and initiation of treatment (high-dose oral corticosteroids). |
| Primary angle-closure glaucoma | May present with a generalized headache, which may be acute and severe, or mild and episodic.Other features are a unilateral red eye, impaired vision (coloured haloes around lights), and nausea and vomiting. | Risk factors are older age, female gender, familial history, and long-sightedness.Immediate referral is required for confirmation by slit-lamp examination and gonioscopy. |
| Idiopathic intracranial hypertension | Papilloedema usually present (although may be absent in children). | Rare cause of headache, most commonly affects younger, obese women.Urgent referral for confirmation is required to prevent loss of vision. |
| Carbon monoxide poisoning | Usually presents as persistent headache, often with nausea, vomiting, giddiness, muscular weakness, dimness of vision, and double vision. | Confirmed with carboxyhaemoglobin measurement.Domestic gas appliances should be checked for faults. |
| Transient ischaemic attack | Can present with an aura similar to migraine. | Tends to coccur more abruptly than aura due to migraine. |
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
Information of the differential diagnosis of serious cause of headache is based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007].
Management
Management
Scenario: Adults: covers the management of people older than 16 years of age with migraine.
Scenario: Children: covers the management of infants (older than 6 years of age) through to adolescents (up to 16 years of age) with migraine.
Scenario: Pregnant or breastfeeding women: covers the management of pregnant or breastfeeding women with migraine.
Scenario: Adults
Scenario: Migraine in adults
Assessment
How should I assess a person with migraine?
Confirm the diagnosis of migraine with aura and migraine without aura, and exclude differential diagnoses (which include serious causes) through a detailed history and physical examination. The defining features of migraine compared with tension-type headaches are nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. A throbbing and unilateral pain is also suggestive of migraine. For more information, see Diagnosis in adults and Differential diagnosis.
Assess the severity and nature of attacks. Ask about:
The quality of attacks — the intensity and site of pain, whether the pain spreads, and associated symptoms.
The timing and frequency of attacks — when the attacks started and the reason for the consultation now, how often attacks occur and whether there is any temporal pattern, and how long attacks last.
The possible causes of attacks — suspected triggers, predisposing factors, and familial history.
Relieving factors — the person's activity during attacks, use of over-the-counter medication.
Other factors — what is the person's general health like between attacks, what level of anxiety and concern do attacks cause, is there more than one type of headache present?
For women with migraine with aura, assess for use of combined hormonal contraception, as these are contraindicated. For further information on contraceptive use and migraine, see the section on Headache (migrainous or non-migrainous) in the CKS topic on Contraception - assessment.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache [BASH, 2007].
Diagnosing migraine
It is essential to rule out a secondary cause of migraine, as most are serious in nature, and require urgent admission if suspected.
Migraine is most frequently misdiagnosed as tension-type headache, and vice versa [Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society, 2004]. A systematic review investigated the diagnostic value of symptoms in determining migraine [Smetana, 2000].
The review found that nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia were the symptoms most specific for migraine, with likelihood ratios (LRs) of 19.2, 5.2, and 5.8 respectively.
Throbbing (LR 2.9) and unilateral pain (LR 3.7) were also relatively specific to migraine.
Taken together, these symptoms combined are very likely to indicate the presence of migraine, although the absence of any one of these symptoms makes the diagnosis less likely.
It is important to appreciate different types of headache can coexist, and each must be treated separately.
Assessment of quality and frequency of attacks
A full assessment of the history of migraine is essential to inform treatment of the condition. For instance, it is important to know how many times the person has tried over-the-counter analgesia, whether this was successful, if it has become ineffective, and why the person is now consulting. People who have already tried analgesia unsuccessfully several times will start on a higher rung of the treatment ladder.
The Migraine in Primary Care Advisers group has published guidelines which recommend the grading of migraine severity using formalized questionnaires such as MIDAS and HIT-6, in order that a 'staged or stratified-care plan' can be implemented [Dowson et al, 2002], but these are ot specifically recommended by CKS.
This can be done if time permits (the average consultation with a GP takes less than 12 minutes [BMA et al, 2007]), but should not replace clinical diagnosis or the use of a migraine diary (see Information and self-care advice).
Both MIDAS and HIT-6 were developed and sponsored in part by pharmaceutical companies.
Information and self-care advice
What information and self-care advice should I give to person with migraine?
Inform the person about the course of the illness, and reassure them that whilst the underlying disorder cannot be cured, it can be effectively treated, and usually improves over time.
Consider encouraging the person to use a migraine diary to identify triggers. Give a list of potential triggers and ask the person to record them each day, regardless of whether they have a migraine or not, and review the diary at the next visit. Potential triggers and strategies for management are:
Anxiety and emotion — try to avoid stress (although this is difficult). Relaxation techniques, such as yoga, may help.
Specific foods — these triggers are generally overstated (chocolate, cheese, caffeine, and alcohol have been reported as precipitants).
Change in habits — examples include altered sleep patterns (missing sleep, lying in), eating times (especially missing meals), and long-distance travel (jet lag). Advise the person to return to normal habits as soon as possible.
Strenuous exercise — is thought to trigger migraine in those unaccustomed to it. However, regular exercise may help prevent migraine.
In general, complementary and alternative medicines are not recommended for the treatment or prevention of migraine (with the exception of relaxation techniques such as yoga).
Migraine triggers
Migraine triggers
Identifying triggers is not always possible.Often there is no obvious cause, or there are multiple triggers which may have to combine and overcome a 'threshold' to precipitate an attack.
Too much effort in identifying triggers can cause introspection and be counterproductive.
Many people with migraine cope well with stress but have attacks when they relax, leading to so-called 'weekend migraine'.
Dehydration and missed meals are common triggers. Food should only be suspected as a trigger when migraine occurs within 6 hours of intake, and this effect is reasonably reproducible. Once a food has been identified as a trigger, a trial of avoidance can be undertaken to see if the migraine improves.
Give simple, practical advice on avoidance where possible, and be aware of the limitations of avoidance of triggers. For example, enforced lifestyle changes and consequent reduction in quality of life may not be offset by improvement in migraine in some instances.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache [BASH, 2007], and a narrative review on migraine in children [DTB, 2004].
Prognosis
The prognosis of migraine is variable depending on the individual, but it generally improves with increasing age. A prospective observational study (n = 740) followed people 25–64 years of age with migraine over a period of 12 years [Lyngberg et al, 2005]. Of the people who were successfully followed up (n = 549), 42% had experienced remission, 38% had reduced migraines, and 20% had experienced deterioration in their condition.
Migraine diary
The migraine diary is the most effective method for determining factors that trigger migraine. At least five attacks are recommended before the diary is reviewed so that coincidences or combinations of triggers can be identified, but in practice this may not always be possible.
Triggers and lifestyle changes
It has been reported by one guideline that about 20% of people can reduce the frequency of their attacks by identifying and avoiding triggers [Dowson et al, 2002]. However, the evidence from observational studies to support the role of triggers in migraine is limited.
Stress is believed to be a trigger of migraine. Several studies have shown that reduction of stress through behavioural changes can reduce the frequency of migraine attacks by about one third [Campbell et al, 2000].
A systematic review of observational studies identified chocolate, cheese, and alcohol as significant triggers of migraine [Smetana, 2000]. Although changes in habit, such as loss of sleep or missing meals, were not identified as specific triggers by observational studies, there is anecdotal evidence that these may be important in some individuals. It is also possible that cravings for some foods are premonitory symptoms which are then mistaken by the person as causing migraine [Giffin et al, 2003].
Strenuous exercise has been reported to trigger migraine, and once an attack has become established an aversion to movement is a defining symptom of migraine [Smetana, 2000]. However, there are physiological reasons to suppose regular exercise might improve migraine, as it improves cardiovascular health, improves blood-glucose balance, helps breathing, and produces a general sense of well being.
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)
With the exception of relaxation techniques such as yoga, CKS does not recommend CAM for the treatment or prevention of migraine.
Acupuncture has probably been the most extensively studied CAM technique, and has been reported as being as effective as prophylactic drug treatment by one systematic review [Endres et al, 2007]. However, there are methodological limitations to many studies of acupuncture.
For instance, an NHS Health Technology Appraisal large randomized controlled trial found superiority of acupuncture, but the control was a 'no treatment' group rather than a 'sham acupuncture' group [Vickers et al, 2004].
This is problematic as there is nearly always a large placebo response observed in studies of migraine.
An evidence-based review of migraine concluded that 'the stark message is these (CAM) do not work, or there is no evidence that they work' [Bandolier, 2002]. Although other guidelines have been less sceptical, it is stressed that if a person does choose to use CAM, this should not replace conventional treatment [Dowson et al, 2002]. The person should also bear in mind the cost of treatment, as this is rarely available on the NHS and can be very expensive.
Acute treatment
What acute treatment should I prescribe?
First-line treatment consists of analgesia (paracetamol, aspirin, or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) and (especially if nausea is present) anti-emetics (prochlorperazine, domperidone, or metoclopramide).
Second-line treatment with a triptan may be required if first-line treatment is inadequate.
All people receiving treatment with a triptan should be followed up where possible.
First-line treatment
What first-line treatment should I prescribe?
Simple analgesia is recommended for the first three attacks of migraine (including treatment that has been used before consultation), unless the initial attacks are very severe and disabling, in which case it may be appropriate to start second-line treatment immediately.
Advise the person to lie down in a quiet darkened room (if this is possible and it helps), and take oral analgesia as soon as pain (or a sensation of impending pain) develops:
Paracetamol or aspirin, both available in soluble forms, are suitable first-line analgesics, and are available over-the-counter (OTC).
Ibuprofen is a suitable nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and is available OTC. Tolfenamic acid, naproxen, and diclofenac can be prescribed.
If nausea and vomiting are troublesome, consider prescribing the following options:
An oral anti-emetic, such as prochlorperazine, domperidone, or metoclopramide.
An analgesic with anti-emetic combination, taken as an oral solution. Examples are MigraMax® (lysine acetylsalicylate and metoclopramide) and Paramax® (paracetamol and metoclopramide).
For vomiting that is preventing oral intake, diclofenac and/or domperidone suppositories.
Codeine, either alone or in combination products (e.g. co-codamol, Migraleve®, Nurofen Plus®), or other opioids (such as dihydrocodeine, morphine, and pethidine), should be avoided.
For detailed information on prescribing analgesics, NSAIDs, anti-emetics, or combinations of these drugs, see Standard analgesics, NSAIDs, and anti-emetic drugs, in Prescribing information.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007]. CKS recommends a pragmatic, individualized, stepwise approach that advocates the use of treatment with the least expensive drugs with known efficacy being used first, before advancing up the treatment ladder to migraine-specific drugs (i.e. triptans).
Rest in a quiet, darkened room
Rest in a quiet, darkened room is recommended because photophobia and phonophobia are defining symptoms of migraine [Smetana, 2000]. However, although induction of sleep with hypnotics (such as temazepam or zolpidem) has been suggested by BASH, CKS recommends this should be used as a last resort, due to the adverse effects and addictive potential of these drugs.
Analgesics and NSAIDs
There is good evidence from several randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and meta-analyses of RCTs, to support the use of analgesics and NSAIDs for the symptomatic treatment of acute migraine attacks, although these data are mainly applicable only for moderate or mild attacks [Wenzel et al, 2003].
Although aspirin is no longer a popular analgesic for many painful conditions, there is good evidence for its efficacy in migraine, especially in soluble form or combined with other drugs [Lampl et al, 2007].
Paracetamol is not recommended by BASH because of a lack of evidence for its effectiveness. However, CKS identified an RCT that showed paracetamol is more effective than placebo [Lipton et al, 2000], and as it has a good safety profile and is well tolerated, and is available OTC, it is recommended.
There is good evidence from a meta-analysis that ibuprofen is an effective treatment for acute migraine [Suthisisang et al, 2007]. It is available OTC (at lower doses) and is relatively safe and well tolerated. Although there is less evidence for other NSAIDs [Pfaffenrath and Scherzer, 1995], they are likely to be effective through the same mechanism as ibuprofen.
Anti-emetics
Prokinetic anti-emetics are useful in treating migraine associated with nausea and vomiting. As well as their anti-emetic effect, they increase gastric emptying, and consequently increase the absorption of oral analgesics.
There is evidence from several RCTs that suggests that anti-emetics are an effective adjunct when combined with standard analgesics in the treatment of acute attacks. In practice they are also combined with triptans, when they are believed to exhibit a synergistic effect [DTB, 1998].
Codeine and other opioids
Codeine (and other opioids such as dihydrocodeine, morphine, and pethidine) should be avoided during a migraine attack because they:
Have no proven pain-relieving effect in migraine.
Have adverse effects. In particular it has an emetic effect (increased nausea and vomiting), which can exacerbate existing problems, and it reduces gastric motility, which can decrease the uptake of other drugs.
Have an addictive potential and is implicated in medication-overuse headache.
Second-line treatment
What second-line treatment should I prescribe?
Consider prescribing a triptan if first-line treatment has proved ineffective (e.g. on three independent attacks of migraine, taking over-the-counter treatment into account). There is little to guide choice in the triptan-naive person:
Oral sumatriptan (50 mg or 100 mg) is suitable for most people. Zolmitriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, eletriptan, almotriptan, and frovatriptan are alternatives.
If vomiting restricts oral treatment, consider a non-oral formulation (e.g. zolmitriptan nasal spray or subcutaneous sumatriptan).
Oral ergotamine is not recommended.
For detailed information on prescribing triptans, including choice of drug, see Triptans (5-hydoxytryptamine agonists) in Prescribing information.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007].
Stepwise approach to management of migraine
CKS recommends a pragmatic, individualized, stepwise approach that advocates the use of treatment with the least expensive drugs with known efficacy being used first, before advancing up the treatment ladder to migraine-specific drugs (i.e. triptans).
Although BASH recommend that three unsuccessful treatments with first-line treatments should be tried before triptans are prescribed, clinical judgement should always be used. For instance, a person with clearly diagnosed severe migraine with aura should not have triptans withheld from them, and previous use of over-the-counter medication should be taken into consideration.
Oral triptans
The triptans have been extensively studied, and have been found to exhibit some clinical differences, but in the triptan-naive person, it is unlikely these differences (or personal preferences) can be used to guide prescribing. CKS recommends that, for most people, oral sumatriptan at a dose of 50 mg or 100 mg should be tried first.
There is good evidence from randomized controlled trials that sumatriptan is an effective treatment for acute migraine. Broadly speaking, for every one person to benefit from 100 mg sumatriptan, three would need to be treated (NNT 3.08, 95% CI 2.79 to 3.44) to achieve headache reduction after 1–2 hours [Gawel et al, 2001].
There is no evidence that any triptan is safer than another, and sumatriptan is probably in the mid-range of the tolerability spectrum of triptans.
Although the 100 mg dose has been the most extensively studied triptan regimen, it is only marginally more effective than the 50 mg dose, and has more adverse effects, so 50 mg should also be considered [McCrory and Gray, 2003].
Sumatriptan is available generically; the unit cost is lower than other triptans, and expected to fall. The 50 mg dose is also available over-the-counter [RPSGB, 2006].
There is good evidence from several comparative meta-analyses and head-to-head trials on the effectiveness and tolerability of the other triptans compared with sumatriptan and each other [Ferrari et al, 2001; Gawel et al, 2001; Oldman et al, 2002]. Broadly speaking:
Zolmitriptan is similarly effective to sumatriptan, whereas rizatriptan and eletriptan (at higher doses) are more effective (although eletriptan is less well tolerated).
Almotriptan is as effective as 100 mg sumatriptan but better tolerated, whereas naratriptan and frovatriptan are less effective but have fewer adverse effects.
Non-oral triptans
Parenteral triptans should be considered if vomiting is problematic.
Subcutaneous sumatriptan (6 mg) is the most effective triptan regimen, with on average two people requiring treatment for one to benefit (NNT 2, 95% CI 1.8 to 2.2) [Oldman et al, 2002]. However, it is also the most expensive triptan option, and some people may be put off by the injection.
Intranasal sumatriptan (20 mg) is not recommended if there is vomiting, as it is absorbed through the oral route. Intranasal zolmitriptan (5 mg) may be a better option as about 30% of the drug is absorbed through the nasal mucosa [BASH, 2007].
Ergotamine
Ergotamine is not recommended by CKS for the treatment of acute migraine. Compared with triptans (which have generally superseded it), it has a poor bioavailability (it is best administered rectally), has a worse adverse effect profile, and is more likely to be overused or misused [Goadsby et al, 2002].
Follow up for triptans
How should I follow up an adult receiving triptans for migraine?
Ask the person to make a follow-up appointment after the first pack of triptans has been used (typically three to six doses). At review, enquire about the effectiveness of treatment and how well has been tolerated. If treatment:
Has been effective and well tolerated: continue it indefinitely (with appropriate medication reviews). Ask the person to reconsult only if they experience problems in the future (e.g. increasing severity or frequency of migraine).
Has not been adequate, or was poorly tolerated: reconfirm diagnosis, reassess lifestyle advice, check that usage of treatment is correct, and rule out medication-overuse headache.
Consider prescribing a triptan that is more suitable for the person (for further information, see Treatment failure).
Consider combining a triptan with first-line treatment (e.g. simple analgesic or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug [NSAID] and anti-emetic drug).
If the person has tried two or more triptans unsuccessfully, or treatment is successful but attacks are frequent, consider preventive treatment (see Preventative treatment).
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are largely consistent with Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007].
Follow up
CKS recommends all people receiving triptans for the first time should be followed up to assess the effectiveness of treatment and to confirm the diagnosis, where necessary. A headache that does not respond to several courses of triptans is unlikely to be migrainous. If treatment was successful, repeat prescriptions can be issued.
Poor response to treatment
It is essential to confirm the diagnosis if triptans are proving ineffective, as repeated failure is rare in migraine, with fewer than 10–20% of people not responding to three consecutive treatment courses [Ferrari et al, 2002].
Possible reasons for a poor response to triptans in a person with migraine include [ICSI, 2007]:
Triptans used too little or too late in the attack, or, conversely, used too much (medication overuse).
Inadequate medication for the degree of disability caused by migraine. The person may be using an unsuitable triptan or formulation (e.g. using an oral drug where vomiting is a symptom).
Failure to use adjunctive medication (first-line treatment).
Adjunctive treatment
BASH recommends combining first-line treatments (analgesics and anti-emetics) with triptans if treatment with triptans alone is ineffective. Although there is limited evidence that supports the use of analgesics and NSAIDs with anti-emetics, the evidence for combining a triptan with a first-line drug is scant.
One small randomized controlled trial (n = 16) found that sumatriptan (50 mg) combined with metoclopramide (10 mg) gave superior pain relief to sumatriptan alone [Schulman and Dermott, 2003].
CKS did not identify any reported drug interactions between analgesics, NSAIDs, anti-emetics, and triptans.
Preventative treatment
What preventative treatment should I prescribe?
Preventative treatment should be considered if acute drugs are used very frequently or if acute options are contraindicated.
The usual choice of preventative drugs in primary care are beta-blockers or amitriptyline; anticonvulsants are an option that are usually initiated in primary care.
All people receiving preventative treatment require follow up.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and hormonal treatment can be used to prevent menstrual migraine.
Criteria for preventive treatment
When should I consider preventive treatment?
Use a migraine diary and consider preventive treatment if:
Migraine attacks are causing frequent disability (e.g. there are two or more attacks per month that produce disability lasting for 3 days or more).
Migraine attacks are suspected of causing medication overuse (analgesics or triptans). It is essential to rule out medication-overuse headache before preventive treatment is initiated. If this is suspected then the appropriate management is drug withdrawal rather than prevention (see the CKS topic on Headache - medication overuse for further information).
Use of medication on more than 2 days per week on a regular basis carries a clear risk of medication-overuse headache: review the diagnosis.
Use of medication on more than 1 day per week on a regular basis requires enquiry as to how the drugs are being used and a review of diagnosis. Preventive drugs are an option.
Standard analgesia and triptans are either contraindicated or ineffective.
Migraine is of an uncommon type, such as hemiplegic migraine, or migraine with prolonged aura. Consider referral or seek expert advice.
Before prescribing, discuss the benefits (reduction in attacks) and risks (adverse effects) with the person as ultimately they should decide whether to try preventive treatment. Explain that preventive treatment reduces the frequency of attacks, but acute treatment will still be required.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007], and a narrative review [Snow et al, 2002].
There is no evidence from controlled trials to guide when an individual should be offered preventive drugs for migraine. These are pragmatic recommendations made by experts, and reflect the likely thresholds when most people will benefit from treatment to reduce their frequency of headaches.
Preventive treatment for migraine is an individual choice and personal factors should always be taken into account, for example the person's lifestyle (e.g. their job and extent of absenteeism) and their attitude to chronic medication.
Choice of preventive drug
Which preventive drug should I prescribe?
Prescribe a beta-blocker or amitriptyline first-line according to the suitability for the person (i.e. take into account adverse effects and contraindications).
Beta-blockers — propranolol, metoprolol, and timolol are licensed for migraine prevention. Atenolol is a good alternative, but is not licensed. Beta-blockers are:
Suitable for people with coexisting hypertension or anxiety.
Not suitable for people with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, peripheral vascular disease, or heart failure.
Amitriptyline is not licensed for migraine prevention but is commonly used (take care to avoid the suggestion that this is a treatment for depression or stress). Amitriptyline is:
Suitable for people with coexisting depression, tension-type headaches, other pain syndromes, or disturbed sleep.
Not suitable for people who have had a myocardial infarction, or have ischaemic heart disease, arrhythmia, or epilepsy.
Anticonvulsants are second-line drugs for the prevention of migraine. Consider seeking specialist advice or referral before initiating topiramate (licensed) or sodium valproate (not licensed), as both are associated with potentially serious adverse effects (especially beware of the teratogenic potential of valproate). Pizotifen is another option, but generally lacks efficacy and is poorly tolerated.
For further information on dosing regimens, contraindications, and adverse effects of beta-blockers and amitriptyline, see Drugs for the prevention of migraine in Prescribing information.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007].
Beta-blockers
Beta-blockers will probably be a first-line option for most non-asthmatic people with migraine. Theoretically, the ideal beta-blocker for use in migraine should be hydrophilic and cardioselective (properties that are associated with fewer adverse effects) and should have no intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (partial agonists have been found to be ineffective) [Snow et al, 2002]:
Propranolol has the most evidence from randomized controlled trials to support its use in migraine prevention [Linde and Rossnagel, 2004]. However, it is not cardioselective.
Metoprolol has partial cardioselectivity and no sympathomimetic properties. It is taken twice a day.
Timolol has the advantage that it requires only once-daily dosing, which may improve compliance.
Atenolol is a good choice, as it is cardioselective, has no intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, and is hydrophilic. However it is not licensed.
Amitriptyline
The available evidence suggests that amitriptyline has similar efficacy to propranolol [Modi and Lowder, 2006]. It is a tricyclic antidepressant drug which makes it suitable for some groups of people, but not others.
Anticonvulsants
CKS recommends that second-line treatment with anticonvulsants should be initiated under specialist care.
Sodium valproate can cause serious blood abnormalities which require monitoring [BASH, 2007].
The manufacturer of topiramate states 'topiramate should be restricted to specialist care and treatment should be managed under specialist supervision or shared care arrangements' [ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2008c].
Other drugs
A large number of drugs have been suggested for the prevention of migraine. Most have limited evidence regarding their effectiveness or have potentially serious adverse effects, and are only suitable for specialist use:
Pizotifen only has limited evidence for its effectiveness, and it is associated with unwanted adverse effects which limit its use [MeReC, 2002].
Other anticonvulsants include gabapentin, lamotrigine, and levetiracetam, but there is a lack of evidence for their efficacy [Pappagallo, 2003].
Methysergide is associated with retroperitoneal and retropleural fibrosis [Snow et al, 2002].
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are no more effective than placebo [Moja et al, 2005].
Verapamil only has limited evidence of efficacy and has adverse effects [Snow et al, 2002].
Follow up during preventive treatment
How should I follow up a person taking preventive drugs?
Advise the person to return if adverse effects are severe enough to affect compliance during dose titration. Otherwise, review regularly during titration (e.g. every 2–3 weeks) to assess tolerability (first) and effectiveness. If preventive treatment:
Has been effective and well tolerated, continue for 4–6 months, then taper and discontinue over 2–3 weeks, and reassess need.
Has been ineffective or poorly tolerated, taper and discontinue over 2–3 weeks, and consider an alternative if there are no contraindications (amitriptyline if a beta-blocker was tried, or a beta-blocker if amitriptyline was tried).
If a beta-blocker and amitriptyline have both been tried unsuccessfully (or either are contraindicated), and frequent attacks are still problematic, review diagnosis (in particular for medication-overuse headache), and consider referral.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007].
Recommendations for follow up and duration of treatment are pragmatic in nature and not an absolute guide. Ultimately, the person with migraine will dictate timescales during preventive treatment.
Preventive drugs take time to work, and it is essential that the person continues to take them during the first few weeks so their effectiveness can be assessed, provided there are no intolerable adverse effects. This should be fully explained to the person, as the drop-out rates seen in randomized controlled trials are high [Linde and Rossnagel, 2004].
Migraine is cyclical, with periods of acute exacerbation followed by more benign periods, so prolonged administration of a preventive drug is rarely appropriate. Usually, it is appropriate to stop treatment after a period of about 6 months.
Preventive drugs for menstrual migraine
Which preventive drug regimen should I prescribe for menstrual migraine?
Confirm the diagnosis of menstrual migraine using a migraine diary for a minimum of three cycles, and consider the woman's comorbidities (if present) and the need for contraception before prescribing non-hormonal or hormonal migraine prevention. Preventive drugs for menstrual migraine should be tried for at least three cycles whilst effectiveness is established.
Non-hormonal prevention with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or triptan:
Consider prevention with an NSAID if menorrhagia or dysmenorrhea is present. Mefenamic acid is the NSAID of choice (off-licence indication), taken at a dose of 500 mg, 3–4 times a day, from the onset of menses to the last day of bleeding.
Use of preventive triptans may be an option in secondary care.
Hormonal treatment:
Oestrogen supplements are not licensed for menstrual migraine. Consider:
Transdermal estradiol patches 100 micrograms. Start 3 days before the onset of menses and continued for 7 days. If this is effective but poorly tolerated, a 50 microgram patch can be considered.
Estradiol gel 1.5 mg is an alternative, applied 3 days before the start of the period, for 7 days.
Hormonal contraceptives are useful if menstrual migraine is present and contraception is desired. Consider:
The combined oral contraceptive (COC). Consider an oestrogen supplement during the pill-free period, or take the pill continuously for 9 weeks ('tricycling', results in five rather than 13 periods per year).
Alternatively, consider oral desogestrel (Cerazette®, the only progesterone pill to inhibit ovulation), sub-dermally implanted etonogestrel (Implanon®), or injectable depot progestogens.
For women in whom migraine occurs during the pill-free interval in a cycle of COCs:
If it is migraine without aura, consider: changing to a different progestogen; tricycling (see above); or prescribing an oestrogen supplement (patch or gel, see above).
If migraine with aura occurs, the COC must be stopped, and other methods of contraception used.
See the CKS topic on Contraception - combined hormonal methods and Contraception - progestogen-only methods for more information on hormonal methods of contraception. See the CKS topic on Menopause for more information on oestrogen–only HRT.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007].
True menstrual migraine is relatively uncommon, affecting less than 10% of women with migraine, and is thought to occur because of oestrogen withdrawal before menstruation. Treatment of menstrual migraine either directly prevents oestrogen withdrawal (hormonal methods) or preempts the symptoms (non-hormonal methods).
Non-hormonal methods
Mefenamic acid is recommended for most women with migraine who do not wish to use hormonal treatment. It is not licensed for migraine but is licensed for dysmenorrhoea or menorrhagia [ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2007].
A preventive regimen of frovatriptan is recommended by BASH, owing to its long half-life. However, CKS recommends it should not be initiated in primary care because, for many women, taking a more effective triptan as required will be a better option, and:
It is not licensed for the prevention of migraine, and the recommended regimen would be expensive.
A crossover randomized controlled trial (n = 546) found that frovatriptan (2.5 mg taken twice a day) reduced the rate of menstrual migraines compared with placebo (67% occurrence with placebo compared with 41% for frovatriptan) [Silberstein et al, 2004]. However, the clinical relevance of this is unclear, especially considering a four-times daily regimen of frovatriptan (another arm of the trial) was less effective than the two-dose regimen (52% of women having menstrual migraine).
Hormonal methods
There is no evidence from controlled trials to support the use of hormonal methods of contraception, but preventing ovulation or oestrogen withdrawal will by definition reduce the frequency of menstrual migraine. The methods recommended are based on expert opinion from BASH.
Referral criteria
When should I refer a person with migraine?
Consider admission or urgent referral if a serious cause of headache is suspected, or if the person is in severe, uncontrolled status migrainosus (migraine lasting for more than 72 hours).
Consider referral to neurology if:
A complication of migraine has developed (e.g. migraine has become chronic).
Diagnosis of migraine is uncertain (for example another primary or secondary headache disorder is suspected).
Maximal treatment available in primary care does not adequately control the symptoms (suspect medication-overuse headache).
Preventive treatment does not adequately reduce the frequency of headaches.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
CKS identified no UK-based referral criteria. However, these recommendations are consistent with the principals of Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache [BASH, 2007], as well as North American guidelines [ICSI, 2007].
Scenario: Children
Scenario: Migraine in children
Assessment
How should I assess a child with migraine?
Confirm the diagnosis of migraine in the child, and exclude differential diagnoses (which include serious causes) through a detailed history and physical examination.
Migraine may present with atypical symptoms compared with adults. For example, attacks are often shorter, pain is variable in quality and usually bilateral, and associated symptoms of nausea and vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia may be absent.
For younger children, headache may be inferred by the child's behaviour.
Assess the severity and frequency of attacks, and their impact on the child's life. Ask about:
The timing and frequency of attacks — when the attacks started and the reason for the consultation now, how often attacks occur and if there is any temporal pattern, how long attacks last, and time missed from school.
Any emotional problems and triggers — for example bullying or problems at home.
Relieving factors — the child's activity during attacks, use of over-the-counter medication.
Other factors — what is the child's general health like between attacks, what level of anxiety and concern do they cause (for the child and parent), is more than one type of headache present?
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache [BASH, 2007].
Children with migraine often present with atypical symptoms. It is important to recognize this, as the condition is underdiagnosed in primary care [Kernick, 2008].
Information and self-care advice
What information and self-care advice should I give to a child with migraine?
Consider encouraging the child (or carer) to use a migraine diary to identify triggers.
Although their importance is often overstated, specific foods (especially chocolate and cheese) have been reported to precipitate migraine. However, missing meals and dehydration is likely to be more relevant.
Advise the child or carer to follow a regular routine, with set meals and bedtimes.
In general, complementary and alternative medicines are not recommended for the treatment or prevention of migraine in children.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache [BASH, 2007], and a narrative review on migraine in children [DTB, 2004].
Treatment of children
How should I treat a child with migraine?
For the symptomatic relief of acute attacks:
Prescribe simple analgesia for most children with migraine. Paracetamol or ibuprofen are suitable.
If nausea and vomiting are predominant symptoms, consider prescribing an anti-emetic drug. Domperidone is licensed in children of all ages, and prochlorperazine is licensed in children older than 12 years of age. Domperidone can also be used in the absence of nausea and vomiting to promote gastric motility.
If symptoms of migraine are severe, or simple analgesia and/or anti-emetics have proved inadequate, consider prescribing sumatriptan nasal spray (10 mg). This is the only triptan licensed for adolescents (children older than 12 years of age).
Initiation of preventive treatment in primary care is not generally recommended for children with migraine. However, pizotifen or propranolol are licensed options if required.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on narrative reviews of migraine in children, although there is some limited trial evidence for some treatments [DTB, 2004; Kernick, 2008].
For relief of acute migraine, there is evidence from randomized controlled trials that paracetamol, ibuprofen, and sumatriptan nasal spray are effective in children [Damen et al, 2005], and are licensed accordingly [BNF 55, 2008].
Aspirin is not recommended because of the risk of Reye's syndrome, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs other than ibuprofen are not licensed for the treatment of migraine in children.
Triptans other than sumatriptan nasal spray have not been shown to effective in the treatment of migraine in children, partly due to a very high placebo response, which can approach 60% [Kernick, 2008].
CKS does not recommend preventive treatment in primary care unless the healthcare professional has a specialist interest in headaches (consider getting expert advice or referral). The evidence for the effectiveness of pizotifen and propranolol is poor in children with migraine (although both are licensed), and these drugs have adverse effects and contraindications, making them unsuitable for some children.
Follow up
How should I follow up a child with migraine?
Review routinely after 1 month, but ask the child or carer to return sooner if symptoms worsen significantly in the meantime. Treatment options are limited in children, so there needs to be a low threshold for referral (see Referral criteria).
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are largely consistent with Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007].
Referral criteria
When should I refer a child with migraine?
Consider admission or urgent referral if a serious cause of headache is suspected, or if the child is in severe, uncontrolled status migrainosus (migraine lasting for more than 72 hours).
Consider referral to paediatrics if:
A complication of migraine has developed (e.g. migraine has become chronic).
Diagnosis of migraine is uncertain (e.g. another primary or secondary headache disorder is suspected).
Maximal treatment available in primary care does not adequately control the symptoms (suspect medication-overuse headache).
Preventive treatment is indicated but the expertise is not available in primary care, or preventive treatment has been tried but does not adequately reduce the frequency of headaches.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
CKS identified no UK-based referral criteria. However, these recommendations are consistent with the principals of Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache [BASH, 2007], as well as North American guidelines [ICSI, 2007].
Scenario: Pregnant or breastfeeding women
Scenario: Migraine in pregnant or breastfeeding women
Assessment
How should I assess a woman with migraine who is pregnant or breastfeeding?
Confirm the diagnosis of migraine with aura and migraine without aura, and exclude differential diagnoses (which include serious causes) through a detailed history and physical examination.
The defining features of migraine compared with tension-type headaches are nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. A throbbing and unilateral pain is also suggestive of migraine.
Be aware that new-onset migraine is rare in pregnant women. For more information on diagnosis, see Diagnosis in adults and Differential diagnosis.
Assess the severity and nature of attacks. Ask the woman about:
The quality of attacks — the intensity and site of pain, whether the pain spreads, and associated symptoms.
The timing and frequency of attacks — when the attacks started and the reason for the consultation now, how often attacks occur and whether there is any temporal pattern, and how long attacks last.
The possible causes of attacks — suspected triggers, predisposing factors, and familial history.
Relieving factors — the woman's activity during attacks, use of over-the-counter medication.
Other factors — what is the woman's general health like between attacks, what level of anxiety, concern, and fear do attacks cause, is more than one type of headache present?
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache [BASH, 2007].
Migraine in pregnancy
Migraine in pregnancy is quite unusual, with 60–70% of women experiencing improvement, and only 4–8% experiencing worsening. Therefore it is particularly important to rule out other causes (including pre-eclampsia) in pregnant women [Aube, 1999].
Diagnosing migraine
It is essential to rule out a secondary cause of migraine, as most are serious in nature, and require urgent admission if suspected.
Migraine is most frequently misdiagnosed as tension-type headache, and vice versa [Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society, 2004]. A systematic review investigated the diagnostic value of symptoms in determining migraine [Smetana, 2000].
The review found that nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia were the symptoms most specific for migraine, with likelihood ratios (LRs) of 19.2, 5.2, and 5.8 respectively.
Throbbing (LR 2.9) and unilateral pain (LR 3.7) were also relatively specific to migraine.
Taken together, these symptoms combined are very likely to indicate the presence of migraine, although the absence of any one of these symptoms makes the diagnosis less likely.
It is important to appreciate different types of headache can coexist, and each must be treated separately.
Assessment of quality and frequency of attacks
A full assessment of the history of migraine is essential to inform treatment of the condition. For instance, it is important to know how many times the person has tried over-the-counter analgesia, whether this was successful, if it has become ineffective, and why the person is now consulting. People who have already tried analgesia unsuccessfully several times will start on a higher rung of the treatment ladder.
The Migraine in Primary Care Advisers group has published guidelines which recommend the grading of migraine severity using formalized questionnaires such as MIDAS and HIT-6, in order that a 'staged or stratified-care plan' can be implemented [Dowson et al, 2002], but these are ot specifically recommended by CKS.
This can be done if time permits (the average consultation with a GP takes less than 12 minutes [BMA et al, 2007]), but should not replace clinical diagnosis or the use of a migraine diary (see Information and self-care advice).
Both MIDAS and HIT-6 were developed and sponsored in part by pharmaceutical companies.
Information and self-care advice
What information and self-care advice should I give to a woman who is pregnant or breastfeeding?
Lifestyle advice alone is sufficient for most pregnant women with migraine. Consider encouraging the woman to use a migraine diary to identify triggers. Give a list of potential triggers and ask the woman to record them each day, regardless of whether they have a migraine or not, and review after 1 month. Potential triggers and strategies for management are:
Anxiety and emotion — try to avoid stress (although this is difficult). Relaxation techniques, such as yoga, may help.
Specific foods — these triggers are generally overstated (chocolate, cheese, caffeine, and alcohol have been reported as precipitants).
Change in habits — examples include altered sleep patterns (missing sleep, lying in), eating times (especially missing meals), and long-distance travel (jet lag). Advise the person to return to normal habits as soon as possible.
Strenuous exercise — is thought to trigger migraine in those unaccustomed to it. However, regular exercise may help prevent migraine.
Explain that:
Triptans and drugs for the prevention of migraine cannot be used in pregnancy (and should be discontinued if the woman becomes pregnant while taking these drugs).
In general, complementary and alternative medicines are not recommended for the treatment or prevention of migraine in pregnancy (with the exception of relaxation techniques such as yoga).
Migraine triggers
Migraine triggers
Identifying triggers is not always possible.Often there is no obvious cause, or there are multiple triggers which may have to combine and overcome a 'threshold' to precipitate an attack.
Too much effort in identifying triggers can cause introspection and be counterproductive.
Many people with migraine cope well with stress but have attacks when they relax, leading to so-called 'weekend migraine'.
Dehydration and missed meals are common triggers. Food should only be suspected as a trigger when migraine occurs within 6 hours of intake, and this effect is reasonably reproducible. Once a food has been identified as a trigger, a trial of avoidance can be undertaken to see if the migraine improves.
Give simple, practical advice on avoidance where possible, and be aware of the limitations of avoidance of triggers. For example, enforced lifestyle changes and consequent reduction in quality of life may not be offset by improvement in migraine in some instances.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache [BASH, 2007], and a narrative review on migraine in children [DTB, 2004].
Prognosis
The prognosis of migraine is variable depending on the individual, but it generally improves with increasing age. A prospective observational study (n = 740) followed people 25–64 years of age with migraine over a period of 12 years [Lyngberg et al, 2005]. Of the people who were successfully followed up (n = 549), 42% had experienced remission, 38% had reduced migraines, and 20% had experienced deterioration in their condition.
Migraine diary
The migraine diary is the most effective method for determining factors that trigger migraine. At least five attacks are recommended before the diary is reviewed so that coincidences or combinations of triggers can be identified, but in practice this may not always be possible.
Triggers and lifestyle changes
It has been reported by one guideline that about 20% of people can reduce the frequency of their attacks by identifying and avoiding triggers [Dowson et al, 2002]. However, the evidence from observational studies to support the role of triggers in migraine is limited.
Stress is believed to be a trigger of migraine. Several studies have shown that reduction of stress through behavioural changes can reduce the frequency of migraine attacks by about one third [Campbell et al, 2000].
A systematic review of observational studies identified chocolate, cheese, and alcohol as significant triggers of migraine [Smetana, 2000]. Although changes in habit, such as loss of sleep or missing meals, were not identified as specific triggers by observational studies, there is anecdotal evidence that these may be important in some individuals. It is also possible that cravings for some foods are premonitory symptoms which are then mistaken by the person as causing migraine [Giffin et al, 2003].
Strenuous exercise has been reported to trigger migraine, and once an attack has become established an aversion to movement is a defining symptom of migraine [Smetana, 2000]. However, there are physiological reasons to suppose regular exercise might improve migraine, as it improves cardiovascular health, improves blood-glucose balance, helps breathing, and produces a general sense of well being.
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)
With the exception of relaxation techniques such as yoga, CKS does not recommend CAM for the treatment or prevention of migraine.
Acupuncture has probably been the most extensively studied CAM technique, and has been reported as being as effective as prophylactic drug treatment by one systematic review [Endres et al, 2007]. However, there are methodological limitations to many studies of acupuncture.
For instance, an NHS Health Technology Appraisal large randomized controlled trial found superiority of acupuncture, but the control was a 'no treatment' group rather than a 'sham acupuncture' group [Vickers et al, 2004].
This is problematic as there is nearly always a large placebo response observed in studies of migraine.
An evidence-based review of migraine concluded that 'the stark message is these (CAM) do not work, or there is no evidence that they work' [Bandolier, 2002]. Although other guidelines have been less sceptical, it is stressed that if a person does choose to use CAM, this should not replace conventional treatment [Dowson et al, 2002]. The person should also bear in mind the cost of treatment, as this is rarely available on the NHS and can be very expensive.
Treatment in pregnancy or breastfeeding
How should I treat a pregnant or breastfeeding woman?
In general, drug treatment should be limited in pregnancy. If treatment is essential, prescribe the lowest effective dose for the shortest time. For pain relief, prescribe simple analgesia.
Paracetamol is the drug of choice for most women.
Ibuprofen should be avoided in the third trimester.
Aspirin should be avoided early in pregnancy, in women attempting to conceive, and in the third trimester.
Triptans are contraindicated.
If nausea and vomiting are problematic, consider prescribing an anti-emetic (although none are licensed in pregnancy). For further information, see the CKS topic on Nausea/vomiting in pregnancy.
Promethazine and cyclizine are recommended first line.
Metoclopramide can be used if these are not effective, and is also useful in the absence of nausea to promote gastric motility (avoid in women younger than 20 years of age). Consider domperidone if adverse effects are a problem with metoclopramide, although data on use in pregnancy are limited.
Treat breastfeeding women with the same drugs as those used in pregnancy except that:
Aspirin should be avoided completely.
Triptans can be used during breastfeeding, but milk should be expressed and discarded for 12–24 hours after the dose (see manufacturer's information).
Drugs for the prevention of migraine are not recommended in pregnant or breastfeeding women. If attacks are frequent or severe, consider referral.
For further information on the use of drugs in pregnancy, contact the UK Teratology Information Service (UKTIS), formerly the National Teratology Information Service (NTIS), on 0844 892 0909. For further information on the use of drugs when breastfeeding, contact the UK Drugs in Lactation Advisory Service (0116 255 5779 or 0121 311 1974). Information is also available on their website: www.ukmicentral.nhs.uk.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007], and a textbook on the safety of drugs during pregnancy and lactation [Schaefer et al, 2007].
Simple analgesics
Ibuprofen (and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) or aspirin should be avoided after 30 weeks of pregnancy, because of the risk of premature closure of the ductus arteriosus. Aspirin should not be used in early pregnancy or in women who are trying to conceive (due to implantation complications), or when breastfeeding (due to the potential risk of Reye's syndrome).
Triptans
Triptans should be avoided in pregnancy because of a lack of safety data. For example, post-marketing data from over 1000 women in the first trimester of pregnancy receiving sumatriptan indicated no increase in the risk of congenital defects. However, the manufacturer concluded this was insufficient to guarantee the drug's safety, and commented that data in the second and third trimesters were lacking [ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2008a].
Triptans are secreted in breast milk, so they should be avoided whilst breastfeeding unless the milk is expressed and discarded, although the excretion of oral sumatriptan into breast milk is thought to be minimal.
Anti-emetics
Cyclizine and promethazine are recommended first-line in pregnancy as they have been most extensively studied and are considered to be relatively safe [UKMI, 2007]. However, they are not prokinetic, so may not be as effective as other anti-emetic drugs.
BASH recommend the use of metoclopramide or domperidone as prokinetic anti-emetics. CKS recommends that metoclopramide should be preferred of the two, because there is more evidence for its safety [Schaefer et al, 2007]. However, it should be avoided in woman under 20 years of age because of the risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects.
Follow up
How should I follow up a pregnant or breastfeeding woman with migraine?
Review routinely after 1 month, but ask the woman to return sooner if symptoms worsen significantly in the meantime. Treatment options are limited in pregnancy, so there needs to be a low threshold for referral (see Referral criteria).
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are largely consistent with Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007].
Referral criteria
When should I refer a pregnant or breastfeeding woman?
Consider admission or urgent referral if a serious cause of headache is suspected, or if the woman is in severe, uncontrolled status migrainosus (migraine lasting for more than 72 hours).
Consider referral to neurology if:
A complication of migraine has developed (e.g. migraine has become chronic).
Diagnosis of migraine is uncertain (e.g. another primary or secondary headache disorder is suspected).
Maximal treatment available in primary care does not adequately control the symptoms (suspect medication-overuse headache).
Preventive treatment is indicated.
Basis for recommendation
Basis for recommendation
CKS identified no UK-based referral criteria. However, these recommendations are consistent with the principals of Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache [BASH, 2007], as well as North American guidelines [ICSI, 2007].
Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC) (http://medicines.org.uk/emc), or the British National Formulary (BNF) (www.bnf.org).
Standard analgesics, NSAIDs, and anti-emetic drugs
First-line: standard analgesics, NSAIDs, and anti-emetic drugs
Available first-line drugs
Which analgesics, NSAIDs, anti-emetics, and combination products are available?
The analgesic drugs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and anti-emetic drugs suitable for the first-line treatment of migraine in the UK are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Analgesics, NSAIDs, and anti-emetics for acute migraine.| Drug class | Drug name | Available strengths and formulations | Proprietary names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analgesics | Paracetamol*Aspirin* | Tablets, soluble tablets 500 mgOral suspension 120 mg/5mL, 250 mg/5mlTablets, dispersible tablets 300 mg | Non-proprietary, Calpol®, Disprol®, Medinol®, Paldesic®, Panadol® available for suspensionsNon-proprietary, Caprin®, Nu-seals® |
| NSAIDs | Ibuprofen*NaproxenDiclofenacTolfenamic acidMefenamic acid† | Tablets 400 mg, 600 mg, oral suspension 100 mg/5mLTablets 250 mg, 275 mgTablets 50 mg, suppositories 100 mgTablets 200 mgTablets 500 mg | Non-proprietary, Brufen®Non-proprietary, Naprosyn®, Synflex®Non-proprietary, Voltarol® RapidClotam®Non-proprietary |
| Anti-emetics | ProchlorperazineDomperidoneMetoclopramide | Buccal tablets 3 mgTablets 10 mg, suppositories 30 mgTablets 10 mg, oral soulution 5 mg/5mL | Buccastem®Non-proprietary, Motilium®Non-proprietary, Maxolon® |
| Combination drugs | Lysine acetylsalicylate and metoclopramideParacetamol and metoclopramide | Oral powder 900 mg, 10 mgTablets, effervescent powder 500 mg/5 mg | MigraMax®Paramax® |
Choice of analgesics and NSAIDs
Prescribe a standard oral analgesic or ibuprofen for most people presenting with symptoms of migraine (these are also available over-the-counter), and advise the person to take the maximum licensed and tolerated dose as soon as symptoms become apparent (i.e. aura or premonitory symptoms).
Oral solutions are particularly suitable, especially if the person experiences difficulty swallowing or has experienced vomiting. Adult doses are:
Aspirin 600 mg to 900 mg every 4 hours, no more than four doses in 24 hours (not suitable for children).
Ibuprofen 400 mg to 600 mg every 4 hours, no more than four doses in 24 hours.
Paracetamol 1000 mg every 4 hours, no more than four doses in 24 hours. This is a less preferred option to be considered if other drugs are contraindicated.
Consider prescribing an alternative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) if standard analgesia has been tried unsuccessfully (adults only):
Naproxen 750 mg to 825 mg as a single dose, followed by a further 250 mg to 275 mg up to twice in 24 hours (if necessary).
Diclofenac (potassium salt) 50 mg to 100 mg as a single dose, maximum 200 mg in 24 hours (if necessary).
Tolfenamic acid (rapid-release) 200 mg as a single dose, repeated once (if necessary).
If vomiting is preventing absorption, consider diclofenac suppositories 100 mg; two can be used in 24 hours.
Clarification / Additional information
For combination products containing analgesics and anti-emetics, see Choice of anti-emetic drug.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007].
The drugs recommended are licensed for the treatment of acute migraine [BNF 55, 2008].
CKS recommends that oral paracetamol, aspirin, or ibuprofen are tried first in people with acute migraine.
There is most evidence from randomized controlled trials to support the effectiveness of simple analgesics and ibuprofen in the treatment of migraine, especially migraine with mild-to-moderate pain. These drugs are readily accessible and available over-the-counter.
Naproxen, diclofenac, and tolfenamic acid are prescription-only medicines. In general there is less evidence and experience to support their use.
Diclofenac suppositories are the only licensed non-oral NSAID formulation suitable for the treatment of migraine in primary care.
Choice of anti-emetic drug
Prescribe anti-emetics if nausea or vomiting are prominent symptoms (domperidone and metoclopramide are also effective for pain relief when combined with analgesics). Consider:
Domperidone 10 mg to 20 mg, up to four doses in 24 hours (as tablets or suspension).
Metoclopramide 10 mg, up to three doses in 24 hours (as tablets or suspension, not recommended in children).
Prochlorperazine buccal tablets 3 mg to 6 mg, up to two doses in 24 hours.
Consider a combined analgesic and anti-emetic if this is more convenient than taking the components separately (although this is a more expensive option):
MigraMax® — lysine acetylsalicylate (equivalent to aspirin 900 mg) and metoclopramide (10 mg) sachet. A further dose can be taken after 2 hours if necessary, up to three doses in 24 hours.
Paramax® — paracetamol (500 mg) and metoclopramide (5 mg), tablets or sachets. Two doses should be taken at the onset of the attack, maximum six doses in 24 hours.
If vomiting is preventing oral absorption, consider domperidone suppositories 30 mg to 60 mg, maximum 120 mg in 24 hours.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are consistent with Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007].
The drugs recommended are licensed for the treatment of acute migraine [BNF 55, 2008].
Prokinetic anti-emetics are useful in treating migraine associated with nausea and vomiting. As well as their anti-emetic effect, they increase gastric emptying, and consequently increase the absorption of oral analgesics. Prochlorperazine is not a prokinetic drug, but is a phenothiazine with anti-emetic effects.
There is evidence from several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that suggests that anti-emetics are an effective adjunct when combined with standard analgesics in the treatment of acute attacks.
From the available evidence, prochlorperazine and metoclopramide may reduce pain, whereas domperidone may shorten the duration of attacks, although it is difficult to interpret the effects of these drugs from RCTs.
Contraindications to first-line treatment
Simple analgesics are generally considered to be safe when used for short periods of time at the appropriate dose.
Paracetamol should be avoided in people with liver disease, and some experts suggest that it should also be avoided in people who drink excessive quantities of alcohol.
Aspirin is not suitable in children younger than 16 years of age because of Reye's syndrome. It should be avoided in people with a history of peptic ulceration and used with caution in people with asthma or allergic diseases (because of bronchospasm).
The main contraindications to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are known hypersensitivity, asthma, renal impairment, severe hepatic impairment, and a history of gastrointestinal bleeding or peptic ulceration.
For more information on cautions and contraindications, see the CKS topic on NSAIDs - prescribing issues.
There are limitations on using NSAIDs for migraine in pregnant and breastfeeding women; see Treatment in pregnancy or breastfeeding.
Anti-emetics are suitable for most adults:
Prochlorperazine is not recommended in children younger than 12 years of age.
Metoclopramide should be avoided in young people (20 years of age or younger), because extrapyramidal adverse effects are more common in this age group.
Domperidone should be avoided in:
Pregnant and breastfeeding women.
People taking medications that prolong the QT interval such as erythromycin and ketoconazole.
Be particularly cautious when prescribing domperidone to people aged over 60 years and people who have:
Existing prolongation of cardiac conduction intervals (particularly the QTc interval).
Electrolyte disturbance.
An underlying cardiac disease (such as congestive heart failure).
Basis for recommendation
Cautions and contraindications are based on information in the British National Formulary [BNF 55, 2008] and information regarding the cardiac risks of domperidone from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in collaboration with McNeil Products Ltd., and Winthrop Pharmaceuticals [McNeil Products Ltd and Winthrop Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd, 2011]. The Summary of Product Characteristics for individual drugs can be obtained from the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC) (www.medicines.org.uk).
Adverse effects of first-line treatment
Paracetamol and aspirin rarely have adverse effects when used for the short-term treatment of migraine:
Paracetamol has no notable adverse effects when used at the correct dosage.
Aspirin may cause gastrointestinal irritation, skin rashes, and bronchospasm. Use an alternative if these occur.
The risk of severe adverse effects (gastrointestinal or cardiovascular) from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are lower in people younger than 65 years of age who are taking NSAIDs for short periods, which will include most people with migraine. In general, children tolerate ibuprofen better than adults do.
Ibuprofen may occasionally cause minor gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as discomfort, nausea, and diarrhoea. Other adverse effects, such as gastrointestinal bleeding, are less common but potentially serious.
Adverse effects associated with naproxen, diclofenac, tolfenamic acid, and mefenamic acid are likely to be more common and severe than with ibuprofen. For more information on managing the adverse effects of NSAIDs, see the CKS topic on NSAIDs - prescribing issues.
Anti-emetics are usually well tolerated in adults.
Prochlorperazine may cause sedation and extrapyramidal adverse effects (especially dystonia), but these are likely to be mild with occasional low-dose use.
Metoclopramide can induce acute dystonic reactions. However, these reactions are more common in younger people (particularly girls and young women) and people who are taking other drugs known to cause extrapyramidal effects. Other adverse effects include drowsiness, restlessness, and diarrhoea.
Domperidone is generally very well tolerated with few undesirable effects.
Extrapyramidal adverse effects are very rare as domperidone does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier.
Domperidone may be associated with an increased risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death: these risks may be higher in people aged over 60 years, and people who are taking more than 30 mg of domperidone daily.
Advise a person taking domperidone to seek prompt medical attention if symptoms such as syncope or tachyarrhythmias arise during treatment.
Basis for recommendation
Information on adverse effects are based on information in the British National Formulary [BNF 55, 2008] and information regarding the cardiac risks of domperidone from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in collaboration with McNeil Products Ltd., and Winthrop Pharmaceuticals [McNeil Products Ltd and Winthrop Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd, 2011]. The Summary of Product Characteristics for individual drugs can be obtained from the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC) (www.medicines.org.uk).
Triptans (5-hydoxytryptamine agonists)
Second-line: triptans (5-hydoxytryptamine agonists)
Available products
What triptan products are available?
The triptans available in the UK are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Triptan products available in the UK.| Triptan | Available formulations and strengths | Proprietary name |
|---|---|---|
| Sumatriptan | Oral tablets 50 mg*, 100 mgSubcutaneous injection 6 mgNasal spray 10 mg, 20 mg† | Imigran RADIS®, Imigran Recovery®, and available as non-proprietaryImigran®Imigran® |
| Almotriptan | Oral tablets 12.5 mg | Almogran® |
| Eletriptan | Oral tablets 20 mg, 40 mg | Relpax® |
| Frovatriptan | Oral tablets 2.5 mg | Migard® |
| Naratriptan | Oral tablets 2.5 mg | Naramig® |
| Rizatriptan | Oral tablets 5 mg, 10 mgOrodispersible wafer 10 mg | Maxalt®Maxalt® Melt Wafers |
| Zolmitriptan | Oral tablets 2.5 mgOrodispersible tablets 2.5 mg, 5 mgNasal spray 5 mg | Zomig®Zomig Rapimelt®Zomig® |
Choice of triptan
Oral sumatriptan (50 mg or 100 mg) is recommended as the first-line triptan for most people. Zolmitriptan (2.5 mg), naratriptan (2.5 mg), rizatriptan (10 mg), eletriptan (40 mg), almotriptan (12.5 mg), and frovatriptan (2.5 mg) are more expensive alternatives, but it is difficult to predict any advantages of these drugs on the first occasion a triptan is used.
If vomiting restricts oral treatment, consider a non-oral formulation, such as zolmitriptan nasal spray (5 mg) or subcutaneous sumatriptan (6 mg).
Clarification / Additional information
For a full list of available triptan products, see Available products.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are consistent with Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007].
There is good evidence from several comparative meta-analyses and head-to-head trials on the effectiveness and tolerability of the triptans, which has led to the conclusion that there are clinical differences between the drugs, which may be important in some individuals [Ferrari et al, 2001; Gawel et al, 2001; Oldman et al, 2002]. However, CKS recommends sumatriptan to be used first in most people requiring a triptan because:
There is more evidence from randomized controlled trials to support the use of sumatriptan than any other triptan. Although the 100 mg dose has been most extensively studied and used as a comparator drug, it is reasonable to consider 50 mg as well, as the higher dose is only marginally more effective, and has more adverse effects [McCrory and Gray, 2003]. Although there is no evidence that any triptan is safer than another, sumatriptan is in the mid-range of tolerability compared with other triptans.
The clinical advantages seen with the other triptans will not be apparent until a response with sumatriptan has been observed first. For more information, see Treatment failure.
It is reasonable to prescribe a non-oral triptan on the first occasion if vomiting is known to be a problem with oral administration.
Subcutaneous sumatriptan (6 mg) is the most effective triptan regimen [Oldman et al, 2002], but is also the most expensive, and some people may be put off by the injection.
Intranasal sumatriptan (20 mg) is not recommended if there is vomiting, as it is absorbed through the oral route. Intranasal zolmitriptan (5 mg) may be a better option as about 30% of the drug is absorbed through the nasal mucosa [BASH, 2007].
Treatment failure
If treatment with the initial choice of triptan (usually sumatriptan) proves to be inadequate, assess compliance, and consider:
Increasing to a dose of sumatriptan 100 mg (if not used already), or switching to a parenteral formulation (especially if vomiting is problematic). Subcutaneous sumatriptan 6 mg is the most effective triptan available.
Prescribing a more effective triptan, such as rizatriptan 10 mg, almotriptan 12.5 mg, eletriptan 40 mg, or eletriptan 80 mg (two 40 mg tablets).
If initial treatment was effective but poorly tolerated, check the correct dosage was used, and consider prescribing a better tolerated triptan:
Almotriptan is better tolerated and as effective as sumatriptan 100 mg.
Naratriptan and frovatriptan (both 2.5 mg) are better tolerated than sumatriptan 100 mg, but not as effective.
Lower doses of other triptans, such as rizatriptan (5 mg) and eletriptan (20 mg), are less likely to cause adverse effects, although this is an off-licence use of these drugs.
Clarification / Additional information
For information on what a person should do if they are experiencing relapses, see Advice to patients.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007].
The triptans exhibit clinical differences which are important for some individuals for whom initial treatment has not been satisfactory (see Summary comparison).
There is evidence from a systematic review that rizatriptan, almotriptan, and eletriptan are more effective than sumatriptan 100 mg [Ferrari et al, 2002]. Sumatriptan 100 mg is marginally more effective than sumatriptan 50 mg [McCrory and Gray, 2003], whereas subcutaneous sumatriptan (6 mg) is the most effective available triptan [Oldman et al, 2002].
For new triptan users, tolerability is likely to be a bigger issue than lack of effectiveness [Cutrer et al, 2004]. There is evidence from a systematic review that almotriptan and naratriptan are better tolerated than sumatriptan 100 mg (but naratriptan is less effective) [Ferrari et al, 2002]. Frovatriptan is also probably better tolerated than sumatriptan, but it is considerably less effective [Poolsup et al, 2005].
Contraindications
Triptans should not be taken by:
People with uncontrolled hypertension.
People with, or at high risk of, cardiovascular disease. This is determined by the medical history and age of the person. If there is uncertainty, consider an exercise electrocardiogram, or referral to a cardiologist.
People with coronary vasospasm (including Prinzmetal's angina).
There are age restrictions on the use of triptans:
Children younger than 12 years of age should avoid taking triptans. Adolescents (12–18 years of age) may be prescribed sumatriptan nasal spray (10 mg).
Triptans are not licensed for people aged over 65 years, although if they have been previously used and found to be effective, there is no reason to stop prescribing them.
Triptans are contraindicated in pregnancy. Triptans are excreted in breast milk, so they should be avoided during breastfeeding, or milk should be discarded for 12–24 hours (see manufacturer's information).
A reduced dose of triptan is recommended for some triptans if there is hepatic or renal dysfunction:
Sumatriptan — do not exceed 50 mg in people with hepatic dysfunction.
Rizatriptan — prescribe 5 mg in people with hepatic dysfunction and moderate renal dysfunction, and in people receiving concomitant propranolol (avoid in severe renal dysfunction).
Eletriptan — prescribe 20 mg in people with renal dysfunction and avoid in severe hepatic dysfunction.
Rizatriptan — prescribe 5 mg in people with mild or moderate hepatic or renal dysfunction, or who are taking propranolol (leave at least 2 hours between doses of drugs).
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007], and the British National Formulary [BNF 55, 2008].
Triptans are not recommended in children or older people (over 65 years) because of a lack of evidence on their effectiveness and safety. However, CKS recommends that if an older person has previously found a triptan to be effective, the drug should be continued providing no cardiovascular comorbidity has developed in the meantime.
Post-marketing data from over 1000 women in the first trimester of pregnancy receiving sumatriptan indicated no increase in the risk of congenital defects. However, the manufacturer concluded this was insufficient to guarantee the drug's safety, and commented that data in the second and third trimesters were lacking [ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2008a].
Adverse effects
The cardiovascular risk of triptans is probably very low in people without contraindications; although there have been isolated reports of myocardial infarction, these are usually related to unstable coronary heart syndromes such as Prinzmetal's angina, rather than atheroma.
Although adverse effects frequently occur with triptans, they are usually mild and self limiting, and many have also been recorded in people receiving inactive placebos. Common adverse effects (sometimes known as 'triptan sensations') include a warm-hot sensation, tightness, tingling, flushing, and feelings of heaviness or pressure in areas such as the face and limbs, and occasionally the chest:
Symptoms in the chest may mimic angina pectoris and cause considerable alarm. If the person is forewarned about these feelings, they rarely cause problems.
However, consider discontinuing the triptan if the person complains of intense chest pains or sensations, as this could be due to coronary vasoconstriction.
Other adverse effects are generally mild and self limiting for all triptans. They include nausea, dizziness, somnolence, dry mouth, and drowsiness. If drowsiness occurs, the person should be advised not to drive or perform other skilled tasks while affected.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007] and the British National Formulary [BNF 55, 2008].
Triptans are regarded as relatively safe in the absence of contraindications. Evidence from a large number of randomized trials [Ferrari et al, 2002], and the large numbers of people exposed to sumatriptan, indicates that serious adverse effects are rare.
Although minor adverse effects are common and may affect drug compliance, this can be minimized by forewarning the person about the potential for altered sensations [Goadsby et al, 2002]. The large placebo response commonly observed in migraine trials suggest many of these symptoms occur as a result of the attack, rather than the treatment.
Interactions
Triptans are contraindicated in people who are:
Taking monoamine oxidase inhibitors, or within 2 weeks of stopping a monoamine oxidase inhibitor.
Taking ergotamine or derivatives of ergotamine, including methysergide (both of which may be used by specialists as preventative treatments for cluster headache).
In addition, people taking eletriptan should not use CYP3A4 inhibitors (such as clarithromycin, erythromycin, ketoconazole, itraconazole, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir). Other triptans are not metabolized by this route so are not expected to interact.
Triptans should be used with caution in people taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), selective noradrenalin reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), lithium, sibutramine, or St John's wort (because of the small but significant risk of serotonin syndrome).
If the person needs an antidepressant, consider using mirtazapine, trazodone, mianserin, or reboxetine in preference to an SSRI, SNRI or St John's wort.
Rizatriptan plasma levels are increased by propranolol. A maximum dose of rizatriptan 5 mg should be used. Alternatively, use another triptan.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on information from Stockley's drug interactions [Baxter, 2008] and the NICE guideline Depression in adults with a chronic physical health problem[NICE, 2009c].
Advice to patients
Inform the person that mild symptoms (or 'triptan sensations') are common and not a cause for concern. However, if there are intense chest pains or sensations, the person should stop treatment and seek medical advice.
Advise the person to take the triptan as soon as pain develops (but not during aura, if present). After the first dose has been taken:
If the triptan successfully relieves pain, but there is relapse, a dose of triptan can be repeated within 2–4 hours.
Sumatriptan — three doses (total of 300 mg) of sumatriptan can be taken in 24 hours.
Almotriptan, eletriptan, naratriptan, and rizatriptan — two doses can be taken in 24 hours.
Zolmitriptan — four doses (total of 10 mg) can be taken in 24 hours.
If the triptan is ineffective, a further dose is unlikely to be effective and should not be taken. The exception to this is zolmitriptan (2.5 mg), where an additional 5 mg dose can be tried after 2 hours even if the first dose was unsuccessful.
Advise the person that it is important they are reassessed for more effective treatment if current triptan use continues to be inadequate.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache, published by the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) [BASH, 2007], and the British National Formulary [BNF 55, 2008].
Chest pains:
Intense chest pains or sensations could be due to coronary vasoconstriction, so the person should be advised to discontinue treatment. For more details, see Adverse effects.
Timing of administration:
There is evidence that triptans should be taken immediately once pain has started, rather than delayed until pain is more severe. An open-label, randomized controlled trial (n = 112) found significant benefit with early rather than late treatment with sumatriptan 100 mg [Scholpp et al, 2004].
Relapse:
Relapse is a significant limitation of triptans, affecting 20–50% of triptan-treated migraine attacks. The recommendations are based on the product licences for the individual triptans.
If the person did not respond to an initial dose of triptan, they are unlikely to benefit from repeat administration.
Some experts recommend waiting for 2 pain-free days before a triptan is tried again.
However, data from the manufacturers of Zomig® (zolmitriptan) suggest that a repeat dose of 5 mg may be beneficial, and this is reflected in the product licence [ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2008b].
Drugs for the prevention of migraine
Drugs for the prevention of migraine
Beta-blockers
Dosing regimen:
Propranolol — prescribe 80 mg modified-release propranolol (Inderal® LA) initially. This can be increased to a maximum dose of 240 mg per day if necessary.
Metoprolol — prescribe 50 mg to 100 mg twice a day.
Timolol — prescribe 10 mg to 20 mg once a day.
Atenolol (unlicensed indication) — prescribe 25 mg to 100 mg once a day.
Contraindications and cautions:
Beta-blockers should be avoided in people with:
Asthma, or with chronic obstructive airways disease that has an asthmatic component, as they can precipitate bronchospasm that is unresponsive to beta2-agonists.
Second-degree or third-degree heart block.
Beta-blockers should be used with caution in people with:
Unstable heart failure, as they can worsen the heart failure; this should be stabilized before initiation of a beta-blocker.
Peripheral vascular disease.
Diabetes, as they can slightly raise blood glucose levels and the response to hypoglycaemia may be delayed or symptoms of hypoglycaemia may not occur in the usual way. Avoid beta-blockers in people who experience frequent hypoglycaemia.
Adverse effects:
Adverse effects of beta-blockers include:
Cold extremities, paraesthesiae, and numbness.
Sleep disturbance or nightmares.
Fatigue, depression, and hypoglycaemia.
Sexual dysfunction.
For more information on the contraindications and adverse effects of beta-blockers, as well as information on drug interactions and monitoring, see the section on Beta-blockers in the CKS topic on Hypertension - not diabetic.
Amitriptyline
Before prescribing amitriptyline, explain to the person that the drug is being prescribed to reduce attacks of migraine, and not for depression.
Amitriptyline should be prescribed at a dose of 10 mg initially, and titrated upwards to a maximum dose of 150 mg, if required. Advise the person to take it 1–2 hours before bedtime (it has a sedative effect).
Amitriptyline should be avoided in people who have had a recent myocardial infarction or who have arrhythmia. It should be used with caution in people with ischaemic heart disease or epilepsy.
Common adverse effects include constipation, weight gain, dry mouth, sedation, nausea, and dizziness. These are usually apparent in the first couple of weeks of taking the drug and settle with continued use.
Evidence
Evidence
Supporting evidence
Outcomes in migraine trials
Outcomes commonly used in migraine trials
Drugs used in the acute treatment of migraine have been extensively investigated using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses. The most commonly used outcome measures (endpoints) used are listed in Table 1.
Outcomes used in the study of drugs to prevent migraine are usually restricted to the frequency of migraine attacks over the treatment period.
Table 1. Outcome measures used in RCTs and meta-analyses.| Outcome | Definition | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Response rate (at 2–4 hours) | The proportion of people whose moderate or severe headache at baseline improves to mild or no pain at 2–4 hours post-dose. | Most RCTs investigating triptans have traditionally used the response rate at 2 hours as the primary outcome. |
| Pain-free rate (at 2–4 hours) | The proportion of people whose moderate or severe headache at baseline improves to no pain at 2–4 hours post-dose. | This is the preferred primary outcome in modern RCTs investigating the effectiveness of triptans. It is intuitive, robust, and is less sensitive to the placebo effect than response rate. |
| Recurrence rate (also known as relapse rate) | The proportion of people with headache response at 2 hours post-dose who experience a return (or relapse) of moderate or severe headache in the subsequent 22 hours. | Additional analgesia is not permitted during the 24-hour period. This outcome can be misleading because more effective drugs are often used for more severe headaches, which may be more prone to relapse. |
| Sustained pain-free rate | The proportion of people who were pain free by 2 hours post-dose and who did not experience a recurrence of moderate or severe headache in the subsequent 22 hours. | Additional analgesia is not permitted during the 24-hour period. This is a composite measure, preferred in some meta-analyses. It is preferred as it is easily understood as 'a dose of drug that is fully effective for at least 24 hours'. |
| Consistency | Variable definition. An example is the proportion of people with relief in at least two or three out of three of four actively treated attacks. | Consistency measures how effective a drug is over the course of several migraine attacks. Variations in definition and methodology mean it should be treated with caution. |
| Adverse effects (AE) | Various, including any adverse event, chest adverse events, and central nervous system adverse events. | Adverse effects can be minor (affecting how a drug is tolerated) or severe (affecting how safe a drug is to use). |
Placebo response for acute migraine
Evidence on the placebo response in people with acute migraine
There is a strong placebo effect observed during placebo-controlled trials of migraine, accounting for about half the effect of triptans. A significant number (20%) of people receiving placebo for prevention of migraine reported a decrease in the frequency of attacks. Placebos for migraine treatment have consistently been linked to a perceived increase in adverse effects.
A systematic review (search date: September 2004) identified 98 placebo-controlled trials (n = 30,981) suitable for inclusion for an analysis of the size of the placebo effect in acute migraine [Macedo et al, 2006]. There were 10,678 people in the placebo groups.
The results were (for definitions of outcomes see Table 1):
The response rate after 2 hours was 28.6% (95% CI 26.4 to 30.8), and the pain-free rate was 8.8% (95% CI 7.0 to 10.4). About one quarter of people (24%) experienced improvement in their nausea (95% CI 19 to 30).
Recurrence was similar in both placebo and active intervention groups (14.7% compared with 26.3%), whereas adverse events were more common with the active intervention (although still high for placebo; 23.4% for placebo vs. 32.7% for active intervention).
People rated the intervention as 'good' or 'very good' less often with placebo (24%, 95% CI 1 to 31) than with the active intervention (51%, 95% CI 39 to 64).
Placebo response was greatest with subcutaneous administration than with oral administration.
Overall, these studies show that there is a strong placebo response associated with treatments for migraine; in the case of triptans this is about 30%, with the active drug contributing a further 30% effectiveness. However, it is difficult to establish whether this reflects an anticipated reaction to the placebo, or the natural resolution of the migraine attack.
A systematic review identified 22 RCTs that investigated preventive interventions for migraine [Macedo et al, 2008]. Meta-analysis of the placebo groups revealed that 21% of people had a significantly reduced frequency of attacks, despite not receiving an active drug. Over 30% of people receiving placebo also reported adverse effects.
Analgesics and NSAIDs
Evidence on the effectiveness of analgesics and NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs)
There is evidence from several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that simple analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective in the treatment of acute migraine. Paracetamol and ibuprofen have been shown to be effective in people with mild or moderate migraine, but data are lacking in more severe migraine. There is limited evidence that aspirin is as effective as sumatriptan, even in severe migraine. Other NSAIDs are also probably effective, although there is less high-quality evidence to support their use.
Quality of evidence:
A systematic review (search date: April 2002) investigated the effectiveness of several over-the-counter treatments for migraine [Wenzel et al, 2003].
Whilst there have been several RCTs of sufficient quality to show the effectiveness of these products, people with severe migraine (defined as 50% of attacks being disabling, or 20% of attacks causing vomiting) have been systematically excluded from many studies (with some exceptions, such as aspirin).
Therefore results from these trials cannot be generalized to the whole population of people with migraine, in particular those with more severe forms of attack.
For information on the outcomes commonly used in migraine trials, see Table 1.
Aspirin:
A meta-analysis of individual patient data generated from three RCTs (n = 991) examined the effectiveness and tolerability of effervescent aspirin (1000 mg) compared with sumatriptan (50 mg) and placebo [Lampl et al, 2007]. People were not excluded if they had severe migraine.
After 2 hours, symptoms were evaluated.
Response rate was significantly better in the aspirin and sumatriptan groups than the placebo group, with rates of 51.5% (95% CI 46.6 to 56.5) for aspirin, 46.6% (95% CI 40.0 to 53.2) for sumatriptan, and 33.9% (95% CI 29.1 to 38.6) for placebo.
Pain-free rate was significantly better in the aspirin and sumatriptan groups than the placebo group, with rates of 27.1% (95% CI 22.6 to 31.4) for aspirin, 29.0% (95% CI 23.0 to 34.9) for sumatriptan, and 15.1% (95% CI 11.5 to 18.7) for placebo.
Sustained pain-free rate (at 24 hours) was significantly better in the aspirin and sumatriptan groups than the placebo group, with rates of 23.5% (95% CI 19.3 to 27.7) for aspirin, 22.2% (95% CI 16.7 to 27.6) for sumatriptan, and 14.6% (95% CI 11.0 to 18.1) for placebo.
The authors concluded that effervescent aspirin is as effective as sumatriptan, and in view of its superior adverse effect profile, it should be considered for first-line use, even in people with severe migraine.
Ibuprofen:
A systematic review (search date: November 2006) identified five RCTs suitable for inclusion to assess the efficacy and tolerability of low-dose ibuprofen [Suthisisang et al, 2007].
One study (n = 437) used ibuprofen 200 mg as the intervention, and found it to be superior to placebo. On average, eight people would have to be treated with ibuprofen for one person to experience pain relief (NNT 8, 95% CI 8 to 50).
Four studies (n = 2161) used ibuprofen 400 mg as an intervention.
Response rate was superior in the ibuprofen group, with four people requiring treatment with ibuprofen for one person to benefit (NNT 4, 95% CI 3 to 7).
Pain-free rate was superior in the ibuprofen group, with nine people requiring treatment with ibuprofen for one person to benefit (NNT 9, 95% CI 5 to 20).
Ibuprofen was not superior to placebo in terms of sustained pain-free rate or nausea, but did significantly improve photophobia and phonophobia.
The authors concluded that low-dose ibuprofen is effective for the treatment of pain, photophobia, and phonophobia associated with migraine.
NSAIDs other than ibuprofen:
A narrative review identified 25 RCTs which investigated some aspect of the effectiveness of an NSAID (including ibuprofen and aspirin) in the treatment of migraine [Pfaffenrath and Scherzer, 1995].
The studies were of variable quality and size, but most showed that NSAIDs were more effective than placebo or the comparator drug, although the effect differences were sometimes marginal and of doubtful clinical relevance.
Naproxen, diclofenac, mefenamic acid, and ketoprofen had the most evidence to support their use.
Paracetamol and paracetamol combinations:
An RCT (n = 351) randomized people with migraine to receive 1000 mg paracetamol or placebo within 1 hour of the onset of a migraine headache [Lipton et al, 2000]. After 2 hours they were asked to document their symptoms.
The response rate was significantly better in the paracetamol group (57.8%) compared with the placebo group (38.7%, p = 0.002).
The pain-free rate was significantly better in the paracetamol group (22.4%) compared with the placebo group (11.3%, p = 0.01).
There were also significant improvements in functional disability (p = 0.002) and photophobia (p = 0.02).
The authors concluded that paracetamol was an effective and well tolerated treatment for the pain, disability, and photophobia caused by migraine.
A meta-analysis combined the results of three RCTs (n = 1357) of people with migraine who were randomized to receive a combination of paracetamol (500 mg), aspirin (500 mg), and caffeine (125 mg) or matching placebo during a migraine attack [Lipton et al, 1998]. Symptoms were documented after 2 hours:
Response rate was significantly higher in the active treatment group (59.3%, 95% CI 55 to 63) compared with the placebo group (32.8%, 95% 29 to 37, p < 0.001).
Other outcomes that significantly improved with treatment (p =< 0.01) included reduction in pain, photophobia, and phonophobia, and improved functional ability.
The author concluded that the paracetamol-aspirin-caffeine combination was an effective and well-tolerated drug for the treatment of migraine.
Analgesics combined with anti-emetics:
Several studies have investigated the effectiveness of an analgesic combined with an anti-emetic drug. For more information, see Anti-emetics.
Anti-emetics
Evidence on the effectiveness of anti-emetic drugs
The evidence to support the use of anti-emetics is limited, and interpretation of the available studies is complicated by the concomitant use of analgesics in the interventions. The available evidence suggests that metoclopramide and prochlorperazine may be suitable adjuncts with an analgesic for pain relief, domperidone may shorten the duration of attacks, and dexamethasone is largely ineffective and not suitable for primary care.
Quality of evidence:
Overall, the evidence to support the use of anti-emetics in the treatment of migraine is quite poor (for example, compared with evidence for the triptans). Most studies have investigated combinations of anti-emetics with various analgesics, which makes interpretation of the effectiveness of the anti-emetic component alone difficult.
Metoclopramide:
A systematic review (search date: 2007) identified three randomized controlled trials (RCTs, n = 1469) that investigated the effectiveness of metoclopramide combined with aspirin (or aspirin derivative) compared with a triptan [Azzopardi and Brooks, 2008].
Results were not combined in a meta-analysis, but individual studies showed that both aspirin and metoclopramide combinations were more effective than placebo, although the triptan interventions were superior to aspirin with metoclopramide in some outcomes.
The authors concluded that triptans should be first-line treatment in people with mild-to-moderate migraine, and metoclopramide combinations should be used when triptans are contraindicated.
A systematic review (search date: circa 2004) identified 13 RCTs (n = 655) suitable for inclusion that investigated the effectiveness of parenteral metoclopramide used alone or with analgesia [Colman et al, 2004]. Pooled results suggested that metoclopramide was more effective than placebo in reducing migraine pain, and as effective as a standard analgesic alone.
Prochlorperazine:
An RCT (n = 45) found that, during 114 episodes of migraine, prochlorperazine buccal tablets relieved pain more effectively than placebo or oral ergotamine combined with caffeine [Sharma et al, 2002]. Oral ergotamine has a very poor bioavailability and is usually administered rectally.
An RCT (n = 112) compared treatment with prochlorperazine, indometacin, and caffeine suppositories (a combination drug commonly used in Italy) with sumatriptan suppositories (25 mg) [Di Monda et al, 2003]. The combined product was found to be superior to sumatriptan in terms of pain-free response and nausea. Neither of these products is available in the UK.
An RCT (n = 297) compared treatment with two doses of a combination drug (prochlorperazine, indometacin, and caffeine in a tablet or effervescent formulation) with encapsulated sumatriptan (50 mg) [Sandrini et al, 2007]. The initial dose of both interventions were found to be equally effective, but the combination was significantly superior when used as 'rescue' medication. These products are not available in the UK.
Domperidone:
An RCT randomized 46 people with migraine to receive domperidone 30 mg combined with paracetamol 1000 mg, or 20 mg domperidone combined with 1000 mg paracetamol, or matched placebo combined with 1000 mg paracetamol [MacGregor et al, 1993]. The addition of domperidone was observed to reduce the duration of the migraine attack, but not significantly to reduce pain.
Dexamethasone:
A systematic review and meta-analysis identified seven suitable studies that investigated the effectiveness of parenteral dexamethasone in the treatment of severe migraine in an emergency department setting [Colman et al, 2008]. Dexamethasone was no more effective than placebo in reducing pain, but was associated with significantly less recurrence.
Triptans
Evidence on triptans (5-hydroxytryptamine agonists)
Oral sumatriptan
Evidence on the effectiveness of oral sumatriptan
Oral sumatriptan has been the most extensively investigated triptan, and there is good evidence from numerous well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that it is highly effective in reducing the pain associated with migraine. From the available evidence, there is likely to be a dose-response with oral sumatriptan, with 100Â mg (the usual reference dose) being marginally superior to 50Â mg, and significantly superior to 25Â mg. Subcutaneous sumatriptan (6Â mg) is more effective than oral sumatriptan, whereas intranasal sumatriptan (20Â mg) is as effective as 100Â mg oral sumatriptan.
Probably the most comprehensive and methodologically accomplished systematic review of the triptans was first published in 2001 [Ferrari et al, 2001], and republished with more methodological detail in 2002 [Ferrari et al, 2002].
The authors performed a full literature search (search date: November 2001), and contacted the coordinators of the trials for individual patient data, and used these wherever possible. They also contacted the relevant pharmaceutical companies for unpublished data.
In total, 53 trials were identified (n = 24,809), with sumatriptan being the most studied drug and selected as the comparator in this systematic review (100 mg dose). At a dose of 100 mg, sumatriptan was effective in terms of response rate (59%, 95% CI 57 to 60), pain-free rate (29%, 95% CI 27 to 30), recurrence (30%, 95% CI 27 to 33), and sustained pain-free rate (20%, 95% CI 18 to 21). See Table 1 for information on outcomes used in migraine trials.
Two other systematic reviews of triptans have conclusively shown sumatriptan to be effective in the treatment of migraine.
A meta-analysis of 20 RCTs (n = 2928) found sumatriptan (100 mg) reduced headache in 59% of people [Tfelt-Hansen et al, 2000]. The lower dose of 50 mg was found to be similarly effective in head-to-head trials, although 25 mg was less effective.
A meta-analysis of 12 RCTs (n = 2914) found 100 mg sumatriptan resulted in a response in 57% of people (95% CI 55 to 60) [Gawel et al, 2001]. This means that approximately three people need to be treated with sumatriptan for one person to benefit (NNT 3.08, 95% CI 2.79 to 3.44).
A Cochrane Review (search date: November 2001) specifically investigated the effectiveness of oral sumatriptan in the treatment of migraine [McCrory and Gray, 2003]. Altogether, 25 RCTs were identified (n = 16,200); in terms of pain-free response there was evidence of a dose-response relationship with 100 mg sumatriptan (NNT 5.1, 95% CI 3.9 to 7.1) and 25 mg sumatriptan (NNT 7.5, 95% CI 2.7 to 14.2).
A systematic review (search date: July 2000) identified 48 RCTs that studied interventions for migraine, including subcutaneous and intranasal sumatriptan [Oldman et al, 2002]. Subcutaneous sumatriptan (6 mg) was found to be most effective in terms of headache response, with two people requiring treatment for one person to experience pain relief (NNT 2.0, 95% CI 1.8 to 2.2). Intranasal sumatriptan (20 mg) was less effective (NNT 3.4, 95% CI 2.9 to 4.1), but of similar effectiveness to 100 mg oral sumatriptan (NNT 3.3, 95% CI 3.0 to 3.7).
Effectiveness of triptans
Evidence on the effectiveness of triptans compared with each other
Triptans have been extensively studied using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and there is good evidence of their relative effectiveness and tolerability calculated through a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials as well as data from direct head-to-head trials. There is some evidence that, compared with sumatriptan: zolmitriptan is equivalent; rizatriptan and eletriptan may be more effective (although eletriptan may be less well-tolerated); almotriptan may produce a more sustained and better tolerated effect; and naratriptan and frovatriptan may be better tolerated but less effective. In principle, these properties can be used to guide repeat treatments.
Quality of evidence:
Triptans have been extensively studied using RCTs, and there is now unequivocal evidence to support their effectiveness in the treatment of acute migraine.
Because of the relatively recent development of the triptans, trials have tended to be of high-quality with common outcomes, and these have been identified and described by several systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and summarized in a 'review of reviews' [Tfelt-Hansen, 2006].
When interpreting the effectiveness of triptans, the high placebo response should be taken into account.
Sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, eletriptan, and almotriptan:
Probably the most comprehensive and methodologically accomplished systematic review of the triptans was first published in 2001 [Ferrari et al, 2001], and republished with more methodological detail in 2002 [Ferrari et al, 2002].
The authors performed a full literature search (search date: November 2001), and contacted the coordinators of the trials for individual patient data, and used these data wherever possible. They also contacted the relevant pharmaceutical companies for unpublished data. The relative effectiveness of the triptans with each other was investigated by indirect comparison of placebo-controlled trials (pooled in meta-analyses) and direct comparison of head-to-head trials. For information on the outcomes used in migraine trials, see Table 1.
Results from indirect trials: sumatriptan 100 mg was used as the comparator drug. In broad terms, about three people need to be treated with sumatriptan for one person to experience pain relief (NNT 3, for further information see Oral sumatriptan). Compared with sumatriptan 100 mg:
Effectiveness: rizatriptan 10 mg and eletriptan 80 mg both showed better efficacy (although eletriptan was less well tolerated).
Consistency: rizatriptan 10 mg and almotriptan 12.5 mg both showed better consistency (almotriptan also showed better sustained pain-free response).
Tolerability: naratriptan 2.5 mg, sumatriptan 25 mg, and eletriptan 20 mg all showed less efficacy but were better tolerated.
Zolmitriptan (2.5 mg and 5 mg), eletriptan 40 mg, and rizatriptan 5 mg all showed very similar properties to sumatriptan 100 mg.
Results from head-to-head trials: 22 RCTs were identified that directly compared triptans (or ergotamine) with each other. Results generally concurred with the comparative meta-analyses:
Comparison with sumatriptan 100 mg: there was some evidence that eletriptan and rizatriptan were superior (but eletriptan was less well tolerated); naratriptan was less effective but better tolerated; and almotriptan was equally effective but better tolerated.
Comparison with sumatriptan 50 mg: there was some evidence that rizatriptan 10 mg and eletriptan 40 mg were more effective but caused more adverse effects, and zolmitriptan (2.5 mg and 5 mg) was similarly effective and tolerated.
Other comparisons: in general, sumatriptan 25 mg was less effective than various doses of eletriptan, zolmitriptan, and rizatriptan; zolmitriptan 2.5 mg was as effective as naratriptan 2.5 mg but caused more adverse effects; rizatriptan 10 mg was more effective than zolmitriptan 2.5 mg or naratriptan 2.5 mg.
The authors concluded that, overall, the differences between triptans are relatively small but may be clinically significant to the individual. Therefore the choice of triptan should be made not only according to the differences recorded in these trials (see Table 1 for a summary), but also according individual response and preference.
Three other systematic reviews have been conducted which generally concur [Tfelt-Hansen et al, 2000; Gawel et al, 2001; Oldman et al, 2002]. In addition, systematic reviews specifically on sumatriptan [McCrory and Gray, 2003], naratriptan [Ashcroft and Millson, 2004], eletriptan [McCormack and Keating, 2006], almotriptan [Chen and Ashcroft, 2007], and zolmitriptan [Chen and Ashcroft, 2008] have generally concurred with the results from these reviews [Bandolier, 2002].
Frovatriptan:
Frovatriptan was not included in the previous systematic reviews because of a lack of published data at the time and the manufacturer being unable to supply unpublished trial data [Ferrari et al, 2002]. However, since then a systematic review (search date: February 2005) has been published [Poolsup et al, 2005].
The review identified five RCTs (n = 2866) which investigated the effectiveness and tolerability of frovatriptan (2.5 mg) in the treatment of acute migraine.
The pain-free response (at 2 hours) risk ratio (RR) was 3.70 (95% CI 2.59 to 5.29). However, because of the high placebo response, this means that for every one person to benefit from frovatriptan, 12 people would need to be treated (NNT 12, 95% CI 10 to 15).
The RR of headache response (at 2 hours) was 1.66 (95% CI 1.47 to 1.88), which results in an NNT of 7 (95% CI 6 to 9). Headache recurrence yielded an NNT of 17 (95% CI 9 to 100). Frovatriptan also showed some small but significant benefits in other migraine-associated symptoms such as nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia.
Two trials reported that frovatriptan was associated with more adverse effects than placebo (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.62).
Results from this review indicate that although frovatriptan is more effective than placebo, when absolute values are considered rather than relative values, as is appropriate in migraine trials [Ferrari et al, 2002], the drug is probably less effective than the other available triptans.
Safety and tolerability of triptans
Evidence on the safety and tolerability of triptans
Triptans frequently cause adverse effects which have been documented by randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but they are usually mild and short-lived. If adverse effects are affecting compliance, a triptan which is better tolerated can be tried (e.g. naratriptan or almotriptan). Serious, life-threatening, adverse effects are restricted to case reports and are likely to be rare in otherwise healthy people.
A systematic review of the triptans (search date: November 2001), first published in 2001 [Ferrari et al, 2001], and republished with more methodological detail in 2002 [Ferrari et al, 2002], identified 53 trials (n = 24,809) that investigated the tolerability of the triptans.
Adverse effects with triptans were described as 'frequent but usually mild and short-lived'. These were classified into three categories:
â–ª'Typical' triptan adverse effects, commonly including: tingling; paresthesias; warm sensations in the head, neck, chest, and limbs; and less frequently dizziness, flushing, and neck pain or stiffness.
â–ª'Central nervous system' (CNS) adverse effects (less common), including asthenia, abnormal dreams, agitation, aphasia, ataxia, confusion, dizziness, somnolence, speech disorders, tremors, vertigo, and other focal neurological symptoms.
â–ª'Chest' adverse effects (less common) including chest pressure, chest pain, radiating pain in arm, other chest feelings, heavy arms, shortness of breath, palpitations, and anxiety.
There was a strong placebo effect with regard to adverse effects, with 27% of people complaining of an adverse effect even when they were taking an inactive drug. However, most triptans cause significantly additive adverse effects compared with placebo. For sumatriptan 100Â mg, the mean placebo-subtracted rate of any adverse effect was 13% (95% CI 8 to 18).
â–ªNaratriptan (2.5Â mg) and almotriptan (12.5Â mg) were exceptions in that they did not cause significantly more adverse effects than placebo.
â–ªSumatriptan 100Â mg caused CNS adverse effects in 6% of people (95% CI 3 to 9). There was evidence that eletriptan 80Â mg caused significantly more CNS adverse effects than sumatriptan 100Â mg.
â–ªSumatriptan 100Â mg caused chest adverse effects in 1.9% of people (95% CI 1.0 to 2.7). There appeared to be a dose response with chest adverse effects, with lower doses of sumatriptan (25Â mg), naratriptan (2.5Â mg), rizatriptan (5Â mg), and eletriptan (20Â mg or 40Â mg) not causing significantly more chest problems than placebo (also true of almotriptan 12.5Â mg).
Although there are issues with the tolerability of the triptans, it has been stressed that these issues should not be confused with those of safety [Goadsby et al, 2002]. To date, most safety concerns regarding the triptans have been theoretical or derived from isolated case reports (which do not show causality), and there is no evidence that one triptan is safer than another.
The main theoretical concern of the triptans is their potential to cause coronary vasospasm. Because of this, their use is restricted in people with cardiovascular disease (see Contraindications).
However, given the widespread exposure of people to the triptans (especially sumatriptan, which is now available over-the-counter in the UK [RPSGB, 2006]), and the lack of reports on life-threatening adverse effects from this class of drugs, they are probably a safe option in otherwise healthy people.
Summary comparison of the triptans
A summary of the effectiveness and tolerability of the available triptans relative to 100 mg sumatriptan is listed in Table 1. Frovatriptan was not included because of a lack of available data.
Table 1. Relative effectiveness and tolerability of the triptans.| Triptan and strength | Response rate | Pain free rate | Consistency | Tolerability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sumatriptan 25 mg | ||||
| Sumatriptan 50 mg | ||||
| Zolmitriptan 2.5 mg | ||||
| Zolmitriptan 5 mg | ||||
| Naratriptan 2.5 mg | ||||
| Rizatriptan 5 mg | ||||
| Rizatriptan 10 mg | ||||
| Eletriptan 20 mg | ||||
| Eletriptan 40 mg | ||||
| Eletriptan 80 mg | ||||
| Almotriptan 12.5 mg | ||||
Preventative drugs
Evidence on the effectiveness of drugs to prevent migraine
The evidence for drugs in the prevention of migraine is limited due to the poor quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), especially in terms of reporting, drop-out rates, and small sample sizes. However, there is adequate evidence to recommend beta-blockers (especially propranolol, but also timolol, atenolol, and metoprolol), amitriptyline, and anticonvulsants (sodium valproate or topiramate) for this use.
Beta-blockers:
The best evidence for the effectiveness of beta-blockers in the prevention of migraine is from studies of propranolol. A Cochrane review (search date: May 2003) identified 58 RCTs (n = 5072) suitable for inclusion that investigated the effectiveness of propranolol in migraine prevention [Linde and Rossnagel, 2004].
The methodological quality of the included trials was described as 'unsatisfactory', with poor reporting and high drop-out rates.
Twenty-six RCTs compared propranolol with placebo and, of these, nine trials were suitable to be pooled in a meta-analysis. The relative risk of response was 1.94 (95% CI 1.61 to 2.35).
The remaining trials compared propranolol with another drug, mainly calcium-channel blockers. There were no observed differences between the active interventions, although sample sizes were inadequate to show equivalence.
A narrative review reported on three RCTs that have shown timolol to have similar effect sizes as propranolol. Atenolol, metoprolol, and nadolol have also been shown to be effective, whereas acebutolol and pindolol are probably ineffective [Modi and Lowder, 2006].
Antidepressants:
A narrative review described two studies investigating amitriptyline use in migraine prevention [Modi and Lowder, 2006].
One RCT investigated the effectiveness of amitriptyline (n = 162) in the prevention of migraine compared with placebo. The odds ratio for 50% improvement in migraine index in people receiving amitriptyline was 2.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 5.4).
Another study that compared amitriptyline with propranolol concluded that propranolol was superior in people with a 'single migraine type', whereas amitriptyline showed more benefit in mixed migraine where tension-type headache is implicated.
A Cochrane Review (search date: January 2004) identified 13 RCTs (n = 636) that investigated the effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in preventing migraine [Moja et al, 2005]. It concluded that after 2 months' use, SSRIs were no better than placebo.
Anticonvulsants:
A Cochrane Review (search date: April 2003) identified 15 suitable RCTs that investigated the effectiveness of anticonvulsants in migraine prevention [Chronicle and Mulleners, 2004]. When anticonvulsants were considered as a single class:
Eight trials (n = 841) found that on average anticonvulsants reduced migraines by 1.4 attacks per month, with a standard mean difference (SMD) of –0.60 (95% CI –0.93 to –0.26).
Ten trials (n = 1341) found that anticonvulsants doubled the number of people experiencing a 50% reduction in attacks of migraine (OR 3.90, 95% CI 2.61 to 5.82). This means that for every four people treated with anticonvulsants, one would benefit (NNT 3.8, 95% CI 3.2 to 4.6).
The best evidence for individual anticonvulsants was for sodium valproate and topiramate.
Lifestyle changes
Evidence on the effectiveness of lifestyle changes
There is evidence from observational studies that food, especially chocolate, can trigger migraine attacks. Limited evidence from controlled trials suggests that avoidance of stress may be of benefit in preventing migraine.
A systematic review (search date: May 1999) investigated the role of suspected precipitants in triggering migraine [Smetana, 2000].
Food and alcohol were found to be significant triggers, with a significant positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 3.6 (95% CI 2.8 to 4.6) for all food types (n = 5020).
Cheese was the most frequent precipitant, whereas chocolate was the most specific precipitant (LR 7.1, 95% CI 4.5 to 11.2, n = 3252).
A systematic review (search date not stated) found evidence from 10 controlled trials that relaxation training reduced the frequency of migraine by 32% [Campbell et al, 2000], suggesting that stress avoidance may be of benefit in preventing migraine attacks. However, caution should be used when interpreting this result as the quality of the included trials is unclear.
Anti-migraine drugs in children
Evidence on anti-migraine drugs used in children
The evidence to support the use of drugs to treat migraine in children is generally poor. In the symptomatic treatment of migraine, there is some evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that paracetamol, ibuprofen, and sumatriptan nasal spray are superior to placebo. For the prevention of migraine, the evidence to support the use of pizotifen or propranolol (licensed drugs) is weak or conflicting.
A systematic review (search date: 2004) identified 10 RCTs suitable for inclusion (n = 1575) that investigated the effectiveness of symptomatic drugs in the treatment of migraine in children [Damen et al, 2005]. Six studies were regarded as high-quality, although the drop-out rate was high (20%).
Simple analgesics were more effective than placebo:
Paracetamol marginally reduced headache severity, with a risk reduction (RR) of 1.5 (95% CI 1.0 to 2.1).
Ibuprofen significantly reduced headache severity (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.9).
Of the triptans investigated, only sumatriptan nasal spray was found to be effective.
Sumatriptan nasal spray reduced headache more than placebo (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.7).
Oral sumatriptan and rizatriptan did not have significant benefits over placebo.
The results of this study largely concur with another systematic review [Silver et al, 2008].
Several systematic reviews have investigated the efficacy of drugs for the prevention of migraine in children, and all have concluded that the current evidence base is poor and more research is required:
A Cochrane Review (search date: December 2002) concluded propranolol and flunarizine (unavailable in the UK) were more effective than placebo [Victor and Ryan, 2003]. Nimodipine, timolol, papaverine, pizotifen, trazodone, clonidine, metoclopramide, and domperidone were ineffective.
A systematic review (search date: June 2004) found evidence that flunarizine was more effective than placebo (RR 4.0, 95% CI 1.6 to 10.0) [Damen et al, 2006]. The evidence for propranolol was conflicting, whereas there was a lack of evidence to support the use of nimodipine, clonidine, trazodone, or papaverine.
A systematic review (search date: 2007) concluded that topiramate, valproic acid, amitriptyline have the most data to support their use [Eiland et al, 2007]. Data for the two drugs most commonly used in the UK, pizotifen and propranolol, were conflicting.
Search strategy
Scope of search
A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of migraine with additional searches for evidence in the following areas:
Antiemetics
Search dates
Guidelines 2006 – August 2008
Medline search dates not restricted – August 2008
Key search terms
Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline and these were adapted for other databases. Further details are available on request.
exp migraine disorders/, migraine.tw.
exp antiemetics/, metoclopramide/, metoclopramide.tw, domperidone/, domperidone.tw, prochlorperazine/, prochlorperazine,tw, perphenazine/, perphenazine.tw
Table 1. Key to search terms.| Search commands | Explanation |
|---|---|
| / | indicates a MeSh subject heading with all subheadings selected |
| .tw | indicates a search for a term in the title or abstract |
| exp | indicates that the MeSH subject heading was exploded to include the narrower, more specific terms beneath it in the MeSH tree |
| $ | indicates that the search term was truncated (e.g. wart$ searches for wart and warts) |
Topic specific literature search sources
International Headache Society
City of London Migraine Clinic
Sources of guidelines
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)
National Guidelines Clearinghouse
British Columbia Medical Association
Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement
Guidelines International Network
National Library of Guidelines
National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)
University of Michigan Medical School
Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium
National Resource for Infection Control
NHS Scotland National Patient Pathways
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
UK Ambulance Service Clinical Practice Guidelines
RefHELP NHS Lothian Referral Guidelines
Medline (with guideline filter)
Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Systematic reviews
Protocols
Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
Medline (with systematic review filter)
EMBASE (with systematic review filter)
Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals
NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
NHS Economic Evaluations
Health Technology Assessments
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment
Sources of randomized controlled trials
Central Register of Controlled Trials
Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)
Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries
DynaMed
Central Services Agency COMPASS Therapeutic Notes
Sources of national policy
Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)
References
ABPI Medicines Compendium (2007) Summary of product characteristics for Ponstan Forte tablets 500mg. Electronic Medicines Compendium..Datapharm Communications Ltd.www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]
ABPI Medicines Compendium (2008a) Summary of product characteristics for Imigran tablets 50mg Imigran tablets 100mg. Electronic Medicines Compendium..Datapharm Communications Ltd.www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]
ABPI Medicines Compendium (2008b) Summary of product characteristics for Zomig tablets 2.5mg. Electronic Medicines Compendium..Datapharm Communications Ltd.www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]
ABPI Medicines Compendium (2008c) Summary of product characteristics for Topamax 25 mg, 50mg, 100mg, 200mg tablets and sprinkle capsules 15, 25 or 50 mg. Electronic Medicines Compendium..Datapharm Communications Ltd.www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]
Ashcroft, D.M. and Millson, D. (2004) Naratriptan for the treatment of acute migraine: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 13(2), 73-82. [Abstract]
Aube, M. (1999) Migraine in pregnancy. Neurology 53(4 Suppl 1), S26-S28. [Abstract]
Azzopardi, T.D. and Brooks, N.A. (2008) Oral metoclopramide as an adjunct to analgesics for the outpatient treatment of acute migraine. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 42(3), 397-402. [Abstract]
Bandolier (2002) Migraine special issue. Bandolier...www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier [Free Full-text]
BASH (2007) Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication-overuse headache. ..British Association for the Study of Headache.www.bash.org.uk [Free Full-text]
Baxter, K. (Ed.) (2008) Stockley's drug interactions: a source book of interactions, their mechanisms, clinical importance and management. 8th edn. London: Pharmaceutical Press.
BMA, NHS Employers and DH (2007) 2006/7 UK general practice workload survey. ..British Medical Association.www.ic.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
BNF 55 (2008) British National Formulary. 55th edn. London: British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.
Brandes, J.L. (2006) The influence of estrogen on migraine: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 295(15), 1824-1830. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Campbell, J.K., Penzien, D.B. and Wall, E.M. (2000) Evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache: behavioral and physical treatments. ..American Academy of Neurology.www.aan.com [Free Full-text]
Chen, L.C. and Ashcroft, D.M. (2007) Meta-analysis examining the efficacy and safety of almotriptan in the acute treatment of migraine. Headache 47(8), 1169-1177. [Abstract]
Chen, L.C. and Ashcroft, D.M. (2008) Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of zolmitriptan in the acute treatment of migraine. Headache 48(2), 236-247. [Abstract]
Chronicle, E. and Mulleners, W. (2004) Anticonvulsant drugs for migraine prophylaxis (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library.Issue 3.John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
Colman, I., Brown, M.D., Innes, G.D. et al. (2004) Parenteral metoclopramide for acute migraine: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal 329(7479), 1369-1373. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Colman, I., Friedman, B.W., Brown, M.D. et al. (2008) Parenteral dexamethasone for acute severe migraine headache: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials for preventing recurrence. British Medical Journal 336(7657), 1359-1361. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
CSM (2005) Updated advice on the safety of selective COX-2 inhibitors. ..Committee on Safety of Medicines.www.mhra.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
Cutrer, F.M., Goadsby, P.J., Ferrari, M.D. et al. (2004) Priorities for triptan treatment attributes and the implications for selecting an oral triptan for acute migraine: a study of US primary care physicians (the TRIPSTAR project). Clinical Therapeutics 26(9), 1533-1545. [Abstract]
Damen, L., Bruijn, J.K., Verhagen, A.P. et al. (2005) Symptomatic treatment of migraine in children: a systematic review of medication trials. Pediatrics 116(2), e295-e302. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Damen, L., Bruijn, J., Verhagen, A.P. et al. (2006) Prophylactic treatment of migraine in children. Part 2. A systematic review of pharmacological trials. Cephalalgia 26(5), 497-505. [Abstract]
Di Monda, V., Nicolodi, M., Aloisio, A. et al. (2003) Efficacy of a fixed combination of indomethacin, prochlorperazine, and caffeine versus sumatriptan in acute treatment of multiple migraine attacks: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial. Headache 43(8), 835-844. [Abstract]
Dowson, A.J., Lipscombe, S., Sender, J. et al. (2002) New guidelines for the management of migraine in primary care. Current Medical Research and Opinion 18(7), 414-439. [Abstract]
DTB (1998) Managing migraine. Drug & Therapeutics Bulletin 36(6), 41-44. [Abstract]
DTB (2004) Managing migraine in children. Drug & Therapeutics Bulletin 42(4), 25-28. [Abstract]
Eiland, L.S., Jenkins, L.S. and Durham, S.H. (2007) Pediatric migraine: pharmacologic agents for prophylaxis. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 41(7), 1181-1190. [Abstract]
Endres, H.G., Diener, H.C. and Molsberger, A. (2007) Role of acupuncture in the treatment of migraine. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 7(9), 1121-1134. [Abstract]
Etminan, M., Takkouche, B., Isorna, F.C. and Samii, A. (2005) Risk of ischaemic stroke in people with migraine: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. British Medical Journal 330(7482), 63. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Ferrari, M.D., Roon, K.I., Lipton, R.B. and Goadsby, P.J. (2001) Oral triptans (serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists) in acute migraine treatment: a meta-analysis of 53 trials. Lancet 358(9294), 1668-1675. [Abstract]
Ferrari, M.D., Goadsby, P.J., Roon, K.I. and Lipton, R.B. (2002) Triptans (serotonin, 5-HT1B/1D agonists) in migraine: detailed results and methods of a meta-analysis of 53 trials. Cephalalgia 22(8), 633-658. [Abstract]
Gawel, M.J., Worthington, I. and Maggisano, A. (2001) A systematic review of the use of triptans in acute migraine. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 28(1), 30-41. [Abstract]
Gerth, W.C., Carides, G.W., Dasbach, E.J. et al. (2001) The multinational impact of migraine symptoms on healthcare utilisation and work loss. Pharmacoeconomics 19(2), 197-206. [Abstract]
Giffin, N.J., Ruggiero, L., Lipton, R.B. et al. (2003) Premonitory symptoms in migraine: an electronic diary study. Neurology 60(6), 935-940. [Abstract]
Goadsby, P.J. (2005) Migraine pathophysiology. Headache 45(Suppl 1), S14-S24. [Abstract]
Goadsby, P.J., Lipton, R.B. and Ferrari, M.D. (2002) Migraine - current understanding and treatment. New England Journal of Medicine 346(4), 257-270.
Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society (2004) The international classification of headache disorders. 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 24(Suppl 1), 1-150. [Free Full-text]
ICSI (2007) Health care guideline: diagnosis and treatment of headache. ..Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement.www.icsi.org [Free Full-text]
Kernick, D. (2008) Headache in children. GP Magazine 20 June, 29-30.
Lampl, C., Voelker, M. and Diener, H.C. (2007) Efficacy and safety of 1, 000 mg effervescent aspirin: individual patient data meta-analysis of three trials in migraine headache and migraine accompanying symptoms. Journal of Neurology 254(6), 705-712. [Abstract]
Linde, K. and Rossnagel, K. (2004) Propranolol for migraine prophylaxis (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library.Issue 2.John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
Lipton, R.B., Stewart, W.F., Ryan, R.E., Jr. et al. (1998) Efficacy and safety of acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine in alleviating migraine headache pain: three double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Archives of Neurology 55(2), 210-217. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Lipton, R.B., Baggish, J.S., Stewart, W.F. et al. (2000) Efficacy and safety of acetaminophen in the treatment of migraine: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, population-based study. Archives of Internal Medicine 160(22), 3486-3492. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Lipton, R.B., Bigal, M.E., Diamond, M. et al. (2007) Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy (Cochrane review). Neurology 68(5), 343-349. [Abstract]
Lyngberg, A.C., Rasmussen, B.K., Jorgensen, T. and Jensen, R. (2005) Prognosis of migraine and tension-type headache: a population-based follow-up study. Neurology 65(4), 580-585. [Abstract]
Macedo, A., Farre, M. and Banos, J.E. (2006) A meta-analysis of the placebo response in acute migraine and how this response may be influenced by some of the characteristics of clinical trials. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 62(3), 161-172. [Abstract]
Macedo, A., Banos, J.E. and Farre, M. (2008) Placebo response in the prophylaxis of migraine: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Pain 12(1), 68-75. [Abstract]
MacGregor, E.A., Wilkinson, M. and Bancroft, K. (1993) Domperidone plus paracetamol in the treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia 13(2), 124-127. [Abstract]
McCormack, P.L. and Keating, G.M. (2006) Eletriptan: a review of its use in the acute treatment of migraine. Drugs 66(8), 1129-1149. [Abstract]
McCrory, D.C. and Gray, R.N. (2003) Oral sumatriptan for acute migraine (Cochrane Review) [Withdrawn]. The Cochrane Library.Issue 3.John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
McNeil Products Ltd and Winthrop Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd (2011) Direct healthcare professional communication on domperidone and cardiac safety. ..Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.www.mhra.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
MeReC (1997) Acute treatment of migraine: new products. MeReC Bulletin 8(10), 37-40.
MeReC (2002) The management of migraine. MeReC Bulletin 13(2), 5-8. [Free Full-text]
MHRA (2011) Press release: more exact paracetamol dosing for children to be introduced. ..Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.www.mhra.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
Modi, S. and Lowder, D.M. (2006) Medications for migraine prophylaxis. American Family Physician 73(1), 72-78. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Moja, P.L., Cusi, C., Sterzi, R.R. and Canepari, C. (2005) Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for preventing migraine and tension-type headaches (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library.Issue 3.John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
NHF (2007) Improving patient care in menstrual migraine. ..National Headache Foundation.www.headaches.org [Free Full-text]
NICE (2008) Osteoarthritis. The care and management of osteoarthritis in adults (NICE guideline). .Clinical guideline 59.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
NICE (2009a) Rheumatoid arthritis: the management of rheumatoid arthritis (NICE guideline). .Clinical guideline 79.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
NICE (2009b) Low back pain: early management of persistent non-specific low back pain (NICE guideline). .Clinical guideline 88.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
NICE (2009c) Depression in adults with a chronic physical health problem. Treatment and management. ..National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
NICE (2013) Key therapeutic topics - medicines management options for local implementation. ..National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
NPC (2011) Key therapeutic topics 2010/11 - Medicines management options for local implementation. ..National Prescribing Centre.www.npc.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
Oldman, A.D., Smith, L.A., McQuay, H.J. and Moore, R.A. (2002) Pharmacological treatments for acute migraine: quantitative systematic review. Pain 97(3), 247-257. [Abstract]
Pappagallo, M. (2003) Newer antiepileptic drugs: possible uses in the treatment of neuropathic pain and migraine. Clinical Therapeutics 25(10), 2506-2538. [Abstract]
Pfaffenrath, V. and Scherzer, S. (1995) Analgesics and NSAIDs in the treatment of the acute migraine attack. Cephalalgia 15(Suppl 15), 14-20. [Abstract]
Poolsup, N., Leelasangaluk, V., Jittangtrong, J. et al. (2005) Efficacy and tolerability of frovatriptan in acute migraine treatment: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 30(6), 521-532. [Abstract]
RPSGB (2006) Practice guidance: OTC sumatriptan. ..Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.www.rpsgb.org [Free Full-text]
Sandrini, G., Cerbo, R., Del Bene, E. et al. (2007) Efficacy of dosing and re-dosing of two oral fixed combinations of indomethacin, prochlorperazine and caffeine compared with oral sumatriptan in the acute treatment of multiple migraine attacks: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, parallel group, multicentre study. International Journal of Clinical Practice 61(8), 1256-1269. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Schaefer, C., Peters, P. and Miller, R.K. (Eds.) (2007) Drugs during pregnancy and lactation: treatment options and risk assessment. 2nd edn. Oxford: Academic Press.
Scholpp, J., Schellenberg, R., Moeckesch, B. and Banik, N. (2004) Early treatment of a migraine attack while pain is still mild increases the efficacy of sumatriptan. Cephalalgia 24(11), 925-933. [Abstract]
Schulman, E.A. and Dermott, K.F. (2003) Sumatriptan plus metoclopramide in triptan-nonresponsive migraineurs. Headache 43(7), 729-733. [Abstract]
Sharma, S., Prasad, A., Nehru, R. et al. (2002) Efficacy and tolerability of prochlorperazine buccal tablets in treatment of acute migraine. Headache 42(9), 896-902. [Abstract]
Silberstein, S.D., Lipton, R.B. and Goadsby, P.J. (2002) Headache in clinical practice. 2nd edn. London: Martin Dunitz.
Silberstein, S.D., Elkind, A.H., Schreiber, C. and Keywood, C. (2004) A randomized trial of frovatriptan for the intermittent prevention of menstrual migraine. Neurology 63(2), 261-9. [Abstract]
Silver, S., Gano, D. and Gerretsen, P. (2008) Acute treatment of paediatric migraine: a meta-analysis of efficacy. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 44(1-2), 3-9. [Abstract]
Smetana, G.W. (2000) The diagnostic value of historical features in primary headache syndromes: a comprehensive review. Archives of Internal Medicine 160(18), 2729-2737. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Snow, V., Weiss, K., Wall, E.M. et al. (2002) Pharmacologic management of acute attacks of migraine and prevention of migraine headache. Annals of Internal Medicine 137(10), 840-849. [Free Full-text]
Stewart, W.F., Staffa, J., Lipton, R.B. and Ottman, R. (1997) Familial risk of migraine: a population-based study. Annals of Neurology 41(2), 166-172. [Abstract]
Suthisisang, C., Poolsup, N., Kittikulsuth, W. et al. (2007) Efficacy of low-dose ibuprofen in acute migraine treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 41(11), 1782-1791. [Abstract]
Tfelt-Hansen, P. (2006) A review of evidence-based medicine and meta-analytic reviews in migraine. Cephalalgia 26(11), 1265-1274. [Abstract]
Tfelt-Hansen, P., De Vries, P. and Saxena, P.R. (2000) Triptans in migraine: a comparative review of pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and efficacy. Drugs 60(6), 1259-1287. [Abstract]
UKMI (2007) How should nausea and vomiting be treated during pregnancy? ..UK Medicines Information.www.nelm.nhs.uk
Vickers, A.J., Rees, R.W., Zollman, C.E. et al. (2004) Acupuncture of chronic headache disorders in primary care: randomised controlled trial and economic analysis. Health Technology Assessment 8(48), 1-64. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
Victor, S. and Ryan, S.W. (2003) Drugs for preventing migraine headaches in children (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library.Issue 4.John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
Wenzel, R.G., Sarvis, C.A. and Krause, M.L. (2003) Over-the-counter drugs for acute migraine attacks: literature review and recommendations. Pharmacotherapy 23(4), 494-505. [Abstract]