Clinical Topic A-Z Clinical Speciality

Dementia

Dementia
D003704Dementia
D000544Alzheimer Disease
Mental healthNeurological
2010-03-22Last revised in March 2010

Dementia - Summary

Dementia is a triad of problems: memory loss, decline in some other aspect of cognition, and difficulties with activities of daily living.

More formally, dementia is defined as a syndrome (that is, a distinct pattern of symptoms and signs) that can be caused by many brain disorders, most of which progress gradually over several years. The symptoms of dementia occur in three groups:

Cognitive dysfunction, resulting in problems with memory, language, attention, thinking, orientation, calculation, and problem-solving.

Psychiatric and behavioural problems, such as changes in personality, emotional control, social behaviour, depression, agitation, hallucinations, and delusions.

Difficulties with activities of daily living, such as driving, shopping, eating, and dressing.

Early-onset (or young-onset) dementia, by convention, is dementia that develops before 65 years of age.

The most common causes of dementia include:

Alzheimer's disease (about 50%).

Vascular dementia (about 25%).

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) (about 15%).

Frontotemporal dementia (less than 5%).

Screening for dementia is not recommended for the general population.

Dementia should be suspected:

If when you ask the person a simple question, they immediately turn to their partner — the so-called head-turning sign.

When relatives are concerned about the person's memory or behaviour, but they themselves are not.

Dementia should be suspected when any of the following are reported (by the person or by someone close to them) to be new or deteriorating problems:

Cognitive symptoms: memory problems, misunderstandings, disorientation.

Challenging behaviours, psychiatric symptoms, and personality changes.

Neurological symptoms: gait disturbances, apraxia.

Difficulties with activities of daily life: difficulties with orientation, taking prescribed drugs erratically, neglecting household chores.

Neglecting hygiene or self-care.

Routine investigations should be requested and other conditions excluded, such as normal ageing, mild cognitive impairment, depression, and acute delirium (due to infection, biochemical imbalance, excessive consumption of alcohol, and drugs).

When managing dementia:

Primary care should be coordinated with secondary care and social care.

Information and advice about dementia, its management, and what local support is available should be provided.

People with dementia should have the opportunity to give informed consent to decisions about their care and treatment.

Adults should be assumed to have capacity until proven otherwise despite all available support; assess capacity for each decision; and act in the person's best interests.

Carers' needs (which they may be reluctant to express) should be recognized and supported.

A structured follow up and review process should be in place.

Strategies to cope with disabilities should be promoted so the person can be as independent as possible.

Challenging behaviour should be prevented and managed as far as possible with non-drug psychosocial approaches.

Drug treatment for cognitive symptoms of dementia is initiated by a specialist, but may be continued and monitored by a general practitioner under a shared care protocol.

Have I got the right topic?

360months3060monthsBoth

This CKS topic supports the National Dementia Strategy [DH, 2009a] and the policy on prescribing antipsychotic drugs for people with dementia [Banerjee, 2009; DH, 2009c].

This CKS topic is based on the guideline on dementia published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), and the NICE Technology Appraisals on donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007; NICE, 2009]. It also takes account of guidelines on dementia in people with learning disabilities [British Psychological Society, 2009].

This CKS topic covers the management of dementia in primary care.

This CKS topic does not cover initiation of drug treatments that are used in secondary care. It does not cover the management of conditions closely associated with dementia, such as depression, incontinence, and epilepsy. It does not cover the management of mild cognitive impairment or presumed pre-dementia.

There are separate CKS topics on common comorbidities of dementia including Depression, Epilepsy, and Incontinence - urinary, in women.

The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary health care.

How up-to-date is this topic?

How up-to-date is this topic?

Changes

Last revised in March 2010

February 2013 — minor update. The 2013 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic [NICE, 2013].

January 2013 — minor update. Removed the black triangle status from risperidone as this is no longer a black triangle drug.

October 2012 — minor update. The 2012 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic [NPC, 2012].

March 2012 — minor update. The 2012/2013 QOF indicators have been added to this topic [BMA and NHS Employers, 2012]. Issued in April 2012.

January 2012 — minor update. Prescribing information has been added for memantine, and the Basis of Recommendation has been updated to reflect the most recent considerations of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence regarding memantine. Issued in January 2012.

October 2011 — minor update. A brief summary of the key recommendations from the World Alzheimer Report 2011 which emphasizes the benefits of early diagnosis and intervention, has been included in background information [Alzheimer's Disease International, 2011a; Alzheimer's Disease International, 2011b]. Issued in November 2011.

May 2011 — minor update. The 2011/2012 QOF indicators and the 2010/2011 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic [BMA and NHS Employers, 2011; NPC, 2011]. Issued in June 2011.

April 2011 — minor update. Text added to reflect new recommendations from NICE regarding acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and memantine: Donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease [NICE, 2011a]. Issued in June 2011.

July 2010 — minor update. The NICE Quality Standard relating to Dementia have been added to the Goals and outcome measures section [NICE, 2010]. Issued in August 2010.

November 2009 to March 2010 — this is a new CKS topic. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence.

Update

New evidence

Evidence-based guidelines

Guidelines published since the last revision of this topic:

Hort, J., O’Brien, J.T., Gainotti, G., et al. (2010) EFNS guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Alzheimer’s disease. European Journal of Neurology 17(10), 1236-1248. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Sorbi, S., Hort, J. Erkinjuntti, T., et al. (2012) EFNS-ENS guidelines on the diagnosis and management of disorders associated with dementia. European Journal of Neurology 19(9), 1159-1179. [Abstract]

Villars, H., Oustric, S., Andrieu, S., et al. (2010) The primary care physician and Alzheimer’s disease: an international position paper. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging 14(2), 110-120. [Abstract]

A practice parameter update has been published by the American Academy of Neurology

Iverson, D.J., Gronseth, G.S., Reger, M.A., et al. (2010) Practice parameter update: evaluation and management of driving risk in dementia: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 74(16), 1316-1324. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

A report has been published by Alzheimer's Disease International:

Alzheimer's Disease International (2011) World Alzheimer Report 2011. The benefits of early diagnosis and intervention. Alzheimer's Disease International. www.alz.co.uk [Free Full-text (pdf)]

HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)

No new HTAs since 1 November 2009.

Economic appraisals

No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 November 2009.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Systematic reviews published since the last update of this topic:

Aquirre, E., Woods, R.T., Spector, A., and Orrell, M. (2012) Cognitive stimulation for dementia: a systematic review of the evidence of effectiveness from randomised controlled trials. Ageing Research Reviews 12(1), 253-262. [Abstract]

Azermai, M., Petrovic, M., Elseviers,M.M., et al. (2012) Systematic appraisal of dementia guidelines for the management of behavioural and psychological symptoms. Ageing Research Reviews 11(1), 78-86. [Abstract]

Bond, M., Rogers, G., Peters, J., et al. (2012) The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (review of Technology Appraisal 111): a systematic review and economic model. Health Technology Assessment 16(21), 1-470. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Brodaty, H. and Arasaratnam, C. (2012) Meta-analysis of nonpharmacological interventions for neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia. American Journal of Psychiatry 169(9), 946-953. [Abstract]

Brodaty, H. and Burns, K. (2012) Nonpharmacological management of apathy in dementia: a systematic review. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 20(7), 549-564. [Abstract]

Chen, N., Yang, M., Guo, J., et al. (2013) Cerebrolysin for vascular dementia (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 1. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]

Chien, L.Y., Chu, H., Gui, J.L., et al. (2011) Caregiver support groups in patients with dementia: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 26(10), 1089-1098. [Abstract]

Cheung, G. and Stapelberg, J. (2011) Quetiapine for the treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD): a meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials. New Zealand Medical Journal 124(1336), 39-50. [Abstract]

Connolly, A., Sampson, E.L., and Purandare, N. (2012) End-of-life care for people with dementia from ethnic minority groups: a systematic review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 60(2), 351-360. [Abstract]

Cooper, C., Mukadam, N., Katona, C., et al. (2012) Systematic review of the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life of people with dementia. International Psychogeriatrics 24(6), 856-870. [Abstract]

Cooper, C., Mukadam, N., Katona, C., et al. (2013) Systematic review of the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life and well-being in people with dementia. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 21(2), 173-183. [Abstract]

Di Santo, S.G., Prinelli, F., Adorni, F., et al. (2013) A meta-analysis of the efficacy of donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, and memantine in relation to severity of Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease epub ahead of print. [Abstract]

Dolder, C.R., Davis, L.N., and McKinsey, J. (2010) Use of psychostimulants in patients with dementia. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 44(10), 1624-1632. [Abstract]

Douglas, A., Letts., L., Richardson, J. (2010) A systematic review of accidental injury from fire, wandering and medication self-administration errors for older adults with and without dementia. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 52(1), e1-e10 [Abstract]

Egan, M., Berube, D., Racine, G., et al. (2010) Methods to enhance verbal communication between individuals with Alzheimer's disease and their formal and informal caregivers: a systematic review. International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 2010, 906818. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Etgan, T., Chonchol, M., Forstl, H., and Sander, D. (2012) Chronic kidney disease and cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Nephrology 35(5), 474-482. [Abstract] [Free Full-text (pdf)]

Farina, N., Isaac, M.G.E.K.N., Clark, A.R., et al. (2012) Vitamin E for Alzheimer’s dementia and mild cognitive impairment (Cochrane review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 11. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]

Farrimond, L.E., Roberts, E., and McShane, R. (2012) Memantine and cholinesterase inhibitor combination therapy for Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2(3), e000917. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Fung, J.K., Tsang, H.W., and Chung, R.C. (2012) A systematic review of the use of aromatherapy in treatment of behavioral problems in dementia. Geriatrics and Gerontology International 12(3), 372-382. [Abstract]

Gao, Y., Huang, C., Zhao, K., et al. (2012) Depression as a risk factor for dementia and mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry epub ahead of print. [Abstract]

Hägglund, D. (2010) A systematic literature review of incontinence care for persons with dementia: the research evidence. Journal of Clinical Nursing 19(3-4), 303-312. [Abstract]

Hopper, T., Bougeois, M., Pimentel, J., et al. (2012) An evidence-based systematic review on cognitive interventions for individuals with dementia. American Journal of Speech and Language Pathology epub ahead of print. [Abstract]

Hulme, C., Wright, J., Crocker, T., et al. (2010) Non-pharmacological approaches for dementia that informal carers might try or access: a systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 25(7), 756-763. [Abstract]

Husebo, B.S., Ballard, C. and Aarsland, D. (2011) Pain treatment of agitation in patients with dementia: a systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 26(10), 1012-1018. [Abstract]

Hyde, C., Peters, J., Bond, M., et al. (2013) Evolution of the evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and economic model. Age and Aging 42(1), 14-20. [Abstract]

Irvine, K., Laws, K.R., Gale, T.M. and Kondel, T.K. (2012) Greater cognitive deterioration in women than men with Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 34(9), 989-998. [Abstract]

Iverson, D.J., Gronseth, G.S., Reger, M.A., et al. (2010) Practice Parameter update: Evaluation and management of driving risk in dementia. Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 74(15), 1316-1324. [Abstract][Free Full-text]

Jaturapatporn, D., Isaac, M.G.E.K.N., McCleery, J., and Tabet, N. (2012) Aspirin, steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 2. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]

Jones, C., Edwards, R.T. and Hounsome, B. (2012) A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of interventions for supporting informal caregivers of people with dementia residing in the community. International Psychogeriatrics 24(1), 6-18. [Abstract]

Kim, S.Y., Yoo, E.Y., Jung, M.Y., et al. (2012) A systematic review of the effects of occupational therapy for persons with dementia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. NeuroRehabilitation 31(2), 107-115. [Abstract]

Koch, T. Iliffe, S., and Project, F.T. (2010) Rapid appraisal of barriers to the diagnosis and management of patients with dementia in primary care: a systematic review. BMC Family Practice 11(1), 52. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Li, R., Cooper, C., Austin, A. and Livingston, G. (2013) Do changes in coping style explain the effectiveness of interventions for psychological morbidity in family carer of people with dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Psychogeriatrics 25(2), 204-214. [Abstract]

Li, R., Cooper, C., Bradley, J., et al. (2012) Coping strategies and psychological morbidity in family carers of people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders 139(1), 1-11. [Abstract]

Ligthart, S.A., van Charante, E.P., Van Cool, W.A., and Richard, E. (2010) Treatment of cardiovascular risk factors to prevent cognitive decline and dementia: a systematic review. Vascular Health and Risk Management 6, 775-785. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Littbrand, H., Stenvall, M. and Rosendahl, E. (2011) Applicability and effects of physical exercise on physical and cognitive functions and activities of daily living among people with dementia: a systematic review. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 90(6), 495-518. [Abstract]

Loef, M., and Walach, H. (2012) Fruit, vegetables and prevention of cognitive decline or dementia: a systematic review of cohort studies. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging 16(7), 626-630. [Abstract]

Lu, D., Song, H., Hao, Z., et al. (2011) Naftidrofuryl for dementia (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 12. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]

Man, S.C., Chan, K.W., Lu, J.H., et al. (2012) Systematic review on the efficacy and safety of herbal medicines for vascular dementia. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 426215. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Matsuda, Y., Kishi, T., Shibayama, H., and Iwata, N. (2013) Yokukansan in the treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Human Psychopharmacology 28(1), 80-86. [Abstract]

McGuinness, B., O’Hare, J., Craig, D., et al. (2010) Statins for the treatment of dementia (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 8. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]

Mitchell, A.J. and Malladi, S. (2010) Screening and case finding tools for the detection of dementia. Part I: evidence-based meta-analysis of multidomain tests. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 18(9), 759-782. [Abstract]

Mitchell, A.J. and Malladi, S. (2010) Screening and case finding tools for the detection of dementia. Part II: evidence-based meta-analysis of single-domain tests. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 18(9), 783-800. [Abstract]

Moniz Cook, E.D., Swift, K., James, I., et al. (2012) Functional analysis-based interventions for challenging behaviour in dementia (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 2. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]

Nelson, J.C. and Devanand, D.P. (2011) A systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled antidepressant studies in people with depression and dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 59(4), 577-585. [Abstract]

Perry, M., Drašković, I., Lucassen, P., et al. (2010) Effects of educational interventions on primary dementia care: a systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 26(1), 1-11. [Abstract]

Piazza-Gardner, A.K., Gaffud, T.J., and Barry, A.E. (2013) The impact of alcohol on Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review. Aging and Mental Health 17(2), 133-146. [Abstract]

Plassman, B.L., Williams, J.W., Burke, J.R., et al. (2010) Systematic review: factors associated with risk for and possible prevention of cognitive decline in later life. Annals of Internal Medicine 153(3), 182-193. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Potter, R., Ellard, D., Rees, K. and Thorogood, M. (2011) A systematic review of the effects of physical activity on physical functioning, quality of life and depression in older people with dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 16(10), 1000-1011. [Abstract]

Robins Wahlin, T.B. and Byrne, G.J. (2011) Personality changes in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 26(10), 1019-1029. [Abstract]

Rolinski, M., Fox, C., Maidment, I., and McShane, R. (2012) Cholinesterase inhibitors for dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson’s disease dementia and cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 3. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]

Sampson, E.L., Jengaratname, L., and McShane, R. (2012) Metal protein attenuating compounds for the treatment of Alzheimer’s dementia (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 5. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]

Santos, C., Costa, J., Santos, J., et al. (2010) Caffeine intake and dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 20(Suppl 1), S187-204. [Abstract]

Schoenmakers, B., Buntinx, F. and DeLepeleire, J. (2010) Supporting the dementia family caregiver: the effect of home care intervention on general well-being. Aging and Mental Health 14(1), 44-56. [Abstract]

Schoenmakers, B., Buntinx, F., and Delepeleire, J. (2010) Factors determining the impact of care-giving on care-givers of elderly patients with dementia: a systematic literature review. Maturitas 66(2), 191-200. [Abstract]

Seitz, D.P., Adunuri, N., Gill, S.S., et al. (2011) Antidepressants for agitation and psychosis in dementia (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 2. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]

Sharp, S.I., Aarsland, D., Day, S., et al. (2010) Hypertension is a potential risk factor for vascular dementia: systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 26(7), 661-669. [Abstract]

Shub, D., Ball, V., Abbas, A.A., et al. (2010) The link between psychosis and aggression in persons with dementia: a systematic review. Psychiatry Quarterly 81(2), 97-110. [Abstract]

Stern, C. and Munn, Z. (2010) Cognitive leisure activities and their role in preventing dementia: a systematic review. International Journal of Evidence-based Healthcare 8(1), 2-17. [Abstract]

Svanberg, E., Spector, A. and Stott, J. (2010) The impact of young onset dementia on the family: a literature review. International Psychogeriatrics 23(3), 356-371. [Abstract]

van den Dungen, P., Marwijk, H.W., Horst, H.E., et al. (2012) The accuracy of family physicians' dementia diagnoses at different stages of dementia: a systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 27(4), 342-354. [Abstract]

Vernooij-Dassen, M., Draskovic, I., McCleery, J. and Downs, M. (2011) Cognitive reframing for carers of people with dementia (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 11. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]

Wang, B.S., Wang, H., Song, Y.Y., et al. (2010) Effectiveness of standardized ginkgo biloba extract on cognitive symptoms of dementia with a six-month treatment: a bivariate random effect meta-analysis. Pharmacopsychiatry 43(3), 86-91 [Abstract]

Wetzels, R., Zuidema, S., Jansen, I., et al. (2010) Course of neuropsychiatric symptoms in residents with dementia in long-term care institutions: a systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics 22(7), 1040-1053. [Abstract]

Woods, B., Aguirre, E., Spector, A.E., and Orrell, M. (2012) Cognitive stimulation to improve cognitive functioning in people with dementia (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 2. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]

Xiao, Y., Wang, J., Jiang, S., and Luo, H. (2012) Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for vascular dementia (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 7. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]

Yue, J., Dong, B.R., Lin, X., et al. (2012) Huperzine A for mild cognitive impairment (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Issue 12. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]

Primary evidence

Randomized controlled trials published in the major journals since the last revision of this topic:

Banerjee, S., Hellier, J., Dewey, M., et al. (2011) Sertraline or mirtazapine for depression in dementia (HTA-SADD): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 378(9789), 403-411. [Abstract]

Banerjee, S., Hellier, J., Romeo, R., et al. (2013) Study of the use of antidepressants for depression in dementia: the HTA-SADD trial - a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of sertraline and mirtazapine. Health Technology Assessment 17(7). [Free Full-text]

Emre, M., Tsolaki, M., Bonuccelli, U., et al. (2010) Memantine for patients with Parkinson's disease dementia or dementia with Lewy bodies: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurology 9(10), 969-977. [Abstract]

Fox, C., Crugel, M., Maidment, I., et al. (2012) Efficacy of memantine for agitation in Alzheimer's dementia: a randomised double-blind placebo controlled trial. PLoS One 7(5), e35185. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Gitlin, L.N., Winter, L., Dennis, M.P., et al. (2010) A biobehavioral home-based intervention and the well-being of patients with dementia and their caregivers: the COPE randomized trial. JAMA 304(9), 983-991. [Abstract]

Hanney, M., Prasher, V., Williams, N.,et al. (2012) Memantine for dementia in adults older than 40 years with Down’s syndrome (MEADOWS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 379(9815), 528-536. [Abstract]

Johnsen, E., Kroken, R.A., Wentzel-Larsen, T., and Jorgensen,H.A. (2010) Effectiveness of second-generation antispychotics: a naturalistic, randomized comparison of olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. BMC Psychiatry 10, 26. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Quinn, J.F., Raman, R., Thomas, R.G., et al. (2010) Docosahexaenoic acid supplementation and cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease: a randomized trial. JAMA 304(17), 1903-1911. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Meeuwsen, E.J., Melis, R.J.F., Van Der Aa, G.C.H.M., et al. (2012) Effectiveness of dementia follow-up care by memory clinics or general practitioners: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 344, e3086. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Sano, M., Bell, K.L., Galasko, D., et al. (2011) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of simvastatin to treat Alzheimer disease. Neurology 77(6), 556-563. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Waldorff, F.B., Buss, D.V., Eckermann, A., et al. (2012) Efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease: the multicentre, rater blinded, randomised Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY). BMJ 345, e4693. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Observational studies published since the last revision of this topic:

Billioti de Gage, S., Begaud, B., Bazin, F., et al. (2012) Benzodiazepine use and risk of dementia: prospective population based study. BMJ 345, e6231. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Howard, R., McShane, R., Lindesay, J., et al. (2012) Donepezil and memantine for moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease. NEJM 366(10), 893-903. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Li, N.C., Lee, A., Whitmer, R.A., et al. (2010) Use of angiotensin receptor blockers and risk of dementia in a predominantly male population: prospective cohort analysis. BMJ 340, b5465. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Livingstone, G., Leavey, G., Manela, M., et al. (2010) Making decisions for people with dementia who lack capacity: qualitative study of family carers in UK. BMJ 341, c4184. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Llewellyn, D.J., Lang, I.A., Langa, K.M., et al. (2010) Vitamin D and risk of cognitive decline in elderly persons. Archives of Internal Medicine 170(13), 1135-1141. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Muther, J., Abholz, H., Wiese, B., et al. (2010) Are patients with dementia treated as well as patients without dementia for hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidaemia? British Journal of General Practice 60(578), 671-674. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Pariente, A., Fourrier-Reglat, A., Ducruet, T., et al. (2012) Antipsychotic use and myocardial infarction in older patients with treated dementia. Archives of Internal Medicine 172(8), 648-653. [Abstract]

Rait, G., Walters, K., Bottomley, C., et al. (2010) Survival of people with clinical diagnosis of dementia in primary care: a cohort study. BMJ 341, c3584. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Rist, P.M., Kang, J.H., Buring, J.E., et al. (2012) Migraine and cognitive decline among women: prospective cohort study. BMJ 345, e5027. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Ritchie, K., Carrière, I., Ritchie, C.W., et al. (2010) Designing prevention programmes to reduce incidence of dementia: prospective cohort study of modifiable risk factors. BMJ 341, c3885. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Sachs, G.A., Carter, R., Holtz, L.R., et al. (2011) Cognitive impairment: an independent predictor of excess mortality. A cohort study. Annals of Internal Medicine 155(5), 300-308. [Abstract]

A conference statement has been published since the last update of this topic:

Daviglus, M.L., Bell, C.C., Berrettini, W., et al. (2010) National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference statement: preventing Alzheimer disease and cognitive decline. Annals of Internal Medicine 153(3), 176-181. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

New policies

Two new national policies have been published since 1 November 2009.

No health without mental health: a cross-Government mental health outcomes strategy for people of all ages.

Reference: HMG and DH (2011) No health without mental health: a cross-Government mental health outcomes strategy for people of all ages. Department of Health. www.dh.gov.uk [Free Full-text]

DH (2010) Quality outcomes for people with dementia: building on the work of the National Dementia Strategy. Department of Health www.dh.gov.uk [Free Full-text]

New safety alerts

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has advised that:

Several cases of administration error with the new memantine pump device have resulted in overdose.

Confusion has arisen between the dose administered by dropper and the dose administered by the pump.

4 actuations of the pump device is equivalent to 40 drops delivered by the dropper device.

Reference: MHRA (2010) Memantine pump device (Ebixa): risk of medication errors. Drug Safety Update 4(4), A2. [Free Full-text (pdf)]

Novartis has issued a reminder to Healthcare Professionals regarding the correct use of rivastigmine transdermal patches (Exelon®). Cases of overdose have been caused by inappropriate use of the patches.

Instruct patients and carers that:

Only one patch should be applied per day to healthy skin on either the upper or lower back, the upper arm, or the chest.

The patch should be replaced by a new one after 24 hours, and the previous day's patch must be removed before applying a new patch to a different skin location.

To minimize skin irritation, do not apply a patch to the same skin location within 14 days.

The patch should not be cut into pieces.

Reference: Novartis (2010) Direct healthcare professional communication on the inappropriate use of and medication errors associated with Exelon® 4.6 mg/24 h transdermal patch and Exelon® 9.5 mg/24 h transdermal patch. Novartis Pharmaceuticals. www.mhra.gov.uk [Free Full-text (pdf)]

Changes in product availability

No changes in product availability since 1 November 2009.

Goals and outcome measures

Goals

When dementia is suspected, to communicate the possibility of the diagnosis clearly, frankly, and sensitively

To ensure a timely diagnosis

To enable people with dementia to come to terms with and manage their problems

To ensure that primary healthcare is coordinated with secondary healthcare and social care

To promote independence

To ensure symptoms, behavioural problems, and physical disabilities are addressed in partnership with the person and their carers

To ensure the appropriate use and monitoring of drug treatments (especially acetylcholinesterase inhibitors)

To minimize the use of antipsychotic drugs for the control of behaviour

To provide effective psychosocial support for the person's family or carers from the time dementia is first suspected

To ensure effective end-of-life care

GP curriculum statements

GP curriculum statements

GP curriculum statement 9 (Care of older adults) states that GPs looking after older people with mental health problems should 'ensure effective diagnosis, treatment, and support for them and their carers' [RCGP, 2007a].

In particular, GPs must understand:

The special features of psychiatric diseases in old age, including an appreciation of the features of dementia, and the effects of physical function on the mental state.

The prevalence and incidence of disease in the elderly population.

What relevant information to acquire in the history and clinical examination.

How to assess mood, brain function, and mental health in older people, for example, by using standardized questionnaires.

The family and social factors that allow decisions to be taken in context.

How to address multiple complaints and co-morbidity.

How to involve the person, and if appropriate the carers and family, in the management plan.

The structure of the local and national healthcare system, and the role of primary care within the wider NHS.

How to make available to the older patient the appropriate services within the health and social care systems.

How to act as an advocate for the patient.

The legal issues that may arise, such as confidentiality, the Mental Health Act, power of attorney, court of protection, guardianship, living wills, death certification and cremation.

GP curriculum statement 13 (Care of people with mental health problems), Appendix 5, requires primary care practitioners to be alert to the possibility of depression in people with early dementia [RCGP, 2007b].

GP curriculum statement 12 (Care of people with cancer and palliative care) requires GPs to know about end-of-life care, including those in the terminal phases of dementia [RCGP, 2007c].

GP curriculum statement 3.3 (Clinical ethics and values-based practice) requires GPs to be able to justify their decisions with reference to both the clinical evidence and the moral and other values that inform those decisions [RCGP, 2007d].

QOF indicators

Table 1. Indicators related to dementia in the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) of the General Medical Services (GMS) contract.
IndicatorPointsPayment stages
Records
DEM 1The practice can produce a register of patients diagnosed with dementia5
Ongoing management
DEM 2The percentage of patients diagnosed with dementia whose care has been reviewed in the preceding 15 months1535–70%
DEM 4The percentage of patients with a new diagnosis of dementia recorded between the preceding 1 April to 31 March with a record of FBC, calcium, glucose, renal and liver function, thyroid function tests, serum vitamin B12 and folate levels recorded 6 months before or after entering on to the register.645–80%
Data from: [BMA and NHS Employers, 2012]

NICE Quality Standard

People with dementia receive care from staff appropriately trained in dementia care.

People with suspected dementia are referred to a memory assessment service specialising in the diagnosis and initial management of dementia.

People newly diagnosed with dementia and/or their carers receive written and verbal information about their condition, treatment, and the support options in their local area.

People with dementia have an assessment and an ongoing personalised care plan, agreed across health and social care that identifies a named care coordinator and addresses their individual needs.

People with dementia, while they have capacity, have the opportunity to discuss and make decisions, together with their carer/s, about the use of: advance statements, advance decisions to refuse treatment, Lasting Power of Attorney, Preferred Priorities of Care.

Carers of people with dementia are offered an assessment of emotional, psychological, and social needs and, if accepted, receive tailored interventions identified by a care plan to address those needs.

People with dementia who develop non-cognitive symptoms that cause them significant distress, or who develop behaviour that challenges, are offered an assessment at an early opportunity to establish generating and aggravating factors. Interventions to improve such behaviour or distress should be recorded in their care plan.

People with suspected or known dementia using acute and general hospital inpatient services or emergency departments have access to a liaison service that specialises in the diagnosis and management of dementia and older people's mental health.

People in the later stages of dementia are assessed by primary care teams to identify and plan their palliative care needs.

Carers of people with dementia have access to a comprehensive range of respite/short-break services that meet the needs of both the carer and the person with dementia.

[NICE, 2010]

QIPP — Options for local implementation

QIPP — Options for local implementation

Low dose antipsychotics in people with dementia

Review, and where appropriate, revise prescribing of low dose antipsychotics in people with dementia, in accordance with NICE-SCIE guidance, the NICE Quality Standard on dementia, and the Alzheimer's Society best practice guide.

[NICE, 2013]

Background information

Definition

What is it?

Dementia is a triad of problems: memory loss, decline in some other aspect of cognition, and difficulties with activities of daily living.

More formally, dementia is defined as a syndrome (that is, a distinct pattern of symptoms and signs) that can be caused by many brain disorders, most of which progress gradually over several years. Symptoms have usually been present for at least 6 months, and activities of daily living are impaired by the decline in memory and thinking. The symptoms of dementia occur in three groups:

Cognitive dysfunction, resulting in problems with memory, language, attention, thinking, orientation, calculation, and problem-solving.

Psychiatric and behavioural problems, such as changes in personality, emotional control, social behaviour, depression, agitation, hallucinations, and delusions.

Difficulties with activities of daily living, such as driving, shopping, eating, and dressing.

Early-onset (or young-onset) dementia, by convention, is dementia that develops before 65 years of age.

For information on the different types of dementia, see Causes.

[National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007; WHO, 2007; Burns and Iliffe, 2009a]

Causes

What causes it?

The most common causes of dementia are:

Alzheimer's disease (about 50%).

Vascular dementia (about 25%).

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) (about 15%).

Frontotemporal dementia (less than 5%).

Mixed dementias (included in the above estimates).

Mixed dementias include Alzheimer's disease with vascular dementia, and Alzheimer's disease with dementia with Lewy bodies.

All other causes make up less than 5% of the total.

Treatable dementias

A small proportion of people have dementia with a cause that can be treated and the dementia alleviated. For example: some psychiatric disorders; normal pressure hydrocephalus; space-occupying intracranial lesions; syphilis; excessive alcohol consumption; and metabolic and endocrine abnormalities such as vitamin B12 deficiency, folate deficiency, pellagra (niacin deficiency), and hypothyroidism.

Genetic causes of dementia

Genetic causes of dementia are uncommon, and include familial autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, Huntington's disease, and cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL).

The relative proportions of the different causes of dementia differ in younger and older people — see Epidemiology and societal burden.

[National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007]

Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease

Pathophysiology

Alzheimer's disease is a degenerative disease of the cerebral cortex, which causes pathological changes in brain structure and chemistry. The cortex atrophies, amyloid plaques form around and between neurons, and neurofibrillary tangles form inside neurons. Production of acetylcholine is reduced in affected neurons. The cause of Alzheimer's disease is not known.

Clinical features

Typically, the onset is insidious and the condition progresses slowly over 7–10 years.

In the early stages of Alzheimer's disease, people have memory lapses, and forget the names of people, places, and things. They miss appointments and are unable to remember recent events.

As the disease progresses, other symptoms are seen such as difficulties with language, problems with learned movement (apraxia), and difficulties with planning and decision making. The person becomes confused and may have symptoms such as apathy, depression, agitation, disinhibition, psychosis (delusions and hallucinations), wandering, aggression, incontinence, or altered eating habits. These can be challenging problems to manage.

A significant minority of people present with atypical symptoms (such visual problems due to posterior cortical atrophy, or language disturbances).

[Dubois et al, 2007; National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007]

Vascular dementia

Vascular dementia

Pathophysiology

Vascular dementia, or more accurately, vascular cognitive impairment, is the end result of damage to the brain caused by cerebrovascular disease. This can be a major cerebrovascular event such as a stroke, or many unrecognized small strokes (multi-infarcts), or chronic changes in very small blood vessels (subcortical dementia).

Clinical features

Clinical features that can help distinguish vascular dementia from other causes of dementia

The course tends to be a series of stepwise increases in the severity of symptoms. However, subcortical ischaemic vascular dementia often presents insidiously with slowness and attentional problems, personality changes, and gait problems.

There may be focal neurological signs.

Brain imaging shows cortical infarcts, multiple cortical lacunae (holes), and extensive white matter changes.

There is depression, apathy, or other challenging behaviours.

[O'Brien et al, 2003]

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Parkinson's disease dementia

Pathophysiology

Lewy bodies are abnormal microscopic deposits of protein that develop inside nerve cells, and cause a progressive dementia.

Outside the brain stem, Lewy bodies are associated with more profound cholinergic loss than in Alzheimer's disease.

In the brain stem, Lewy bodies are associated with dopaminergic loss and symptoms similar to Parkinson's disease.

People with cognitive symptoms and parkinsonian features developing within 1 year are, by convention, classed as having dementia with Lewy bodies. People with Parkinson's disease who develop dementia after more than 12 months are classed as having Parkinson's disease dementia.

Clinical features

People who have dementia with Lewy bodies have the common features of dementia such as loss of memory, attention deficits, loss of problem solving skills, and deficits in spatial awareness.

Clinical features that distinguish dementia with Lewy bodies from other causes of dementia include:

Fluctuating states of consciousness. Consciousness swings from being alert to being confused with drowsiness, lethargy, staring into space, or disorganized speech. Episodes occur unpredictably, and last from minutes to days.

Visual hallucinations. About 66% of people with dementia with Lewy bodies have recurrent visual hallucinations, which may be pleasant, or extremely distressing for the person and their carers.

Parkinsonian motor problems and autonomic dysfunction. Parkinsonian motor problems include shuffling gait, rigidity, slow movement (bradykinesia), and loss of spontaneous movement. Parkinsonian autonomic dysfunction includes postural hypotension, difficulty in swallowing, and incontinence or constipation.

Disturbances in REM (rapid eye movement) sleep. REM sleep is the normal stage of sleep that is associated with dreaming and loss of muscle tone. People with dementia with Lewy bodies may talk in their sleep, or act out their dreams, and can fall out of bed.

Severe sensitivity to neuroleptic (antipsychotic) drugs. About 50% of people with dementia with Lewy bodies develop severe, and sometimes fatal, reactions to typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs. These may exacerbate extrapyramidal symptoms with increased muscle tone, rigidity, and loss of movement (bradykinesia).

Fainting, falls, problems with swallowing or continence, delusions, depression, and non-visual hallucinations (hearing, smelling, or feeling things).

[McKeith et al, 2005]

Frontotemporal dementia

Frontotemporal dementia

Pathophysiology

Frontotemporal dementia is caused by circumscribed degeneration of the frontal and temporal lobes of the brain. There is atrophy of the prefrontal and anterior temporal neocortex. Four different histological changes have been described and are associated with different clinical features.

A small proportion of people with frontotemporal dementia have Pick disease in which Pick bodies (protein tangles) and ballooned neurons are seen on brain histology. Pick bodies are sometimes found in neurons beyond the frontal and temporal lobes.

Pick disease, and a number of other causes of frontotemporal dementia, are caused by genetic abnormalities.

Clinical features

Frontotemporal dementia develops insidiously. It presents with behavioural disturbances (such as disinhibition or apathy) or with language disturbance (in meaning or fluency). Other cognitive functions are relatively spared in most cases. In some cases, people may develop motor neurone disease associated with frontal lobe dementia, which tends to progress more quickly.

Frontotemporal dementia is, after Alzheimer's disease, the second most common cause of early-onset dementia.

[Neary et al, 2005; National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007]

Risk factors

What are the risk factors for dementia?

Mild cognitive impairment

Mild cognitive impairment is cognitive impairment which does not reach the threshold for dementia and does not interfere with the person's usual daily activities.

People with mild cognitive impairment are up to 15 times more likely to develop Alzheimer's disease than those with normal cognition. It is not possible to reliably distinguish the mild cognitive impairment associated with normal aging from that due to the preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease.

People with mild cognitive impairment due to cerebrovascular disease are also at increased risk of dementia. Dementia develops as a result of brain damage from further cerebrovascular events (multiple mini-strokes, or one or more clinically evident strokes).

A meta-analysis of 41 studies found that the annual conversion rate from mild cognitive impairment to dementia was 5–10%; most people with mild cognitive impairment do not progress to dementia even after 10 years of follow up [Mitchell and Shiri-Feshki, 2009].

Down's syndrome and other learning disorders

People with Down's syndrome develop the amyloid plaques in the cortex associated with Alzheimer's disease, but not all develop the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. The prevalence of dementia in people with Down's syndrome increases from 2% in the age group 30–39 years, to 10% of those aged 40–49 years, 35% in those aged 50–59 years, and 55% in those aged 60–69 years [Prasher, 1995]. The peak incidence of dementia is around 55 years of age [British Psychological Society, 2009].

People with other types of learning disorder are also more likely to develop dementia than the general population. The prevalence of dementia in people with other forms of learning disorder is 15% for those 65–74 years of age, 25% for those aged 75–84 years, and 70% for those aged 85–94 years. This is about four times higher than in the general population [Cooper, 1997].

Risk factors for cardiovascular disease

Risk factors for cardiovascular disease are also risk factors for all types of dementia. Many can potentially be modified, including smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and increased cholesterol. However, there is no direct evidence that modifying these risk factors reduces the risk of dementia [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

History of severe psychiatric problems

People who have (or have had) a severe psychiatric problem such as depression or schizophrenia are at increased risk of dementia (odds ratio for any previous psychiatric problem 3.1, 95% CI 1.5 to 4.8) [Cooper and Holmes, 1998]. The reason for the association is not known.

Genetic causes of dementia

A family history of dementia is common, but is only rarely due to a dominantly-inherited condition such as familial autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease, Pick disease and other causes of frontotemporal dementia, Huntington's disease, and cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL).

Lower educational attainments and lower intelligence quotient (IQ) scores

A number of studies in different cultures have found that lower educational attainment and lower IQ scores are associated with higher risks of developing dementia [Zhang et al, 1990; Canadian Study of Health and Aging, 1994; Snowdon et al, 1996; Schmand et al, 1997].

Lack of exercise

Several studies have found an association between reduced physical activity and increased risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease [Rovio et al, 2005; Larson et al, 2006; Sumic et al, 2007; Andel et al, 2008; Middleton et al, 2008].

Limited social network

Reduced engagement in social and educational activities is associated with increased risk of dementia [Fratiglioni et al, 2000; Wang et al, 2002; Verghese et al, 2003].

Prognosis

What is the prognosis?

Dementia has an insidious onset, and slow progression. People may take 12–18 months from the first appearance of symptoms to when they first present to their general practitioner (GP); it then may take a similar length of time for the diagnosis to be made [Iliffe et al, 2009b]. Early diagnosis allows the person to plan ahead while they still have the capacity to make decisions about their future care.

The prognosis depends on the cause of the dementia, and varies from person to person since the course of the condition and pattern of symptoms varies. Some people with dementia live for many years, but on average people live for about 5 years from when symptoms were first recognized and about 3.5 years from the time of diagnosis. Early-onset dementia tends to progress more rapidly [Iliffe et al, 2009c].

As it develops, dementia results in increasingly severe loss of memory or other cognitive functions, and psychological and behavioural problems can be difficult to manage. Almost all people with dementia eventually develop one or more psychological or behavioural problems, which include language difficulties, disorientation, psychiatric symptoms (such as apathy, depression, psychosis), and personality and behavioural changes (including aggression, sleep disturbance, sexual apathy, or, rarely, disinhibited sexual behaviour).

Consequences of dementia

What are the consequences of dementia?

Dementia gives rise to a number of clinical and social problems for the person, which present carers and social care staff with complex issues [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007]. The problems can be grouped into three (partly overlapping) categories: disabilities, health problems, and social problems.

Disabilities

Difficulties with activities of daily living. This starts with activities such as shopping, maintaining the home, personal care, and compliance with medication; then progresses to loss of mobility, inability to toilet alone, and self-neglect.

Physical or neurological disabilities.

Sensory impairment.

Communication difficulties.

Health problems

Problems with nutrition and loss of weight.

Poor oral health.

Incontinence, difficulty swallowing, and other functional health problems.

Mobility problems leading to falls and injuries.

Acute confusional episodes (due to physical illness or medication).

Social problems

Financial stress can occur if the person with dementia loses their job as a result of their symptoms or the carer has to give up their job to look after them. This is particularly important for people with young-onset dementia. Informal carers bear 36% of the total cost of caring for dementia [Alzheimer's Society, 2007].

Psychological stress occurs when carers or family bear most of the burden of looking after the person with dementia at home. Approximately one in three carers develop a psychological condition such as depression [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

Concerns about the risk of inheriting the condition.

Epidemiology and societal burden

How common is dementia, and what is its burden on society?

Incidence of dementia

The incidence of dementia in people older than 65 years of age is about nine people in 1000 each year [Copeland et al, 1992].

Prevalence of dementia

In the UK in 2007, dementia was estimated to affect about 700,000 people and cost about £17 billion a year.

The number of people with dementia is increasing and is forecast to reach about 950,000 in 2021.

Dementia is most common in older people, the prevalence increasing with age:

1.5% in people aged 65–69 years.

2.4% in people aged 70–74 years.

6% in people aged 75–79 years.

13.3% in people aged 80–84 years.

20% in people aged 85–89 years.

Dementia can affect people of any age, but early-onset dementia (before 65 years of age) is uncommon — it accounts for 2% of all people with dementia in the UK.

The prevalence of severe dementia increases with age, from 6% (for people 65–69 years of age) to almost 25% (for people 95 years of age or older).

Overall, the prevalence of dementia is about the same in men and women, but Alzheimer’s disease is more common in women (67% compared with 55% in men), and vascular dementia and mixed dementias are more common in men (31% compared with 25% in women).

About two in three people with dementia live at home.

About one in three people with dementia live alone.

In a practice with an average demographic profile, a general practitioner (GP) with 1500–2000 people on their list will have around 12–20 people with dementia, about half of whom have not been formally diagnosed [DH, 2009a].

Societal burden of dementia

The cost of care for people with dementia is greater than the combined costs of care for people with cancer, stroke, and heart disease.

[Alzheimer's Society, 2007; Iliffe et al, 2009b; Luengo-Fernandez et al, 2010]

Prevention

Can dementia be prevented?

No treatments are known to reduce the risk of dementia.

The potentially modifiable risk factors for dementia are those for cardiovascular disease (including smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, obesity, lack of exercise, diabetes, hypertension, and increased serum cholesterol). However, CKS found no good direct evidence that interventions to modify risk factors for cardiovascular disease reduce the risk of dementia. These interventions should therefore not be recommended primarily to reduce the risk of dementia. Nevertheless, when advising people to reduce their cardiovascular risk, reduced risk of dementia should be given as a likely additional benefit.

There are separate CKS topics on the management of each of these risk factors. For more information, also see the CKS topic on CVD risk assessment and management.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommends that the following interventions should not be prescribed as specific treatments for the primary prevention of dementia [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007]:

Statins.

Hormone replacement therapy.

Vitamin E.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Early diagnosis and intervention

Early diagnosis and intervention

The World Alzheimer Report 2011, produced by Alzheimer's Disease International emphasizes the importance of early diagnosis and intervention in people with dementia [Alzheimer's Disease International, 2011a; Alzheimer's Disease International, 2011b]. The report:

States that early diagnosis:

Allows the person to plan ahead while they still have the capacity to make decisions about their future care.

Enables the person and their family to receive timely practical information, advice and support. Evidence suggests that when the person and their families are well prepared and supported they have a sense of reassurance and empowerment after the initial shock, anger and grief following diagnosis.

Allows access to available drug and non-drug treatments which may improve cognition, improve quality of life and delay institutionalisation.

Estimates that most people with dementia do not have a formal diagnosis. In high income countries such as the UK, it is estimated that between 20% and 50% of people with dementia do not have the diagnosis documented in primary care. In low income countries this figure may be as high as 90%. Barriers to diagnosis include:

The stigma of dementia which prevents open discussion.

False belief that memory loss is a normal part of ageing.

False belief that nothing can be done for people with dementia.

Recommends:

Practice-based educational programmes in primary care.

The introduction of accessible diagnostic and early stage dementia care services (memory clinics).

Promoting effective interaction between different sections of the health service who work with people with dementia.

Accepts the lack of available evidence about the effects of interventions in early stage dementia, and conclude that randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate:

The long and short term benefits of drug interventions, psychological interventions, physical activity programmes and nutritional supplementation.

The optimal timing of effective care-giver interventions including information, education, training and support from the time of diagnosis to early to mid-stage dementia.

Informed consent

What do I need to know about informed consent?

People with dementia should be given the opportunity to make informed decisions about their care and treatment.

When seeking informed consent for a treatment or intervention:

Explain the advantages and disadvantages of the different options to the person.

Confirm that the person:

Understands the options.

Does not feel pressured.

Continues to consent over time.

If the person lacks the capacity to make a decision, follow the provisions of the Mental Capacity Act, 2005 and its code of practice.

Involving carers and relatives

People with dementia should have their opinion sought on who they would like (or not like) to be involved in their care.

With the permission of the person with dementia, carers and relatives should normally have the opportunity to be involved in decisions about care and treatment, and be provided with the necessary information and support.

[BMA, 2007; Nicholson et al, 2008; BMA, 2009]

The Mental Capacity Act 2005

What do I need to know about the mental capacity act 2005?

The Mental Capacity Act 2005 applies in England and Wales.

The Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 applies in Scotland.

In Northern Ireland, common law applies.

[Office of the Public Guardian, 2005; BMA, 2007; Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2007; BMA, 2008; Nicholson et al, 2008; BMA, 2009]

Key principles

The Mental Capacity Act 2005 has five key principles:

Presumption of capacity. Adults should always be presumed to have the capacity to make a decision, unless the healthcare professional can prove otherwise.

Maximizing decision-making capacity. The person must be given all practical support before it can be decided that they lack capacity. Support may involve extra time for assessment, repeating the assessment if capacity fluctuates, or using an interpreter, sign language, or pictures.

The freedom to make seemingly unwise decisions. If the person makes a seemingly unwise decision, this in itself is not proof of incapacity. Proof of incapacity depends on the process by which the decision is made, not the decision itself.

Best interests. Any decision or action taken on behalf of the person must be in their best interests. If the decision can be delayed until the person regains capacity, then it should be. A decision taken on another's behalf should take account of their wishes, including those expressed in an advance decision, and their beliefs and values. The decision-making process should involve, when appropriate, family, carers, and friends.

The least restrictive alternative. When a decision is made on the person's behalf, the healthcare professional must choose the alternative that interferes least with the individual's rights and freedoms while still achieving the necessary goal.

[Office of the Public Guardian, 2005; BMA, 2007; BMA, 2008; Nicholson et al, 2008; BMA, 2009]

Assessing mental capacity to make a decision

Who should assess mental capacity to make a decision?

A healthcare professional (or anyone else) who wishes to make a decision on behalf of an incapacitated person must assess and document their current mental capacity. The more serious the decision, the more formal the assessment of capacity should be. For major decisions where there is any doubt, consider obtaining an expert second opinion, for example from a psychiatrist specializing in the care of the elderly.

How should mental capacity to make a decision be assessed?

Mental capacity to make a decision must be assessed for each decision at the time it is made. The person may have capacity to make less serious decisions (such as what to eat for breakfast) but may lack capacity for more serious decisions (such as about treatment and financial affairs).

Capacity should be re-assessed if the person's condition changes.

To assess capacity, confirm that the person has an impairment of the mind or brain, and that this means the person is unable to:

Understand what decision they need to make and why they need to make it, or

Understand the likely consequences of making, or not making, the decision, or

Unable to understand, retain, use, and weigh up the information relevant to the decision, or

Communicate their decision (even with the help of a translator or speech and language therapist when appropriate).

[Office of the Public Guardian, 2005; BMA, 2007; BMA, 2008; Nicholson et al, 2008; BMA, 2009]

Lasting power of attorney

The Mental Capacity Act 2005 provides the legal framework to enable someone to give a named person the authority to make decisions on their behalf. This authority is called a 'lasting power of attorney', and replaces what was previously called an 'enduring power of attorney'. The person giving the power of attorney is called the 'donor'; the person receiving the power of attorney is called the 'donee' or 'attorney'.

The lasting power of attorney agreement specifies the limits ('nature and effect') of the powers granted to the attorney to make decisions about:

Property and affairs.

Lasting power of attorney agreements about property and affairs can take effect before the donor has lost mental capacity.

Personal welfare, including healthcare and social care.

Lasting power of attorney agreements about personal welfare can only take effect after the donor has lost mental capacity.

The donee has no authority to make decisions about life-sustaining treatment unless they are described in a lasting power of attorney that specifies that it is to apply even when life is at risk, and it has been signed and witnessed.

Decisions made under authority of a lasting power of attorney must be in the person's best interests.

When there are important concerns relating to decisions taken under the authority of a lasting power of attorney, the case can be referred to the Court of Protection.

To be valid, lasting power of attorney documents must be registered with the Office of the Public Guardian.

[Office of the Public Guardian, 2005; BMA, 2007; Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2007; BMA, 2008; Nicholson et al, 2008; BMA, 2009]

Court of Protection; court appointed deputy.

The Court of Protection has powers and status similar to those of the High Court. It has the power to:

Decide whether the person has the capacity to make a particular decision for themselves.

Make declarations, decisions, or orders on financial or welfare matters affecting people who lack capacity to make such decisions.

Appoint deputies to make decisions for people lacking capacity to make those decisions.

Hear cases and decide whether a power of attorney can be registered or is valid.

Remove a deputy or attorney who has failed to carry out their duties.

The Court of Protection can authorize a 'statutory will' to be drawn up on behalf of someone who lacks capacity and has not drawn up a will.

The court-appointed deputy is likely to be a family member, or, if there is no appropriate person, the director of social services. Although healthcare decisions can be lawfully made without a deputy, they can nonetheless be useful where disputes over care and treatment arise. The deputy can consent on the person's behalf to all health and welfare decisions that will not shorten the person's life. They cannot refuse consent to life-sustaining treatment.

[Office of the Public Guardian, 2005; BMA, 2007; Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2007; BMA, 2008; Nicholson et al, 2008; BMA, 2009]

Advance decisions

Advance decisions (also called advance directives or living wills):

Allow the person to specify (before they have lost capacity to decide) what treatments they would not want and would not consent to.

Cannot demand treatments.

Must be respected by clinicians.

Can be withdrawn if the person regains capacity.

Can be made verbally, except for decisions that refuse life-sustaining treatment (such as artificial ventilation), which must be written, signed, and witnessed.

Cannot refuse basic care such as the provision of warmth, shelter, and hygiene. This includes food for eating and water for drinking, but not artificial nutrition and hydration.

Clinicians are responsible for finding out if a valid advance decision exists.

An advance refusal of treatment is binding if:

The person making the advance decision was at least 18 years of age, and had the necessary mental capacity.

It specifies treatment to be refused, and the applicable circumstances.

It has not been withdrawn.

Nobody has subsequently been given power of attorney to make treatment decisions on the person's behalf.

The person making the advance decision has not subsequently given reason to believe that they have changed their mind.

The legal framework for advance decisions is provided by The Mental Capacity Act 2005, which also provides for resolution of disputes and disagreements about advance decisions.

The Mental Health Act 2007 introduced safeguards on the deprivation of liberty into the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

[Office of the Public Guardian, 2005; BMA, 2007; Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2007; BMA, 2008; Nicholson et al, 2008; BMA, 2009]

Independent mental capacity advocate

Independent mental capacity advocate services are commissioned from independent organizations by the NHS and local authorities.

Independent mental capacity advocates do not make decisions on behalf of the person who lacks capacity. They support people who lack capacity and who do not have anyone else to represent them, by reviewing proposed decisions with care staff, and ensuring that all options are considered, the person's preferences are taken into account, and their rights are upheld.

A healthcare or social care professional looking after people lacking mental capacity must involve the independent mental capacity advocate services when considering a major decision about:

Medical interventions and long-term care.

Making arrangements to spend more than 4 weeks in hospital or 8 weeks in a care home.

Adult protection.

[Office of the Public Guardian, 2005; BMA, 2007; Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2007; BMA, 2008; Nicholson et al, 2008; BMA, 2009; DH, 2009b]

Screening, diagnosis, and assessment

Dementia screening, diagnosis, and assessment

360months3060monthsBoth2010-03-22

Screening

Who should be screened for dementia?

Screening for dementia is not recommended for the general population, but healthcare professionals should be aware of the increased risk of dementia in people with Down's syndrome and other learning disabilities, after a stroke, and in Parkinson's disease.

Adults with Down's syndrome

Baseline cognitive function should be documented while the person is healthy.

Prospective screening for dementia may be considered for people with Down's syndrome when they reach 40–50 years of age.

Adults with Down's syndrome should be assessed for dementia after concerns have been raised.

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are from the Dementia guidelines published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007], and the guidelines on Dementia and people with learning disabilities published by the British Psychological Society [British Psychological Society, 2009].

NICE concluded, on the basis of a systematic review, that there is no simple, accurate, and cost-effective method for identifying people with early dementia through population screening, although there may be a case for targeted screening of sub-populations [Boustani et al, 2003].

The guidelines from the British Psychological Society recommend that services for people with learning disabilities should 'establish a baseline for every adult with Down's syndrome while they are healthy; and provide reactive screening, i.e. assessing for dementia in any adult with learning disabilities after concerns have been raised; and they may consider undertaking prospective screening for adults with Down's syndrome at intervals from the age of 40 or 50 onwards' [British Psychological Society, 2009].

Establishing a baseline is recommended because there is no objective test for dementia, and the diagnosis requires establishing that there has been a deterioration with respect to a known baseline.

Reactive screening is recommended (on the basis of expert opinion) because carers do not always notice declining cognitive function.

Considering regular screening is recommended because the risks of dementia and undetected treatable illnesses are high in comparison with the general population.

Suspecting dementia

When should I suspect dementia?

Dementia may present with memory problems or with other symptoms.

Suspect dementia if, when you ask the person a simple question, they immediately turn to their partner — the so-called head-turning sign.

Suspect dementia when relatives are concerned about the person's memory or behaviour, but they themselves are not.

Suspect dementia when any of the following are reported (by the person or by someone close to them) to be new or deteriorating problems:

Cognitive symptoms

Memory problems such as forgetfulness, repetitive questioning, difficulty finding names and other words, not knowing common facts.

Misunderstanding spoken and written communication.

Disorientation.

Challenging behaviours, psychiatric symptoms, and personality changes

Withdrawal or apathy.

Depression, agitation, anxiety.

Blunting of emotions and disinterest, social withdrawal.

Disinhibition, inappropriate friendliness, flirtatiousness.

Suspiciousness, fearfulness, aggression, psychosis (delusions, hallucinations).

Insomnia.

Restlessness, wandering, agitation, noisiness.

Neurological symptoms

Gait disturbances, apraxia (loss of ability to perform learned purposeful movements).

Difficulties with activities of daily life

Difficulty with orientation, getting lost, loss of driving skills.

Taking prescribed drugs erratically — for example uncharacteristic variations in INR (international normalized ratio) in a person normally taking stable doses of warfarin.

Forgetting recipes when cooking, neglecting household chores, trouble with shopping, difficulty handling money.

Neglecting hygiene or self-care, deterioration in personal appearance, or a reduction in social roles.

Making mistakes at work.

None of these symptoms or signs are specific for dementia. If dementia is suspected, further assessment of cognition and function is required to confirm the diagnosis.

Early recognition of dementia is a challenge

Early recognition of dementia is a challenge

Early recognition is not easy. This is because:

The onset is insidious and symptoms are variable.

The clinical picture depends on the type of disease process and areas of the brain most affected, and to an extent on the personality of the individual.

The person and those close to them may have different understandings of the presence or absence of symptoms, disabilities, and vulnerabilities; and they may have different ideas of the need for support.

The symptoms can be due to other causes — for example psychiatric illness, adverse effects of medication, normal ageing, confusional states, and medical conditions.

The impact on daily life depends on the support from carers and other environmental factors.

If family members or carers protect the person from difficulties with activities of daily living and social roles, recognizing dementia is likely to be delayed until symptoms are severe, or the support is removed (for example when the person's partner becomes ill).

People with a cognitively demanding job will experience disabilities earlier than those with a cognitively undemanding job or people in care homes.

Diagnosis can be delayed if healthcare professionals are reluctant to consider the diagnosis, or if the person and their family are reluctant to seek help for a condition they perceive as stigmatizing and largely untreatable. People with high educational attainment may delay presenting until dementia is advanced.

Learning resource

The Alzheimer's Society (www.alzheimers.org.uk) has developed a CD-based tutorial on the timely recognition and diagnosis of dementia for GPs.

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations reflect the Dementia guideline published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

Additional information was obtained from EVIDEM (Evidence-based interventions in dementia: changing practice in dementia care in the community: developing and testing interventions from early recognition to end of life), research funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research.

Confirming the diagnosis

How do I know my patient has it?

The diagnosis of dementia is a process that may require several consultations to gather sufficient information. In the early stages of dementia, this process can be prolonged, and the assessments repeated. Although the diagnosis of dementia needs to be confirmed by a specialist, general practitioners can decide if dementia is unlikely or likely, and before referral start exploring and addressing the concerns of the person and their family or carer, and ensuring that people with dementia are given the opportunity to make informed decisions about their care and treatment.

When dementia is suspected:

Discuss the possibility of dementia; explain why more detailed assessments are advised, and ask the person if they would like to know the diagnosis and who else they would like to be involved and informed. Raise the possibility sensitively, perhaps at a subsequent consultation, as many people will be devastated.

Do routine investigations and exclude other conditions such as normal ageing, mild cognitive impairment, depression, and acute delirium (due to infection, biochemical imbalance, excessive consumption of alcohol, and drugs [including over-the-counter products]).

When the onset of memory problems is sudden, consider a vascular event; when the onset is sub-acute, suspect an infection (or other cause of acute confusion/delirium), especially if there is alteration in level of consciousness.

Take a focused history from the person and, with their permission, an informant who is close to them. Assess the person's functional capacity, their ability to drive safely, and if they have any physical needs (such as nutrition, hearing, eyesight, mobility, and continence).

Assess cognition, including attention and concentration, orientation, short and long-term memory, ability to carry out learned purposeful movements, language, and executive function (planning, reasoning, decision-making). Use a standardized, validated instrument to assess for cognitive impairment.

Cognitive screening tests are not diagnostic. Although they can help decide who should be referred for specialist assessment, they are not sufficiently accurate to confirm a diagnosis of dementia.

Standardized instruments include the 6-item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT), the General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG), the Mini-Cog Assessment Instrument, the Memory Impairment Screen (MIS), and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE).

The choice of which instrument to use depends on convenience in administration and scoring, availability, and consistency in the local area. An automated version of the 6-CIT is available on some general practitioner (GP) computer systems. The MMSE is commonly used in specialist services, but other tests that are faster to administer may be more practical in primary care. Most of the cognitive screening tests are not in the public domain, and test forms must be purchased. Consistent use of the same test in the catchment area of the local memory assessment service would facilitate communication between different professionals and with the person.

Scores from cognitive screening tests require clinical judgement for interpretation, as they can be affected by factors such as educational level, skills, language, impairment of hearing or vision, depression and other psychiatric illnesses, and physical or neurological problems.

If assessment of cognition suggests mild cognitive impairment (including people with no loss of memory), consider referral to a specialist memory assessment service for assessment and monitoring.

If assessment of cognition and function suggests that dementia is possible:

Provide information, advice, and psychological support to help the person cope.

Refer the person to a specialist memory assessment service. This allows dementia to be confirmed (or ruled out), its probable cause (or causes) to be established, a care plan to be drawn up, and any appropriate drug treatment started (acetylcholinesterase inhibitors should be started by a specialist). Other reasons for referral include uncertainty about the diagnosis, request from the person or their family for a consultation with a specialist, and participation in research trials of new treatments. Where available, refer people with early-onset dementia to the regional specialist service, as they have particular needs and a wider differential diagnosis. People whose symptoms progress rapidly or who have neurological abnormalities on examination should be referred for expert neurological opinion as they may have a treatable cause.

General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG)

The General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG) test is available to do online. It is also available in online files suitable for printing in English (pdf), French, Italian, Greek, German, Spanish, Mandarin, and Cantonese; see the GPCOG website www.gpcog.com.au.

GPCOG test scores are interpreted as:

Score of 9 — no significant cognitive impairment and further testing is not necessary.

Score of 5–8 — more information is required. Proceed with Step 2, the informant section.

Score of 0–4 — cognitive impairment is suggested.

Step 2, the informant section. If the score on Step 1 is 5–8, this part of the GPCOG should be completed by an informant who has known the person well for some years. It has six questions that assess how the person is now compared to when they were well, for example 5–10 years ago.

If the informant's score is less than 4 (out of 6), cognitive impairment is suggested.

Memory Impairment Screen (MIS)

The Memory Impairment Screen (MIS) takes about 5 minutes to administer.

The MIS contains four items, which test recall (delayed and cued).

The Albert Einstein College of Medicine owns the copyright to the MIS; it makes the test available as a service to the research community but licenses it for commercial use.

Mini-Cog Assessment Instrument

To administer the Mini-Cog Assessment Instrument

Explain to the person that they should listen carefully to and remember three unrelated words. The three words are then spoken to them, and the person is asked to repeat the words.

Ask the person to mark, on a circle, the hours of a clock then draw the minute and hour hands to show 11:10.

Ask the person to repeat again the three words that they were given at the start.

To interpret the Mini-Cog Assessment Instrument

Give 1 point for each word the person correctly remembers after the clock drawing test. Consider the clock drawing test to be normal if all numbers are present in the correct sequence and position, and the hands display the requested time.

Interpret a score of zero as suggestive of dementia.

Interpret scores of 1 or 2 with abnormal clock drawing test as suggestive of dementia.

Interpret scores of 1 or 2 with normal clock drawing test as a negative screen for dementia.

Interpret a score of 3 as a negative screen for dementia.

MMSE

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) tests orientation (for time and place), registration (ability to repeat the names of three objects), attention and calculation (counting backwards by seven), recall (ability to repeat the names of the three objects), language (reading and writing), and copying a complex drawing.

The MMSE can be purchased online at www.parinc.com.

The six item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT)

To administer the six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)

Ask: What year is it?

Score 4 if incorrect.

Ask: What month is it?

Score 3 if incorrect.

Say: 'Repeat after me: John / Smith / 42 / High Street / Bedford'

Ask: About what time is it?

Score 3 if more than 1 hour wrong.

Ask: Count backwards from 20 to 1.

Score 2 if one mistake; score 4 if two or more mistakes.

Ask: Say the months of the year in reverse.

Score 2 if one mistake; score 4 if two or more mistakes.

Ask: Repeat the address phrase requested earlier.

Score 2 for each mistake; maximum score 10 for five mistakes.

Assess the test as suggestive of dementia if the total score is 8 or more.

A computerized version of the 6-CIT with automated scoring is available on some general practice computer systems.

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are from the Dementia guidelines published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

Basis for which cognitive test to use

NICE recommends that a standardized scoring system be used to assess cognitive impairment.

The 6-item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) was found to have sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 100% for score 8 or more [Brooke and Bullock, 1999].

The General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG) was found to have sensitivities of 82% for the person's score of 8 or more and 89% for an informant's score of 5 or more. The specificities were 70% for the person's score of 8 or more and 66% for the informant's score of 5 or more [Brodaty et al, 2002; Ismail et al, 2009].

The Mini-Cog was found to have a sensitivity of 95%; its diagnostic value was not influenced by education or language [Borson et al, 2000; Ismail et al, 2009].

The Memory Impairment Screen was found to have a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 96%; positive predictive values were 85% when the prevalence of dementia was 20%, and 54% when the prevalence of dementia was 5% [Buschke et al, 1999; Ismail et al, 2009].

The Test Your Memory (TYM) Test is not recommended by CKS. It was found to have a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 86% in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease; the positive and negative predictive values were 42% and 99% respectively when the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease was 10% [Brown et al, 2009; Brown, 2009a; Brown, 2009b]. The authors advise 'the TYM test is provided at present on a trial basis. Until further work has been completed it should not be used routinely in clinical practice.'

The Abbreviated Mental Test is not recommended by CKS because it was not considered by NICE, and performs less well than the GPCOG [Brodaty et al, 2002].

Basis for referral

NICE guidelines state that acetylcholinesterase inhibitors should be started by a specialist.

Differential diagnosis

What else might it be?

Dementia needs to be distinguished from:

Normal ageing

Normal ageing is associated with a mild decline in cognitive function. In dementia, the cognitive impairment is more severe and global, and results in clinically significant functional disability.

Lapses of memory are common, especially when there is physical illness or stress. If in doubt about the significance of memory lapses, offer to review in 3 months, and if possible, get independent corroboration by a close informant who may be able to give a history of insidious decline (suggestive of early Alzheimer's disease) or of variability related to stress or anxiety.

Mild cognitive impairment

In mild cognitive impairment the person notices memory problems, which ideally are confirmed by a relative or associate. However, the memory problems do not interfere with activities of daily life or social and occupational functioning, and general cognition is preserved.

Depression

It is important to recognize depression because it is common, treatable, and can present with features similar to those of dementia.

In comparison with dementia, the onset of depressive symptoms may be more rapid. Depression may become evident over a few weeks or months, while the symptoms of dementia may have been present for several months by the time the person presents to the healthcare professional.

Depression can coexist with dementia, and if both are new diagnoses, depression should usually be treated and controlled before managing the dementia.

For more information on diagnosis and treatment, see the CKS topic on Depression.

Delirium/acute confusional state

It is important to recognize delirium (or acute confusional state) because it is common and treatable.

In comparison with non-vascular dementia, the onset of symptoms are more rapid (over a few hours or days).

Symptoms generally worsen at night, with increased confusion, disorientation, and emotional disturbance (fear, irritability, aggression). Paranoia and hallucinations (visual or auditory) are common.

Common causes of delirium include chest infection, urinary tract infection, adverse effects of drugs, biochemical imbalance, and alcohol withdrawal.

Delirium can coexist with dementia, and if both are new diagnoses, delirium should usually be treated and controlled before managing the dementia.

Parkinson’s disease versus Lewy body dementia

People with dementia due to Parkinson's disease may be on one end of a spectrum that has dementia with Lewy bodies at the other end.

By convention, Parkinson's disease dementia is diagnosed if the motor symptoms appear more than 12 months before the cognitive symptoms.

Drugs that can cause confusion

Psychoactive drugs are the commonest causes of drug-induced cognitive impairment and delirium. The main ones are:

Hypnotics/sedatives — high doses of benzodiazepines (for example greater than 5 mg/day of diazepam), and use of long-acting drugs (such as flurazepam and diazepam) are associated with delirium.

Longer-acting benzodiazepines cause delirium more commonly than shorter-acting benzodiazepines.

Sudden withdrawal from a short-acting benzodiazepine, such as lorazepam, is also a common cause of delirium.

Analgesics — opioid analgesics (such as oral morphine and high doses of codeine) can cause confusion in the elderly. Much more rarely:

Aspirin, indometacin, and sulindac can cause paranoid psychosis and delirium.

Naproxen and ibuprofen can cause significant disturbances of memory and concentration.

Antipsychotics — some antipsychotic drugs have considerable antimuscarinic (anticholinergic) activity which may cause or worsen delirium.

Chlorpromazine and clozapine have potent antimuscarinic (anticholinergic) effects.

Delirium is uncommon in newer antipsychotics (such as risperidone), but has been reported.

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) should be considered when delirium develops in people taking antipsychotics. Symptoms of NMS include muscle rigidity and fluctuating consciousness.

Anti-Parkinsonian drugs — delirium occurs in about 5% of people taking levodopa, 11–33% of people taking pergolide, and 12% of those taking bromocriptine.

It is also common in those taking amantadine and selegiline.

Antidepressants — confusion is most common with tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), such as amitriptyline and imipramine, as they have significant anticholinergic actions.

Desipramine, lofepramine, trazodone, and nortriptyline have less anticholinergic activities and are more appropriate for elderly people.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) rarely cause cognitive impairment or delirium. However, a state of delirium, autonomic instability, and rigidity (serotonin syndrome) can occur when an SSRI is combined with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor, clomipramine, or selegiline.

Antidepressants can have central antimuscarinic (anticholinergic) effects, causing confusion, disorientation, agitation, memory problems, and other symptoms found in dementia.

Centrally-acting antimuscarinic (anticholinergic) drugs (for example TCAs, benztropine, and phenothiazines [haloperidol]) can cause confusion, disorientation, agitation, memory problems, and other symptoms found in dementia.

Anticonvulsants — all anticonvulsants can impair cognitive function.

Maximal cognitive deficits are seen with older anticonvulsants such as phenytoin, primidone, and phenobarbital. Phenytoin has been linked to the development of delirium and dementia.

Newer anticonvulsants, such as sodium valproate and carbamazepine, cause mild deficits.

Non psychoactive drugs — drug-induced confusion is often peculiar to the individual and the diagnosis is easily missed. Examples include:

Antisecretory drugs and mucosal protectants — histamine H2-receptor antagonists (such as cimetidine) have been associated with acute central nervous system (CNS) toxicity, including delirium. This may be due to their anticholinergic effects.

Proton pump inhibitors (such as omeprazole) have also been associated with delirium.

Cardiac drugs — digoxin can cause cognitive impairment at normal serum levels, as well as with excessive doses. Toxicity in the elderly manifests as CNS symptoms such as delirium.

Class 1A antiarrhythmics (such as disopyramide, quinidine, and procainamide) have significant anticholinergic effects and can cause delirium.

Calcium antagonists, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and amiodarone can cause idiosyncratic episodes of delirium.

Methyldopa has been reported to cause impaired mental functioning and delirium.

Some beta blockers, including topical timolol, have been reported to cause chronic cognitive impairment and pseudodementia.

Corticosteroids — chronic cognitive impairment, and deficits in attention, concentration, and memory, as well as delirium has been reported with corticosteroids.

Psychiatric disturbance is dose-related (the greater the dose, the greater the effects).

Antibiotics — there have been numerous cases of delirium following treatment with penicillins, cephalosporins, and quinolones.

Inhibition of GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid) neurotransmitters has been implicated as a mechanism for delirium caused by fluoroquinolones and penicillins.

Drug interactions and toxicity — concomitant medications increase the chances of drug interactions and drug-induced confusion.

In elderly people, drugs may be metabolized and excreted more slowly and their distribution in the various body compartments can change. Therefore, CNS toxicity can occur with normal doses or within the normal therapeutic plasma levels of drugs, and present as dementia or delirium.

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are from the Dementia guideline published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

The information about the drugs that can cause dementia was summarized from a review article [Moore and O'Keefe, 1999].

Investigations

What investigations should I do when assessing someone for dementia?

Routine investigations

When assessing people with suspected dementia, do the following tests to exclude other conditions:

Full blood count.

Urea, electrolytes, calcium, and glucose concentrations, and liver function tests.

Thyroid function tests.

Serum vitamin B12 and folate levels.

Non-routine investigations

These tests should be done only when warranted by the clinical situation:

Midstream urine culture — for example if delirium due to urinary tract infection is a possibility.

Chest radiography — for example if delirium due to chest infection is a possibility.

Serology for syphilis or HIV — for example if suggested by the history and examination.

Electrocardiography (ECG) — for example if a cardiovascular problem is suspected.

Brain imaging — requires referral, and will routinely be done for people referred for diagnosis and subtyping of dementia.

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are from the Dementia guideline published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

The recommendations about investigations were based on observational studies.

Discussing the possibility of dementia

How should I discuss the possibility of dementia?

Clearly and sensitively communicate the possibility of dementia, and preferably include the person's family or carer in the discussions.

Healthcare professionals are sometimes reluctant to raise the possibility of dementia, because they fear that the information might cause distress, anxiety, depression, catastrophic thinking, denial, or withdrawal from contact with services. However, clearly communicating the possibility of dementia helps people accept the diagnosis and manage their problems. The approach to communicating the diagnosis should be adapted to the person's needs.

Ideally, the diagnosis needs to be shared (with the person's permission) with carers and family.

Conveying the information about the diagnosis and its implications usually requires several consultations.

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations reflect the Dementia guideline published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

NICE found evidence from individual qualitative studies and systematic reviews that:

Most people with mild dementia wish to know their diagnosis.

Some people with dementia and their families find the withholding of information or the provision of vague information to be confusing, upsetting, or difficult.

Some people are distressed when the diagnosis is disclosed insensitively, or little information is provided, or follow up is inadequate.

Some clinicians carefully discuss with people with suspected dementia and their families what they wish to be told, and how the information should be given.

Some clinicians find it difficult to share the diagnosis of dementia with the individual and may benefit from support.

Assessing functional capacity

How should I assess functional capacity in someone with dementia?

People with suspected dementia should normally be referred to a specialist service for confirmation of the diagnosis, ascertainment of the likely cause, assessment, and drawing up a care plan.

Full assessment of functional capacity usually requires other disciplines (such as neuropsychiatry, occupational therapy, and physiotherapy).

Assessment of functional capacity should aim at identifying any unmet needs of the person and their carers, and include:

What are considered to be the main problems.

Remaining skills and capacities.

Support available.

Social contacts.

Self-care, personal hygiene, and ability to take medication as prescribed.

Dressing.

Safety when driving.

Safety in the home.

Degree of orientation in the home.

Ability to maintain the home, and to cook and shop.

Ability to look after financial affairs.

Continence.

Nutritional status.

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are from the Dementia guideline published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

Assessing driving safety

How should I assess driving safety in someone with dementia?

People who have been diagnosed with dementia may be able to safely continue driving for some time. The person is legally required to inform the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) when dementia is diagnosed.

When the time comes, many people find it difficult to accept that they can no longer drive.

The DVLA states that for:

Group 1 entitlement — ordinary driving licence (car, motorcycle)

It is extremely difficult to assess driving ability in those with dementia. Those who have poor short-term memory, disorientation, or a lack of insight and judgement are almost certainly not fit to drive.

The variable presentation and rate of progression is acknowledged. Disorders of attention will also cause impairment. A decision regarding fitness to drive is usually based on medical reports.

In early dementia when sufficient skills are retained and progression is slow, a licence may be issued subject to annual review. A formal driving assessment may be necessary.

Group 2 entitlement — vocational licence (large goods vehicle or passenger carrying vehicle)

The licence will be refused or revoked.

The regulations in the DVLA's Current medical standards of fitness to drive can be checked online at www.dft.gov.uk.

Where there is uncertainty over the person's driving ability, a driving assessment can be undertaken at one of the DVLA assessment centres. A list of centres is available from the Alzheimer's Society (www.alzheimers.org.uk), which also has a factsheet on driving.

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations reflect the medical standards of fitness to drive published by the DVLA [DVLA, 2010], and are in line with the Dementia guideline published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

Information

What information is available for people with dementia and their carers?

People with dementia and their carers should be offered printed information about:

The signs and symptoms of dementia.

The course and prognosis of the condition.

Treatments.

Local care and support services.

Support groups.

Sources of financial and legal advice, and advocacy.

Medico-legal issues, including driving.

Local information sources, including libraries and voluntary organizations.

Sources of support, information, and leaflets that can be printed include:

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Information for the public leaflet — available online at http://guidance.nice.org.uk.

NHS Choices article on Dementia, with links to other useful resources — available online at www.nhs.uk/conditions/dementia.

Alzheimer's Society, which provides information on all types of dementia: telephone helpline 0845 300 0336 (open 8.30 am to 6.30 pm weekdays), online at www.alzheimers.org.uk, and a specialist library www.alzheimers.org.uk/dementiacatalogue.

The Lewy Body Society www.lewybody.org.

The Pick's Disease Support Group www.pdsg.org.uk.

Carers UK provides help for anyone caring for a sick, disabled, or elderly person at home: telephone 0808 808 7777, online at www.carersuk.org.

Princess Royal Trust for Carers provides help for anyone caring for a sick, disabled, or elderly person at home: telephone 0844 800 4361, online at www.carers.org.

The Office of the Public Guardian supports decision making, within the framework of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, for people who lack capacity or would like to plan for their future: online at www.publicguardian.gov.uk.

Management

Management

Scenario: Ongoing management: covers the approach to primary care management of dementia, and the management of cognitive problems, anxiety and depression, and other psychological and behavioural problems.

Scenario: Managing end-of-life problems: briefly covers the principles of palliative care, and reviews the management of some common problems in palliative care.

Scenario: Supporting carers: covers how to recognize when carers need support, and how they can be supported.

Scenario: Ongoing management

Scenario: Ongoing management

360months3060monthsBoth

Approach to ongoing management

What is the approach to ongoing management of dementia in primary care?

Ensure that primary care is coordinated with secondary care and social care.

Provide the person with dementia and their carers with information and advice about dementia, its management, and what local support is available.

Ensure people with dementia have the opportunity to give informed consent to decisions about their care and treatment.

Follow the principles of the Mental Capacity Act, which include: assuming that adults have capacity until proven otherwise despite all available support; assessing capacity for each decision; and acting in the person's best interests.

Recognize and support carers' needs, which they may be reluctant to express. Carers are at risk for depressed mood, feeling excessively burdened by their responsibilities, and worse general health. Local authorities provide community care assessments and carers assessments; primary healthcare staff can help expedite these assessments.

Have a structured follow up and review process for people with dementia.

Promote strategies to cope with disabilities so the person can be as independent as possible.

Prevent and manage challenging behaviour as far as possible with non-drug psychosocial approaches (where expertise and services are available) such as reality orientation, memory enhancement, and reframing thinking about problems to thinking about solutions.

Challenging behaviour includes a range of symptoms, such as apathy, depression, wandering, pacing about, agitation, aggression, incontinence, altered eating habits, disinhibition, and psychosis (delusions and hallucinations).

A variety of other terms have been used as synonyms for challenging behaviour, including 'behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia', and 'neuropsychiatric symptoms'.

Non-drug management is preferred over drug treatments, except for the immediate management of people who are severely agitated or pose an immediate risk of harm to themselves or others.

Drug treatment for cognitive symptoms of dementia is initiated by a specialist, but may be continued and monitored by a general practitioner under a shared care protocol.

Be alert for, and manage, anxiety and depression.

Coping strategies

Coping strategies

Strategies to cope with disabilities due to dementia and promote independence include:

Modifying the physical environment, including: aids such as grab bars and handrails; labelling, rearranging, or removing objects; and placing clothing or other frequently needed items where they can be easily found without having to remember where they are kept.

Simplifying the tasks of daily living, for example by using short verbal or written instructions, planning and writing out a daily routine, and assistive technologies.

Providing a supportive social environment, including helping carers involve their social network in caring responsibilities, and helping them communicate with healthcare and social care professionals.

Occupational therapists can provide specialist assessment and management strategies.

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations reflect the Dementia guideline published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

The examples of coping strategies were taken from an article discussing the Environmental Skill-Building Program [Gitlin et al, 2003].

Managing symptoms - drug therapy

What are the principles of the pharmacotherapy for cognitive symptoms in dementia?

Drug treatment for the cognitive symptoms of dementia is always initiated by a specialist (such as a psychiatrist, neurologist, or physician specializing in the care of the elderly) but may be continued and monitored by the general practitioner under a shared care protocol.

People with dementia should be given the opportunity to make informed decisions about their care and treatment. Lack of capacity to make an informed decision should not be assumed, but be assessed for each decision.

Dementia caused by Alzheimer's disease

Donepezil, galantamine, or rivastigmine are recommended for people with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease.

Memantine is recommended for managing people with:

Moderate Alzheimer’s disease who cannot take either, donepezil, galantamine, or rivastigmine.

Severe Alzheimer’s disease.

Shared care protocols for acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and memantine vary from area to area. However, in general, once treatment has been initiated (by a specialist):

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor:

The dose is titrated up (by the specialist) over 4–12 weeks (depending on which drug is used) to a usual maintenance dose. For more information, see Dose and titration.

Memantine:

Initial dose is 5 mg once a day, increased (by the specialist) by steps of 5 mg at weekly intervals until the maintenance dose is reached. For more information, see Dose and titration.

The person is monitored by the specialist for treatment response and tolerability.

The person is stabilized on drug treatment.

Once the person has been stabilized, the general practitioner may be requested to:

Prescribe medication at monthly intervals.

Monitor compliance.

Liaise with the specialist regarding any adverse effects.

Contact the specialist team or consultant if any of the following occur:

Sudden deterioration in cognitive function.

Intolerance or adverse effects of medication.

Non-compliance.

Signs or symptoms of toxicity (for example anxiety, restlessness, insomnia, tiredness, dizziness, headache, nausea, vomiting, abdominal colic, diarrhoea, sweating, and hypersalivation).

Initiation of potentially interacting medication.

When the person has been stabilized on an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor or memantine they should be assessed regularly by a specialist team, or under shared care arrangements. This assessment should include a MMSE score and cognitive, global, functional, and behavioural assessment.

Treatment may be discontinued when it is considered to be no longer worthwhile, and the MMSE score decreases to less than 10 points.

Dementia not caused by Alzheimer's disease

Rivastigmine is licensed for the symptomatic treatment of mild-to-moderately severe dementia in people with idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

For other causes of dementia, there are no specific drug treatments for cognitive symptoms (although some options may be available as part of a controlled clinical trial).

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are from the Dementia guideline, and health technology appraisal Donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007; NICE, 2011a].

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors

Evidence from a systematic review performed by NICE found that, compared with placebo, the acetylcholinesterase inhibitors provide small but consistent gains in scores on cognitive and global scales for people with mild-to-moderately severe Alzheimer's disease [NICE, 2009]. NICE have reviewed the evidence published subsequent to this and concluded that acetylcholinesterase inhibitors continue to show small but definite clinical benefits for people with mild and moderate Alzheimer’s disease when compared with best supportive care for cognitive, functional, and global outcomes. The committee concluded that the nature and extent of behavioural benefits were uncertain as the results from the available evidence were mixed [NICE, 2011a].

Memantine

A systematic review performed by NICE found that, overall, the evidence was currently insufficient to determine the clinical effectiveness of memantine in either the whole population of moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease or the subgroup of people with behavioural symptoms [NICE, 2009].

NICE have updated this review and have identified one new randomized controlled trial that assessed the effectiveness of memantine compared with placebo. NICE concluded that there was no new evidence of a statistically significant benefit compared with placebo for any outcome [NICE, 2011a]. However, when the data from this trial was pooled with the previously evaluated studies, memantine showed improvement in cognition at 12 weeks and in function at 24 to 28 weeks.

NICE reviewed the available evidence and considered that memantine would not be cost effective compared with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in people with moderate disease and concluded that memantine should only be recommended to people with moderate dementia if they were intolerant of, or had contraindications to, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors [NICE, 2011a].

NICE considered the manufacturer's submission that included a subgroup analysis of people who had aggression and agitation, with or without psychotic symptoms and noted that these are more common in people with severe Alzheimer's disease. Having heard from clinical specialists and the manufacturer that memantine appears to have cognitive, behavioural, functional and global effects in this group of people NICE accepted that memantine may offer benefit to people with severe Alzheimer's disease [NICE, 2011a].

For a more detailed review of the evidence regarding drug treatments for dementia, see the full NICE guideline (pdf).

Follow up and review

How should I follow up and review someone with dementia?

As part of their care plan, people with dementia should be systematically followed up and reviewed to assess how their needs, and those of their carers, have changed.

People being treated with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor will have their follow up structured according to the requirements of their drug. People who are not being treated with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor can have their follow up structured similarly, although shared care arrangements might be different.

In routine follow up:

Ensure that care continues to be coordinated with secondary care and local authority adult social services.

Assess for, and address, problems with:

Disability arising from cognitive symptoms, behavioural problems, and comorbidity (such as depression and anxiety).

Functional capacity and physical needs (such as nutrition, swallowing, hearing, eyesight, mobility, and continence).

Adverse effects of any drugs. See Prescribing information for information on the adverse effects of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, risperidone, lorazepam, and haloperidol.

Comorbidities.

Carer stress and comorbidity (such as depression).

For people in a care home, check for environmental and psychosocial risk factors (such as overcrowding, lack of privacy, lack of activities, inadequate staff attention, and poor communication between the person with dementia and staff).

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are from the Dementia guideline published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

Non-drug supportive measures

How should I provide support to people with dementia and their carers?

People with a new diagnosis of dementia are commonly concerned about other people finding out their diagnosis, that others want to 'take over' all decisions, that their abilities will rapidly deteriorate, or that their disabilities could be embarrassing. These concerns can be addressed using the techniques of reality orientation, memory strategies, and reframing thinking about problems as thinking about solutions. Providing early effective psychological support helps to develop a trusting relationship with the person and their family or carer while cognition and insight remain relatively intact.

Reality orientation and structured group cognitive stimulation

Focus on the likely slow progression of early dementia.

Emphasize that much can be done to minimize disabilities and maximize abilities.

Explain that minor memory lapses are common, can be accommodated with memory enhancement strategies, and minor memory lapses do not mean that the person will soon be incapacitated, institutionalized, bed-bound, and incontinent.

If available, give people with mild-to-moderate dementia (of any type) the opportunity to participate in a structured group cognitive stimulation programme (which includes reality orientation).

Memory enhancement

Explain strategies to manage memory problems, for example:

Not being embarrassed to ask for help when the person does not remember or does not understand.

Making notes about common tasks (such as locking the door at night, when to put the rubbish out for collection).

Putting reminders on the phone, drawers, and cupboards.

Keeping keys and spectacles in obvious places.

Reframing

Encourage people with dementia (and their carers and family) to think more positively.

Explain how they can reframe thinking negatively about problems to thinking positively about solutions. For example:

From the negative 'dementia is a terminal condition', to the positive 'dementia is a disability that can be accommodated'.

From the negative 'dementia is being stupid', to the positive 'dementia is having difficulties that can be addressed'.

From the negative 'things that can no longer be done', to the positive 'things that still can be done'.

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations reflect the Dementia guideline published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

NICE recommends providing a structured group cognitive stimulation programme for all people with mild or moderate dementia of any type.

Cognitive stimulation entails exposure to, and engagement with, activities and materials involving some degree of cognitive processing, usually within a social context, with the emphasis on enjoyment of activities.

Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in people with Alzheimer's disease found that adding cognitive stimulation to treatment with donepezil was effective in terms of preventing cognitive decline measured with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog).

One RCT [Spector et al, 2003], and an economic study [Knapp et al, 2006], compared cognitive stimulation therapy given over 8 weeks to standard care for people with mild-to-moderate dementia. The primary outcome was MMSE score, and a secondary outcome was Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) score. There was a statistically significant improvement in both MMSE and QoL-AD scores for people offered cognitive stimulation therapy compared with people in the usual care group. Cognitive stimulation therapy was more cost-effective (for both outcome measures) than treatment as usual.

The recommendations about advising memory enhancement and reframing are made on the basis of expert opinion [Iliffe et al, 2009a]. CKS found no relevant clinical trials.

Information

What information is available for people with dementia and their carers?

People with dementia and their carers should be offered printed information about:

The signs and symptoms of dementia.

The course and prognosis of the condition.

Treatments.

Local care and support services.

Support groups.

Sources of financial and legal advice, and advocacy.

Medico-legal issues, including driving.

Local information sources, including libraries and voluntary organizations.

Sources of support, information, and leaflets that can be printed include:

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Information for the public leaflet — available online at http://guidance.nice.org.uk.

NHS Choices article on Dementia, with links to other useful resources — available online at www.nhs.uk/conditions/dementia.

Alzheimer's Society, which provides information on all types of dementia: telephone helpline 0845 300 0336 (open 8.30 am to 6.30 pm weekdays), online at www.alzheimers.org.uk, and a specialist library www.alzheimers.org.uk/dementiacatalogue.

The Lewy Body Society www.lewybody.org.

The Pick's Disease Support Group www.pdsg.org.uk.

Carers UK provides help for anyone caring for a sick, disabled, or elderly person at home: telephone 0808 808 7777, online at www.carersuk.org.

Princess Royal Trust for Carers provides help for anyone caring for a sick, disabled, or elderly person at home: telephone 0844 800 4361, online at www.carers.org.

The Office of the Public Guardian supports decision making, within the framework of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, for people who lack capacity or would like to plan for their future: online at www.publicguardian.gov.uk.

Managing anxiety and depression

How should I manage someone with dementia who has anxiety and/or depression?

People with dementia should be given the opportunity to make informed decisions about their care and treatment. Lack of capacity to make an informed decision should not be assumed, but be assessed for each decision.

For people with dementia who have depression or anxiety:

Consider arranging cognitive behavioural therapy (if available), and including the person's carers in the therapy.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommends additionally considering the following approaches, if they are available and can be tailored to the person:

Reminiscence therapy.

Multi-sensory stimulation.

Animal-assisted therapy.

Exercise.

For people with dementia who also have depression:

Offer treatment with an antidepressant.

Avoid antidepressant drugs with anticholinergic effects (tricyclic antidepressants and related drugs) because they may adversely affect cognition.

Explain the expected onset of action, emphasize the importance of adherence, and warn about the consequences of stopping treatment without seeking advice.

For more information, see the CKS topic on Depression.

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are from the Dementia guideline published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

Managing challenging behaviour

How should I manage challenging behaviour in someone with dementia?

If the person develops distressing non-cognitive symptoms or challenging behaviour, they should be assessed for factors that may generate, aggravate, or improve such behaviour. This assessment may require referral.

Challenging non-cognitive symptoms — include hallucinations, delusions, anxiety, and marked agitation.

Challenging behaviour — includes aggression, agitation, wandering, hoarding, sexual disinhibition, apathy, and disruptive vocal activity (such as shouting).

Non-drug management is preferred over drug treatments, except for the immediate management of people who are severely agitated or pose an immediate risk of harm to themselves or others.

People with dementia should be given the opportunity to make informed decisions about their care and treatment. Lack of capacity to make an informed decision should not be assumed, but be assessed for each decision.

Assessment for modifiable causes

How should I clinically assess someone with challenging behaviour or distressing non-cognitive symptoms?

If the person develops distressing non-cognitive symptoms or challenging behaviour, they should be assessed for factors that may generate, aggravate, or improve such behaviour:

Poor physical health.

Depression.

Undetected pain or discomfort.

Adverse effects of medication (including acetylcholinesterase inhibitors).

Religious beliefs and spiritual and cultural identity.

Psychosocial factors. Against whom is the aggression directed? Is there a reason?

Physical environmental factors.

Assessments of behaviour and functional analysis should be conducted by specifically trained healthcare professionals, in conjunction with carers and care workers.

Individually tailored care plans that help carers and staff address the behaviour should be developed, recorded in the notes, and reviewed regularly.

Non-drug approaches

Non-drug approaches for challenging behaviour in people with dementia

For agitation in people with dementia of any type, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) suggests considering the following non-drug approaches, provided they are suitable for the person (the availability may vary according to locality).

Aromatherapy.

Therapeutic use of music or dancing.

Animal-assisted therapy — allowing the person to interact with a trained pet dog or other animal.

Massage.

Multi-sensory stimulation — exposing the person to a combination of lighting effects, music or sounds, scents, tactile experiences, and balance challenges.

The response should be monitored and the approach changed as appropriate.

Volunteers with the necessary skills may provide these therapies.

For people in care homes, ensure that good quality care plans are in place and used by care home staff.

Drug treatments

Oral drug treatments for challenging non-cognitive symptoms in people with dementia

Try non-drug approaches before considering drug treatments.

Antipsychotics — if non-drug measures have not worked and the person is severely distressed (psychosis or agitated behaviour), or there is immediate risk to themselves or others, consider offering treatment with an antipsychotic such as risperidone (licensed for short-term treatment for up to 6 weeks).

Discuss the risks (increased risk of stroke, transient ischaemic attack, and changes in cognition) and benefits (small reduction in psychosis, aggression, and agitation) of treatment with the person and their carers.

Consider the risk of cerebrovascular events before starting an antipsychotic in people with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack, or in people with other risk factors for cerebrovascular disease (including hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and atrial fibrillation).

If the person has dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), obtain specialist advice before starting risperidone, as there is a risk of severe adverse effects (such as neuroleptic sensitivity reactions; development or worsening of extrapyramidal features; or acute, severe physical deterioration).

Obtain specialist advice as soon as possible, and certainly before continuing treatment with risperidone for longer than 6 weeks.

If treatment with risperidone is continued for longer than 6 weeks, regular monitoring is required:

Monitor every 3 months, for changes in the symptoms and for changes in cognition.

Monitor regularly for the adverse effects of risperidone.

Take into account comorbid conditions such as depression.

For prescribing information, see the section on Risperidone.

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, galantamine, or rivastigmine) may be offered as a treatment option by a specialist for:

People with dementia with Lewy bodies who have non-cognitive symptoms causing significant distress or leading to challenging behaviour.

People with any severity of Alzheimer's disease causing significant distress or challenging behaviour, if non-drug treatments or antipsychotic drugs are inappropriate or have been ineffective.

People with vascular dementia if they participate in a clinical trial.

Refer the person to a specialist if acetylcholinesterase inhibitors are being considered (they are always initiated in secondary care).

Extreme agitation or aggression

Immediate management of extreme agitation or aggression

If the person requires immediate management of violence, aggression, or extreme agitation because they pose a risk to themselves or others:

Move the person to a safe, low stimulation environment. In a care home setting, confirm that adequate staff are available to ensure ongoing safety.

Employ de-escalation techniques such as active listening, effective verbal responding, and redirection.

Assess and manage underlying causes for the person's agitation or aggression (such as pain, infection, adverse effects of drugs, and depression).

Use physical restraint only if necessary.

Consider using oral drug treatment for a short time (no more than 1 week) to calm the person and reduce agitation or aggression (not to sedate). Options, in order of preference, are a low dose of:

Oral lorazepam — 0.5 mg to 4 mg daily.

Oral haloperidol — 0.5 mg to 4 mg daily.

Avoid long-term use, high doses, and combinations of drugs.

Monitor the response to medication daily until the person is stable, as doses may need to be adjusted.

For more detailed prescribing information, see lorazepam and haloperidol.

If oral medication is refused, or is ineffective, or the aggression/agitation is extreme, obtain specialist advice urgently and before making arrangements for admission.

When the person is too agitated or aggressive to consent to the necessary use of sedating medication, its use is permitted by the Mental Health Act.

If involuntary sedation was used, at an early appropriate moment offer an opportunity to discuss it with the person and explain why it was used, and include carers in the discussion.

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are from the Dementia guideline, and health technology appraisal Donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine (review) and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (amended), published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007; NICE, 2009]. They also take account of recommendations made in a report, commissioned and funded by the Department of Health, on reducing the use of antipsychotic medication for people with dementia in the NHS in England [Banerjee, 2009; DH, 2009c].

Immediate management of extreme agitation or aggression

De-escalation techniques

De-escalation techniques are recommended on the basis of expert opinion [Harlow, 2009].

Oral haloperidol and lorazepam

The recommendation regarding haloperidol and lorazepam is based on published expert opinion [American Psychiatric Association, 2007; Burns and Iliffe, 2009a]. The lowest effective dose should be used for a limited amount of time because of the adverse effect profiles (for example dependence, sedation, and falls) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

Admission

If parenteral treatment is being considered, admission is recommended because the person needs to be monitored closely after administration. There is a possibility that respiratory arrest may occur if the person in given lorazepam parenterally [ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2009d].

Drug treatments for challenging non-cognitive symptoms in people with dementia

Antipsychotics

These recommendations are based on advice issued by NICE [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007] and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) [MHRA, 2009]. They also take account of recommendations made in a report, commissioned and funded by the Department of Health, on reducing the use of antipsychotic medication for people with dementia in the NHS in England [Banerjee, 2009; DH, 2009c].

NICE found moderate-to-high quality evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two systematic reviews that antipsychotics produce a small (statistically significant) reduction in neuropsychiatric symptoms (psychosis, aggression, and agitation) in people with Alzheimer's disease or vascular dementia. This benefit may be offset by the adverse effects: there is evidence that all antipsychotics are associated with an increased risk of stroke and mortality when used in elderly people with dementia and appear to be associated with accelerated cognitive decline in people with Alzheimer's disease. Antipsychotics should only be used for people with dementia when they are a risk to themselves or others, and where all other methods have been tried [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

The MHRA based their recommendations on three RCTs, which found that risperidone used short-term to treat aggression in Alzheimer's disease provided clear benefits [MHRA, 2009].

The Department of Health policy is that people with dementia should only be offered anti-psychotics if they are severely distressed or there is an immediate risk of harm to the person or others, and that general practitioners (GPs) should review the use of antipsychotics in people with dementia and follow best practice in terms of initiation, dose minimization, and cessation of treatment [Banerjee, 2009; DH, 2009c].

Risperidone

CKS recommends risperidone because this is the only antipsychotic licensed to treat challenging behaviour in people with dementia, even though other antipsychotics have been used historically. Risperidone is licensed for the short-term treatment (up to 6 weeks) of persistent aggression in people with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's dementia unresponsive to non-pharmacological approaches and where there is a risk of harm to self or others [ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2008].

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors — NICE found evidence that in people with:

Alzheimer's disease: donepezil reduces non-cognitive behavioural symptoms. The results were inconclusive for galantamine, and no trials were identified that assessed rivastigmine for this indication.

Dementia with Lewy Bodies: rivastigmine may improve psychotic symptoms.

Vascular dementia: the results were inconclusive.

Scenario: Managing end-of-life problems

Scenario: Managing end-of-life problems (palliative care)

360months3060monthsBoth

Principles of palliative care

What are the principles of palliative care and end-of-life issues for people with dementia?

Advice should be sought, either from a GP with a special interest or from the local palliative care team, if the primary healthcare professional is not experienced in palliative care.

Planning ahead in the earlier stages of dementia

While the person still has mental capacity, ensure that they and their carers have discussed how they should plan ahead. Advise the person to consider making, before they lose capacity:

Advance statements of wishes and feelings they would like to be taken into account in future decisions about their care and affairs.

Advance decisions in which they state what treatments they do not want to have and would not consent to.

Lasting power of attorney in which they state who they want to make decisions for them if they cannot make decisions for themselves.

Preferred place of care plan in which they record their decisions about future care choices, for example where they would like to die.

A will.

Optimizing palliative care in the later stages of dementia

In the last 6 months of life, people with dementia are thought to experience symptoms (including pain) that last for longer and are less likely to be treated, compared with people dying of other conditions. It is therefore important to ensure that palliative care needs are met in accordance with the Department of Health's End of life strategy, which includes use of appropriate tools and pathways (including Preferred priorities for care, Gold standards framework, and the Liverpool care pathway).

Assess the person's needs, make them feel comfortable, and enable them to die with dignity and in a place of their choosing.

Any decisions about care and treatment (including resuscitation) should take account of the person's wishes and any advance decisions they have made.

Assess the carer's needs and support them during their bereavement.

Coordinating care services

People with dementia may require coordination of a diverse range of services to enable them to continue living at home and to die there if that is their wish. These services include primary care, community nursing, domiciliary care, social care, community pharmacy, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, dietetics, out-of-hours services, and hospice.

Taking values into account

People involved in decisions about the care and treatment of people with dementia can have different values. When negotiating decisions, follow the principles of values-based medicine, which include:

All decisions depend on values as well as facts.

Shared values can be ignored, but diversity of values may be increasingly common.

Diversity of values may remain unnoticed if they are presumed to be shared. Values therefore need to be specifically elicited.

Conflicts of values are resolved primarily, not by reference to a rule prescribing a 'right' outcome, but by processes that support a balance of the different perspectives, each of which may be legitimate.

Additional information

Additional information

The Liverpool care pathway for the dying patient provides a national framework for caring for people in the terminal phase of a disease. It aims to improve professional communication and documentation and to integrate national guidelines into clinical practice (see www.liv.ac.uk).

The Gold standards framework provides multiple tools, tasks, and resources, which can be adapted within GP practices and community nursing teams, to improve end-of-life care for people with any end-stage illness.

Preferred priorities for care is a patient-held document designed to help people make choices in relation to end-of-life issues.

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are from the Dementia guideline published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007], and are in line with NICE guidelines on palliative care in cancer [NICE, 2004].

There is little good evidence on how best to provide palliative care for people with dementia. Questions such as when support from the NHS is most needed, what form it should take, and how care home staff and NHS professionals working in primary care can work more effectively together are being addressed in a UK research project, EVIDEM–EOL.

NICE recommends following the principles of values-based medicine; these are summarized by [Petrova et al, 2006] and in the GP curriculum statement [RCGP, 2007d].

Managing common end-of-life problems

How should I manage the common palliative care problems in people with dementia?

Eating and drinking

Encourage the person to eat and drink by mouth for as long as possible.

Refer for specialist assessment or seek advice if feeding or swallowing is a concern. Specialist dietary advice may be helpful.

Feeding by tube is not usually recommended, but it may be considered if dysphagia is thought to be transient.

Distress or changes in behaviour

Assess the person for an underlying cause (which is often pain), and manage as appropriate.

Pain

Simple measures such as a heat pad, massage, and relaxation should be considered before drug treatments.

The CKS topic on Palliative cancer care - pain has detailed information on assessing pain and managing the different types and sources of pain (such as muscle spasm; neuropathic, bone, and intracranial pain; and colic).

Fever

Assess the person for an underlying cause.

Prescribe an antipyretic (such as paracetamol) and use mechanical means of cooling the person (for example cool compresses). This may be all that is required.

Constipation, nausea, and loss of appetite

If opiates are the cause of nausea, constipation, or loss of appetite, review the need to continue with them.

Manage constipation with dietary changes and laxatives.

For more details and prescribing information, see the CKS topics on Palliative cancer care - constipation and Palliative cancer care - nausea & vomiting.

Insomnia

Insomnia can be managed with short-courses of sedatives and hypnotics. Elderly people with dementia may be more susceptible to their averse effects. For more details and prescribing information, see the CKS topic on Insomnia.

Anxiety and Depression

See Managing anxiety and depression for more information.

Withdrawing treatment

When considering withholding or withdrawing life-prolonging treatment, follow the General Medical Council's standards of practice which explains the ethical and legal principles doctors are expected to be guided by [General Medical Council, 2009].

Resuscitation — planning ahead

Consult the person's advance decision document to ascertain their wishes regarding resuscitation.

If the person has not documented an advance decision to refuse resuscitation, decisions about resuscitation should:

Take account of any expressed wishes or beliefs of the person with dementia, the views of the carers, and the multidisciplinary team.

Be made in accordance with the Resuscitation Council guidance and the person's mental capacity.

Record decisions about resuscitation in the medical notes and care plans.

Advice should be sought, either from a GP with a special interest or from the local palliative care team, if the healthcare professional is not experienced in palliative care.

The CKS topic on Palliative cancer care - general issues is largely applicable to palliative care in dementia, and includes information on assessing and managing physical, psychological, social, and religious needs, as well as assessing the needs of carers and family.

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are in line with guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [NICE, 2004; National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007] and policies published by the Department of Health [DH, 2008a; End of Life Care Programme, 2008].

The recommendations are supported by a survey of carers which found that the most common symptoms in the last year of life in people with dementia were confusion (83%), urinary incontinence (72%), pain (64%), low mood (61%), constipation (59%), and loss of appetite (57%) [McCarthy et al, 1997].

Scenario: Supporting carers

Scenario: Supporting carers of people with dementia

360months3060monthsBoth

Supporting carers

How can I support the carers of people with dementia?

Assess the carer's needs — this includes while the person with dementia is being looked after at home and after they have entered residential care.

The assessment should identify any psychological distress and the psychosocial impact on the carer. Carers are often stressed and depressed, and this may be the reason for an avoidable admission of the person with dementia. Carer's may be reluctant to ask for professional help.

Ensure there is a care plan in place for the carer.

Ensure the carer has access to:

Individual or group psychoeducation.

Peer-support groups tailored to the needs of the individual (for example, the stage of dementia of the person being cared for).

Telephone and internet information and support. For more information, see Resources to support carers.

Training courses about dementia, services and benefits, and dementia-care problem solving.

If the carer is experiencing psychological distress or there is a negative psychological impact — offer psychological therapy (including cognitive behavioural therapy).

Ensure the carer has access to respite services or short break services which are local, flexible, and timely. The types of services offered should ideally include:

Day care.

Day and night-sitting.

Adult placement.

Short-term or overnight residential care.

Transport to services should be offered to support access to the interventions that are being offered.

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are from the Dementia guideline published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007], and are in line with Department of Health policy on carers [DH, 2007; DH, 2008b].

Assessing the carer's needs

How should I assess the needs of the carer?

When assessing the needs of the carer, ask about:

How they see the situation, and how they get on with the person they are caring for.

What support they get from family, friends, and neighbours.

What their emotional, mental, and physical health is.

What tasks they have to do. Which tasks they would like help with. What they find particularly stressful.

How burdensome they find caring: overall, physically, financially, emotionally, and socially.

How well they understand the cared-for person's illness and disabilities, and the likely development of the condition.

What other responsibilities they have, such as work, education, and family and child care commitments.

What options are available to the carer, particularly if they are employed, and their strengths and ways of coping.

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are in line with the Dementia guideline published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

The issues to assess are those suggested by the Alzheimer's Society published in an interactive CD Dementia tutorial: diagnosis and management in primary care [Alzheimer's Society, 2008]. The CD is endorsed by the Department of Health and the National Dementia Strategy Implementation Plan.

Resources to support carers

Where can carers of people with dementia get support?

The local authority adult social services can play an important signposting role.

Alzheimer's Society (www.alzheimers.org.uk)

Gordon House, 10 Greencoat Place, London, SW1P 1PH. Telephone 0845 300 0336.

Information and support for people with Alzheimer's disease and other types of dementia.

Carers UK (www.carersuk.org)

20–25 Glasshouse Yard, London, EC1A 4JS. Telephone 0808 808 7777.

Princess Royal Trust for Carers (www.carers.org)

14 Bourne Court, Southend Road, Woodford Green, Essex, I68 8HD. Telephone 0844 800 4361.

Dementia Support Group (www.allcommunity.co.uk)

Thicketford Road, Bolton, BL2 2LW. Telephone 01204 337537.

The Pick's Disease Support Group (www.pdsg.org.uk)

Basis for recommendation

Basis for recommendation

This information is in line with the Dementia guideline published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC) (http://medicines.org.uk/emc), or the British National Formulary (BNF) (www.bnf.org).

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors

Treatment with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors is always initiated in secondary care by a specialist. However, treatment may be continued and monitored by a general practitioner under a shared care protocol [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

Available drugs to treat dementia

What drugs are available in the UK to treat Alzheimer's disease?

Four drugs are licensed in the UK to treat Alzheimer's disease — donepezil (Aricept®), rivastigmine (Exelon®), galantamine (Reminyl®), and memantine (Ebixa®). Rivastigmine is also licensed for dementia in Parkinson's Disease.

Donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine are acetylcholinesterase inhibitors; they are licensed to treat mild-to-moderate dementia in Alzheimer's disease. They are the only drug treatments recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).

They inhibit cholinesterase from breaking down acetylcholine, thus increasing the level and duration of action of acetylcholine in the brain. Decline in cognition is thought to be associated with a decline in cholinergic neurons and decreasing levels of acetylcholine in the brain [Taylor et al, 2009].

Although donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine have slightly different pharmacological actions, these differences have not been shown to result in differences in efficacy or tolerability [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

Donepezil selectively inhibits acetylcholinesterase.

Rivastigmine affects acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase.

Galantamine selectively inhibits acetylcholinesterase and also affects nicotinic receptors.

The three drugs are available as oral preparations. Donepezil is also available as an orodispersible preparation, and rivastigmine is also available as a patch.

Memantine is also licensed for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease. However, NICE does not recommend it except as part of a clinical study [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

Memantine is thought to work by acting as a neuroprotective agent, by acting as an antagonist at N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors.

Contraindications

Who should not receive acetylcholinesterase inhibitors?

Galantamine is contraindicated in people with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance less than 9 mL/min or chronic kidney disease stage 5 [estimated glomerular filtration rate < 15 mL/minute/1.73m2]) or severe hepatic impairment (Child–Pugh score greater than 9) [ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2009c].

Dose and titration

What dose of acetylcholinesterase inhibitor is normally prescribed, and how is the dose titrated?

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors are aways initiated in secondary care by a specialist. However treatment may be continued and monitored by a general practitioner under a shared care protocol [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

Donepezil

The usual starting dose is 5 mg once a day. This is usually maintained for at least 1 month [ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2009a; Taylor et al, 2009].

The dose is usually increased to 10 mg each day (usual treatment dose) if the person has tolerated the starting dose [ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2009a; Taylor et al, 2009].

Galantamine

The usual starting dose is 8 mg twice a day (8 mg XL daily). The dose is normally titrated upwards every 4 weeks if the person is able to tolerate the increase in dose. The dose is increased by 8 mg twice a day until a usual treatment dose of 24 mg XL daily.

Rivastigmine (oral)

The usual starting dose is 1.5 mg twice a day for 2 weeks. If this has been well tolerated, the dose is titrated every 2 weeks until a target treatment dose of 6 mg twice a day has been reached [ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2009b; Taylor et al, 2009].

Rivastigmine (patch)

The usual starting dose is to apply one 4.6 mg/24 hours patch daily. If this is well tolerated, the dose is titrated up after 4 weeks to 9.5 mg/24 hours patch daily.

If switching the person from oral to transdermal therapy:

For people taking 3 mg to 6 mg orally each day — prescribe a 4.6 mg/24 hours patch.

If the person is taking 9 mg orally each day and is not tolerating the dose well — prescribed a 4.6 mg/24 hours patch.

If the person is taking 9 mg orally each day and is tolerating this dose well — prescribe a 9.5 mg/24 hours patch.

If the person is taking 12 mg daily — prescribe a 9.5 mg/24 hours patch.

When converting from oral to transdermal therapy, the first patch should be applied on the day following the last oral dose.

Adverse effects

What adverse effects occur with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors?

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors are generally well tolerated [Birks, 2006; Burns and Iliffe, 2009b], common adverse effects include diarrhoea, muscle cramps, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, insomnia, and headache. These are caused by cholinergic stimulation. A titration period of about 3 months is needed to develop tolerance and to minimize these adverse effects [Birks, 2006].

Less common adverse effects include symptoms of the common cold, anorexia, psychiatric disorders, syncope and seizures, dizziness, rash, pruritus, fatigue, pain, and urinary incontinence [BNF 58, 2009; Taylor et al, 2009].

Bronchospasm has been associated with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. If used in people with a history of asthma or obstructive pulmonary disease, they should be advised to report any deterioration in breathing.

Bradycardia has been reported rarely in people taking acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. People with sick sinus syndrome or cardiac conduction conditions, such as sinoatrial or atrioventricular block, should not be given acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.

If acetylcholinesterase inhibitors must be used, review the person regularly to exclude symptomatic bradycardia.

Electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring is not necessary [Taylor et al, 2009].

Increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding — monitor people with a history of ulcers and those taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2009a].

Ability to drive

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors can cause fatigue, dizziness, and muscle cramps, mainly when initiating or increasing the dose. The person's ability to drive should be assessed routinely [ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2009a].

Dementia itself may cause impairment of driving performance or compromise the ability to use machinery.

For more information, see Assessing driving safety.

Drug interactions

What key drug interactions of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors should I be aware of?

CKS recommends that people requiring a change in the dose of acetylcholinesterase inhibitor should be referred to specialist mental health services, or that advice should be sought.

Donepezil

Azole antifungals (ketoconazole and itraconazole) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (paroxetine and fluoxetine) increase serum levels of donepezil and may increase adverse effects.

If adverse effects develop or worsen, consider reducing the dose of donepezil or both drugs.

Rifampicin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbitone, and dexamethasone decrease the plasma levels of donepezil. Use these drugs only if no alternative is available. If there is no suitable alternative, try to use the lowest possible dose. Regular alcohol intake also reduces plasma levels of donepezil.

Rivastigmine does not undergo hepatic metabolism and appears to be least likely to cause problematic drug interactions [ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2009b; Taylor et al, 2009].

Galantamine

Ketoconazole, erythromycin, ritonavir, quinidine, paroxetine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, and amitriptyline all increase the plasma level of galantamine and may increase adverse effects [Taylor et al, 2009].

If adverse effects develop or worsen, consider reducing the dose of galantamine [Baxter, 2008].

Monitoring

How should I monitor someone taking acetylcholinesterase inhibitors?

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors are aways initiated in secondary care by a specialist. However treatment may be continued and monitored by a general practitioner under a shared care protocol [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

Shared care protocols vary from area to area. However, in general, after an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor has been initiated (in secondary care):

The dose is titrated up over 4–12 weeks (depending on which drug is used) to a usual maintenance dose.

For more information, see Dose and titration.

The person is monitored by the specialist for treatment response and tolerability.

The person is stabilized on drug treatment.

Once the person has been stabilized, the general practitioner may be requested to:

Prescribe medication at monthly intervals.

Monitor compliance.

Liaise with the specialist regarding any adverse effects.

Contact the specialist team or consultant if any of the following occur:

Sudden deterioration in cognitive function.

Intolerance or adverse effects to medication.

Non-compliance.

Signs or symptoms of toxicity (for example anxiety, restlessness, insomnia, tiredness, dizziness, headache, nausea, vomiting, abdominal colic, diarrhoea, sweating, and hypersalivation).

Initiation of potentially interacting medication.

Risperidone

Risperidone

People with dementia who develop challenging behaviour (such as psychosis, aggression, or agitation) should only be offered treatment with an antipsychotic if they are severely distressed or there is immediate risk to themselves or others [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

CKS recommends risperidone because this is the only antipsychotic licensed to treat challenging behaviour in people with dementia, even though other antipsychotics have been used historically.

Risperidone is indicated for the short-term treatment (up to 6 weeks) of persistent aggression in people with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's dementia unresponsive to non-pharmacological approaches and where there is a risk of harm to self or others [ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2008].

Contraindications

Who should not receive risperidone?

Do not prescribe risperidone for people with mild-to-moderate non-cognitive symptoms and:

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) — because there is an increased risk of severe adverse effects (such as development or worsening of extrapyramidal features or acute severe physical deterioration) [NICE, 2006].

Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, or mixed dementia — because the increased risk of stroke and death outweighs the benefit of treatment [NICE, 2006].

Dose and titration

What dose of risperidone is normally prescribed, and how is the dose titrated

Give a starting dose of 0.25 mg twice a day. Titrate the dose up, by 0.25 mg twice a day every other day, to a maximum of 1 mg twice a day. The usual maintenance dose is 0.5 mg twice a day.

[ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2008]

Adverse effects

What adverse effects occur with risperidone?

Increased risk of stroke and death

All antipsychotics, including risperidone, are associated with an increased risk of stroke and death when used in elderly people with dementia [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

In clinical trials, concomitant use of risperidone and furosemide was associated with a higher incidence of death (7.3%) compared with risperidone alone (3.1%). No pathological mechanism has been identified to explain these findings.

One large study estimates that treatment with risperidone was responsible for two extra strokes per 1000 person-years of treatment [Herrmann et al, 2004]. This would suggest that risperidone would cause a stroke in two or three of each 10,000 people treated over the first 6 weeks.

Changes in cognition — the use of antipsychotic drugs seems to be associated with accelerated cognitive decline in people with Alzheimer's dementia [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS)

Dystonia and parkinsonism — can be alleviated by antimuscarinic drugs, such as procyclidine (these should not be prescribed routinely).

Akathisia — may be relieved by reducing the dose of risperidone. If this is ineffective, consider seeking specialist advice.

Tardive dyskinesia — the emergence of acute EPS is a strong risk factor for later tardive dyskinesia: consider stopping or reducing the dose of risperidone if tardive dyskinesia occurs.

Orthostatic hypotension — may occur particularly during the initial dose titration. The dose should be titrated gradually.

Weight gain — common with all antipsychotics. Calorie restriction or a low glycaemic diet may help to reduce weight gain.

Dyslipidaemia — risperidone increases lipid levels. Offer dietary advice and consider treatment with a statin according to national guidelines. For more information, see the CKS topic on Lipid modification - CVD prevention. If severe hyperlipidaemia develops, seek specialist advice.

Hyperprolactinaemia — risperidone has a potent prolactin-elevating effects. This may lead to galactorrhea, gynaecomastia, hypogonadism, and an increased risk of osteoporosis.

Sedation — tolerance to sedation usually develops.

Anticholinergic effects — such as dry mouth, blurred vision, urinary retention, constipation, and cutaneous flushing.

Postural hypotension — is commonly associated with risperidone.

Hypertension — hypertension can occur as:

A small, steady increase in blood pressure over time (may be associated with weight gain), or

An unpredictable, sharp increase in blood pressure on starting a new drug.

Reduced seizure threshold — seizures are a recognized adverse effect of all antipsychotics (the higher the dose, the greater the risk).

Impaired glucose tolerance — hyperglycaemia, and sometimes diabetes, can occur in people taking risperidone. Appropriate clinical monitoring is advisable for those with diabetes or risk factors for diabetes.

QT interval prolongation — this is the most widely reported cardiac conduction defect caused by antipsychotics and is considered to be a class effect. It increases the risk of torsades de pointes, a potentially fatal arrhythmia.

Avoid co-prescribing drugs that prolong the QT interval.

Hypokalaemia also increases the risk of Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias. Monitor potassium levels closely if the person is taking drugs known to lower potassium levels.

People taking antipsychotics who experience palpitations or any other symptoms that suggest cardiac disease should undergo electrocardiography.

Avoid antipsychotics (or consider dose reduction) if the QT interval is prolonged.

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome — a very rare (less than 1% of people) but life-threatening adverse effect that can occur with any antipsychotic.

Symptoms include hyperthermia, muscle rigidity, autonomic instability, and fluctuating consciousness.

Mortality without treatment is 20%; urgent medical treatment is therefore needed.

[ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2008; BNF 58, 2009; Taylor et al, 2009]

Drug interactions

What key drug interactions of risperidone should I be aware of?

Drugs with a sedative action (such as alcohol, analgesics, tricyclic antidepressants, and sedating antihistamines) will increase the sedative effects of risperidone.

Drugs with a hypotensive effect (for example antihypertensives) will increase the hypotensive effect of risperidone.

Drugs that prolong the QT interval, such as antiarrhythmics, macrolides (for example erythromycin), and tricyclic antidepressants may have a synergistic effect on the QT interval. Avoid co-prescribing drugs that prolong QT intervals.

Diuretics may cause hypokalaemia, which may increase the risk of arrhythmias; monitor potassium levels in people taking diuretics. For more information, see Drugs known to lower potassium levels.

Levodopa — risperidone may antagonize the effect of levodopa. Use the lowest effective dose of each treatment.

Benzodiazepines can be used with antipsychotics but be aware of potential adverse effects like additive sedative effects, hypotension, and respiratory depression.

Carbamazepine

Carbamazepine reduces plasma levels of risperidone by half; monitor the person's symptoms to ensure that the antipsychotic remains effective.

Carbamazepine levels are increased by risperidone; monitor the person for signs of carbamazepine toxicity (dysarthria, ataxia, nystagmus, drowsiness, and violent behaviour with tachycardia, dilated pupils, and hyperreflexia).

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) — risperidone levels are increased by fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, and paroxetine; the person should be monitored for adverse effects of risperidone and the dose of risperidone adjusted accordingly if these occur.

[ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2008; BNF 58, 2009; Taylor et al, 2009]

Drugs that prolong the QT interval.

Which drugs are known to prolong the QT interval?

Drugs known to have a high risk of causing QT prolongation include:

Antiarrhythmics (class Ia: disopyramide, procainamide, quinidine).

Antiarrhythmics (class III: amiodarone, sotalol).

Antihistamines (astemizole, terfenadine [if levels increased], and possibly mizolastine).

Antimalarials (artemether and other artemisinin derivatives, halofantrine).

Antipsychotics (amisulpride, haloperidol [high doses and intravenous use], sertindole).

Drugs known to be associated with some risk of causing QT prolongation include:

Clomipramine (the risk with other tricyclic antidepressants appears to be only in overdose).

Chlorpromazine.

Lithium (if levels are increased).

Macrolides.

Quinolones.

Quinine.

[Baxter, 2008]

Drugs known to lower potassium levels

Which drugs are known to reduce potassium levels?

Hypokalaemia increases the risk of Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias. Therefore, potassium levels should be closely monitored when drugs that can cause hypokalemia are used with drugs that prolong QT intervals.

Drugs known to reduce potassium levels (and can cause hypokalaemia) include:

Amphotericin B.

Corticosteroids.

Loop diuretics.

Salbutamol and related bronchodilators.

Stimulant laxatives.

Theophylline.

Thiazide diuretics.

[Baxter, 2008]

Monitoring

How should I monitor someone taking risperidone?

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence recommends that treatment with risperidone should be time-limited and that the person should be reviewed regularly (every 3 months or according to clinical need).

Baseline measurements for risperidone

Body weight — then monitor at 3 months, and yearly. If weight gain occurs, consider changing the antipsychotic and/or dietary or pharmacological intervention.

Serum electrolytes and urea — then monitor yearly. Any abnormalities should be investigated.

Full blood count — then monitor yearly, due to the risk of blood dyscrasias. Stop the drug if neutrophils decrease to below 1.5 x 109/L. Refer to the specialist if neutrophils decrease to below 0.5 x 109/L.

Plasma glucose — then monitor at 4–6 months, and yearly. If plasma glucose is increased, obtain a fasted sample (or a non-fasted sample and haemoglobin A1c); treat accordingly.

Blood pressure — and monitor frequently during dose titration. If severe hypertension (blood pressure greater than 180/110 mmHg) is observed, slow the rate of titration.

Electrocardiography — then monitor after dose changes and if there is evidence of other risk factors (such as relevant personal or family history, co-prescription of drugs that prolong QT intervals, or drugs that lower potassium levels). Refer to a cardiologist if abnormalities are detected.

Prolactin — then monitor at 6 months and yearly. Switch drugs if hyperprolactinaemia is confirmed and symptomatic.

Liver function tests — then monitor yearly. Stop the antipsychotic if liver function tests indicate liver damage.

Creatine phosphokinase — measure again only if neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is suspected.

Symptoms include hyperthermia, muscle rigidity, autonomic instability, and fluctuating consciousness.

Mortality without treatment is 20%; urgent medical treatment is therefore needed.

If the person has dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), monitor for severe untoward reactions, particularly neuroleptic sensitivity reactions (development or worsening of extrapyramidal features or acute, severe physical deterioration).

[National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007; Taylor et al, 2009]

Lorazepam

Lorazepam

Short-term treatment with lorazepam can be used in people with dementia who require immediate management of violence, aggression, or extreme agitation because they pose a risk to themselves or others.

The aim of drug treatment is to calm the person and reduce agitation or aggression; it is not to sedate.

Contraindications

Who should not receive lorazepam?

Severe hepatic impairment — lorazepam is contraindicated in severe hepatic impairment.

Lorazepam is also contraindicated in respiratory depression, marked neuromuscular respiratory weakness (including unstable myasthenia gravis), and sleep apnoea syndrome.

[BNF 58, 2009]

Dose

What dose of lorazepam is normally prescribed?

The recommended dose is 0.5 mg to 4 mg daily, in divided doses [Burns and Iliffe, 2009a].

Adverse effects

What adverse effects may occur with lorazepam?

Drowsiness and lightheadedness (usually occurs the next day), confusion, ataxia, and muscle weakness.

Occasionally, people may also experience headaches, vertigo, hypotension, salivation changes, gastrointestinal disturbances, tremor, incontinence, urinary retention, and jaundice.

[Genus Pharmaceuticals, 2004; BNF 58, 2009]

Interactions

What key drug interactions of lorazepam should I be aware of?

Alcohol should be avoided when taking lorazepam. Alcohol can increase the sedative effects of lorazepam.

Drugs that have a central nervous system (CNS) suppressant effect — additive CNS depressant effects occur when lorazepam is given with other medications that produce CNS depressant effects (such as barbiturates, antipsychotics, sedatives, antidepressants, sedative antihistamines, and anticonvulsants). Concomitant use is not recommended.

Haloperidol

Haloperidol

Short-term treatment with haloperidol can be used in people with dementia who require immediate management of violence, aggression, or extreme agitation because they pose a risk to themselves or others.

The aim of drug treatment is to calm the person and reduce agitation or aggression; it is not to sedate.

Contraindications

Who should not receive haloperidol?

Do not use haloperidol to treat mild-to-moderate psychotic symptoms in elderly people.

Haloperidol is contraindicated in comatose states, central nervous system depression, and in people with clinically significant cardiac disorders, such as:

Recent acute myocardial infarction.

Uncompensated heart failure or second- or third-degree heart block.

Arrhythmias treated with class IA antiarrhythmic drugs (for example disopyramide, procainamide, quinidine) or class III antiarrhythmic drugs (for example amiodarone, sotalol), or a history of ventricular arrhythmia or torsades de pointes.

QT interval prolongation.

Clinically significant bradycardia.

Uncorrected hypokalaemia.

[MHRA, 2008]

Dose

What dose of haloperidol is normally prescribed?

Haloperidol should be used at the minimum dose that is clinically effective [MHRA, 2008].

For agitation and restlessness in elderly people with dementia, prescribe 0.5 mg to 4 mg daily [Burns and Iliffe, 2009a].

Adverse effects

What adverse effects may occur with Haloperidol?

Extrapyramidal symptoms (Parkinsonism) are common, and are more likely and more severe in dementia with Lewy bodies and frontotemporal dementia. Acute dystonias may occur early in treatment. Tardive dyskinesia may develop during therapy or after the drug has been discontinued.

Hormonal effects of antipsychotic neuroleptic drugs include hyperprolactinaemia, which may cause galactorrhoea and gynaecomastia.

Cardiac adverse effects — dose-related hypotension is uncommon, but can occur, particularly in elderly people who are more susceptible to the sedative and hypotensive effects.

Gastrointestinal effects — nausea, loss of appetite, weight changes, and dyspepsia have been reported with haloperidol.

Other adverse effects — haloperidol may impair alertness, particularly with higher doses at the start of treatment, and may be potentiated by alcohol.

[MHRA, 2008; BNF 58, 2009]

Interactions

What key drug interactions of haloperidol should I be aware of?

Central nervous system (CNS) effects

Haloperidol can increase the CNS depression produced by other CNS depressant drugs (including alcohol, hypnotics, sedatives, and strong analgesics).

Tricyclic antidepressants

The metabolism of tricyclic antidepressants may be impaired by haloperidol.

Diuretics

Diuretics may cause hypokalaemia, which may increase the risk of arrhythmias; monitor potassium levels in people taking diuretics. For more information, see Drugs known to lower potassium levels.

Drugs that prolong the QT interval

Drugs that prolong the QT interval (such as antiarrhythmics, macrolides [for example erythromycin], and tricyclic antidepressants) may have a synergistic effect on the QT interval. Avoid co-prescribing drugs that prolong QT intervals.

Memantine hydrochloride

Memantine hydrochloride

Treatment with memantine is always initiated in secondary care by a specialist. However, treatment may be continued and monitored by a general practitioner under a shared care protocol [NICE, 2011b].

Contraindications

Contraindications

Memantine is contraindicated in people with severe hepatic impairment and in those with severe renal failure (eGFR less than 5 mL/minute/1.73m2).

Caution is recommended in people with a history of convulsions.

[ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2011; BNF 62, 2011]

Dose and titration

Dose and titration

The usual starting dose is 5 mg daily. The dose is usually titrated upwards weekly in steps of 5 mg until the maintenance dose is reached. The maximum dose is 20 mg daily.

The dose of memantine should be reduced in people with renal impairment:

If eGFR is 30–49 mL/minute/1.73 m2, the dose should be reduced to 10 mg daily; if well tolerated after at least 7 days the dose can be slowly increased to 20 mg daily.

If eGFR is 5–29 mL/minute/1.73 m2, the dose should be reduced to 10 mg daily.

[ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2011; BNF 62, 2011]

Adverse effects

Adverse effects

Memantine is generally well tolerated.

Common adverse effects include: dizziness, headache, constipation, dyspnoea, drowsiness, and constipation.

Less common adverse effects include: fungal infections, confusion, hallucinations, abnormal gait, cardiac failure, vomiting, fatigue, and venous thrombosis and thromboembolism.

Seizures, pancreatitis, depression, psychosis, and suicidal ideation have been rarely reported .

Ability to drive — memantine may have a minor or moderate influence on driving ability.

[ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2011; BNF 62, 2011]

Drug interactions

What key drug interactions of memantine should I be aware of?

There is an increased risk of central nervous system (CNS) toxicity when memantine is given with:

Ketamine

Dextromethorphan.

Dopaminergic drugs, selegiline, and amandatine.

Memantine possibly enhances the effect of warfarin and anticholinergics and possibly reduces the effect of antipsychotics, barbiturates, and hydrochlorothiazide.

Memantine may modify the effects of baclofen and dantrolene.

[ABPI Medicines Compendium, 2011; BNF 62, 2011]

Evidence

Evidence

Supporting evidence

This section summarizes the evidence that supports the use of drug treatments for challenging behaviour in people with dementia.

It does not summarize the evidence that supports the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors; because these are always started in secondary care.

Drug treatments

Evidence on drug treatments for behavioural and psychological symptoms

Benefits of antipsychotics

Evidence on benefits of antipsychotics for non-cognitive behavioural symptoms

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) found moderate-to-high quality evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two systematic reviews that antipsychotics result in small reductions in neuropsychiatric symptoms (psychosis, aggression, and agitation) in people with Alzheimer's disease or vascular dementia.

NICE conducted a systematic review regarding the efficacy of antipsychotics for non-cognitive symptoms of dementia [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

Atypical antipsychotics

NICE identified 13 placebo-controlled RCTs (in 4293 people) that assessed the efficacy of atypical antipsychotics for treating non-cognitive symptoms (psychosis, aggression, and agitation) in people with dementia. The outcomes included the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), NPI-Nursing Home (NPI-NH), and the Behavioural Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease (BEHAVE-AD) rating scale. When different measures were used to estimate the same underlying effect in different studies, the outcomes were reported in the systematic review as standardized mean differences (SMDs). The main finding was a consistent small reduction in the SMDs of NPI/NPI-NH/BEHAV-AD scores, which were statistically significant for aripiprazole and risperidone:

Aripiprazole 15 mg daily for 10 weeks: two RCTs (in 464 people), SMD –0.19 (95% CI –0.38 to –0.01).

Olanzapine 2.5 mg to 10 mg daily for 6–10 weeks: five RCTs (in 1862 people), SMD –0.09 (95% CI –0.23 to +0.05).

Risperidone 0.5 mg to 2 mg daily for 10–13 weeks: five RCTs (in 1905 people), SMD –0.33 (95% CI –0.47 to –0.20).

Except for risperidone, which may reduce aggression, there was no evidence that atypical antipsychotics had beneficial effects on individual symptoms such as aggression and agitation.

Typical antipsychotics

NICE identified two systematic reviews of placebo-controlled RCTs that assessed the efficacy of typical antipsychotics for treating non-cognitive symptoms (such as psychosis, aggression, and agitation) in people with dementia.

The first systematic review (search date: June 1989) identified seven placebo-controlled RCTs (in 252 people) comparing the efficacy of typical antipsychotics (haloperidol, thioridazine, thiothixene, chlorpromazine, trifluoperazine, acetophenazine) for agitation in people with dementia [Schneider et al, 1990]. Daily doses in chlorpromazine equivalents ranged from 75 mg to 267 mg. The main finding was a modest but statistically significant reduction in agitation (SMD –0.37, p = 0.004 [95% CI not reported]).

A further analysis of 11 RCTs comparing different antipsychotics found no clinically important difference between drugs.

A Cochrane systematic review (search date: April 2002) assessed the efficacy of haloperidol for agitation in people with dementia [Lonergan et al, 2002]. A further literature search in 2008 found no new evidence. The review's main findings were a statistically significant reduction in aggression, and non-significant reductions in behavioural symptoms and agitation. For haloperidol 1.2 mg to 3 mg daily, for 3–16 weeks: four RCTs (in 369 people):

Aggressive symptoms: SMD –0.31 (95% CI –0.49 to –0.13).

Behavioural symptoms: SMD –0.19 (95% CI –0.40 to +0.01).

Agitation: SMD –0.12 (95% CI –0.33 to +0.08).

A more recent review by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ, 2007] reported findings consistent with NICE.

Harms of antipsychotics

Evidence on harms of antipsychotics

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide good evidence that all antipsychotics increase the risk of stroke and mortality when used in elderly people with dementia. All antipsychotics appear to be associated with accelerated cognitive decline in people with Alzheimer's disease.

Risk of stroke

In 2004, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) advised there was an increased risk of stroke associated with the use of the atypical antipsychotics risperidone or olanzapine in elderly people with dementia [MHRA, 2004].

Four double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs (in 1779 people) found that atypical antipsychotics were associated with a three-fold increase in the risk of stroke (odds ratio [OR] 3.32, 95% CI 1.43 to 7.70).

Subsequently, in 2005, a Europe-wide review concluded that this risk could not be excluded for other antipsychotics (atypical or typical), and the product information for all antipsychotics was updated to include a class warning [Schneider et al, 2005].

Risk of mortality

CKS identified one well-conducted systematic review (search date: April 2005) of 15 double-blind RCTs (in 5110 people) that assessed the use of oral atypical antipsychotics in people with dementia, 87% with Alzheimer's disease [Schneider et al, 2005]. These studies lasted 10–12 weeks and included comparisons of aripiprazole (three trials), olanzapine (five trials), quetiapine (three trials), and risperidone (five trials) with placebo. Although nine of these studies were unpublished (posters and presentations), the quality of the studies was judged to be good.

Atypical antipsychotics compared with placebo

Death occurred more frequently among people randomized to antipsychotics (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.23). There was no statistically significant heterogeneity among the outcomes (I2 = 0%). The number needed to harm (NNTh) was 100 (95% CI 53 to 1000). This means that for about every 100 people with dementia treated with an atypical antipsychotic for 10–12 weeks, one death may occur.

The authors estimated that the benefit of antipsychotics in terms of the number needed to treat (NNTb) was between 4 and 12. That is, 4–12 people would need to be treated for one person to benefit.

Using the NNTh and NNTb estimates, the authors calculated that for every 9–25 people with dementia helped by an antipsychotic, there may be one death.

There was no evidence for any difference in this risk between individual atypical antipsychotics.

Haloperidol compared with placebo

Although it was not a planned analysis, the review found that haloperidol was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of death (OR 1.68, 95% CI 0.72 to 3.92).

Consistent results were found by a more recent systematic review of 17 RCTs (in 5106 people) that assessed the use of antipsychotics in elderly people with dementia [FDA, 2005]. Mortality was increased about 1.7-fold. The most common causes of death were heart-related events (such as heart failure, sudden death), or infections (usually pneumonia).

CKS identified two large cohort studies. Both found that the risk of death was increased in people with dementia who take typical or atypical antipsychotics; and that typical antipsychotics may entail a greater risk than atypical antipsychotics.

The first cohort study (in 27,259 people) examined the mortality of people older than 65 years of age with dementia who were taking atypical antipsychotics, and compared them with those who were not [Gill et al, 2007]. The risk of death was determined at 1 month, 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months.

Atypical antipsychotics compared with no use — atypical antipsychotics were associated with a significant increase in the risk of death at 30 days in the community-dwelling cohort (adjusted hazard ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.70) and the long-term care cohort (adjusted hazard ratio 1.55, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.07). This risk appeared to persist to 6 months.

Atypical antipsychotics compared with typical antipsychotics — typical antipsychotics were associated with a higher risk for death (at each time interval) compared with atypical antipsychotics. One month after starting an antipsychotic, the adjusted hazard ratio was 1.55 (95% CI 1.19 to 2.02) for the community-dwelling cohort and 1.26 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.53) for the long-term care cohort. This higher risk was also evident at 6 months (adjusted hazard ratios 1.23 [95% CI 1.00 to 1.50] and 1.27 [95% CI 1.09 to 1.48], respectively). Sensitivity analysis revealed that unmeasured confounders that increase the risk for death could diminish or eliminate the observed associations. Other limitations that may have affected the results include the fact that no information on causes of death was available, and many people did not continue their initial treatments after 1 month of treatment.

The second cohort study (in 37,241 people) compared the mortality of people older than 65 years of age taking typical and atypical antipsychotics. This study also found that the risk of death associated with typical antipsychotics was similar to, if not greater than, that associated with atypical antipsychotics [Schneeweiss et al, 2007].

Within 6 months of starting treatment, 1822 people (14.1%) taking a typical antipsychotic died, compared with 2337 people (9.6%) taking an atypical antipsychotic (mortality ratio 1.47, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.56). When this result was adjusted for confounders (using a multivariable Cox regression analysis) the mortality ratio was still higher for people taking typical antipsychotics (mortality ratio 1.32, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.42).

As with the first cohort study, there were a number of limitations that may have affected the results (for example the person's original diagnosis was not known, unmeasured confounders, non-consuming of prescribed antipsychotics).

Cognitive decline

One small observational study (in 71 people with dementia) found that, after 2 years of treatment, antipsychotics (thioridazine, promazine, haloperidol, and chlorpromazine) were associated with cognitive decline compared with people who did not take antipsychotics [McShane et al, 1997].

Cognitive function was measured using an expanded Mini-Mental State Examination. Scores of 25–30 out of 30 are considered normal, while 18–24 indicates mild-to-moderate impairment; scores of 17 or less indicate severe impairment.

At the end of 2 years, the reduction in cognitive function was 20.7 (standard error [SE] 2.9) for people who were given antipsychotics compared with 9.3 (SE 1.3) for people who did not take antipsychotics.

CKS identified a second small observational study that assessed the effect of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors on cognitive decline. However, because of methodological weaknesses, no meaningful conclusions could be drawn [Caballero et al, 2006].

CKS identified one small RCT and one small observational study that assessed the effect of antipsychotics on cognitive decline in people with dementia.

The RCT (in 93 people with dementia) randomized participants to quetiapine, rivastigmine, or placebo [Ballard et al, 2005]. The primary outcome measures were cognition (Severe Impairment Battery) and agitation (Cohen–Mansfield Agitation Inventory) after 6 weeks and 26 weeks of treatment. The main finding was that quetiapine was associated with a statistically significant decline in cognition:

Quetiapine — compared with placebo, the difference in change in the Severe Impairment Battery score (cognition) from baseline was: at 6 weeks –14.6 points (95% CI –25.3 to –4.0, p = 0.009) and at 26 weeks –15.4 points (95% CI –27.0 to –3.8, p = 0.01).

Rivastigmine — compared with placebo, the difference in change in the Severe Impairment Battery score (cognition) from baseline was: at 6 weeks –3.5 points (95% CI –13.1 to +6.2, p = 0.5) and at 26 weeks –7.5 points (95% CI –21.0 to +6.0, p = 0.3).

Compared with placebo, neither group showed significant differences in improvement on the agitation inventory (either at 6 weeks or 26 weeks).

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors

Evidence on acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for non-cognitive behavioural symptoms

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provides evidence that, in Alzheimer's disease, donepezil reduces non-cognitive behavioural symptoms. The results were inconclusive for galantamine and no trials were identified that assessed rivastigmine for this indication. The review found moderate-quality evidence that, in dementia with Lewy Bodies, rivastigmine may improve psychotic symptoms. The review found insufficient evidence to assess the effectiveness of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for reducing neuropsychiatric symptoms in people with vascular dementia.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) conducted a systematic review (search date: 2006) on the efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine) for non-cognitive symptoms of dementia [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007].

NICE identified 11 placebo-controlled RCTs that assessed, in people with dementia, the efficacy of donepezil, galantamine, or rivastigmine for non-cognitive symptoms (psychosis, aggression, and agitation). The main outcome measurement was the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), which was reported as the standardized mean difference (SMD).

Donepezil 10 mg daily, taken for 12–52 weeks by people with Alzheimer's disease: five RCTs (in 1082 people), SMD of the NPI score –0.31 (95% CI –0.45 to –0.18, statistically significant reduction).

Galantamine 24 mg daily, taken for 12–21 weeks by people with Alzheimer's disease: two RCTs (in 1364 people), SMD of the NPI score –0.13 (95% CI –0.27 to 0.00, not statistically significant).

NICE identified three further RCTs (in 1811 people) in which people with Alzheimer's disease received either donepezil or galantamine for 24 weeks. Compared with placebo, donepezil or galantamine statistically significantly reduced the SMD of the NPI score (–0.21, 95% CI –0.41 to –0.01). Results for individual drugs were not reported.

Rivastigmine taken by people with dementia with Lewy bodies: one RCT (in 120 people), SMD of the NPI score –0.28 (95% CI –0.67 to –0.12, statistically significant).

Search strategy

Scope of search

A full literature search was not required as this CKS topic is primarily based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline Dementia [National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2007], and the NICE technology appraisals on donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease [NICE, 2009]. It also takes into account of guidelines on dementia in people with learning disabilities [British Psychological Society, 2009]. Additional searches were requested for further evidence in the following areas:

Antipsychotics

Behavioural Problems

Exercise

Urinary and Faecal incontinence

Search dates

June 2006 – November 2009

Key search terms

Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline and these were adapted for other databases. Further details are available on request.

Dementia/, dementia.tw., alzheimer disease/, alzheimer's disease.tw.

Donepezil/, galantamine/, memantine/, rivastigmine/, benzodiazepines/, trazodone/, chlormethiazole., serationin uptake inhibitors/, fluoxetine/, citalopram/, sertraline/,

Antipsychotic agents/, antipsychotic$.tw., cognitive decline.tw.

Behavioural problems.tw., aggression.tw., sexual behaviour/, cholinesterase inhibitors/, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.tw., cholinesterase inhibitors.tw.,

Exercise/, exercise.tw.

Fecal incontinence/, urinary incontinence/, f*cal incontinence.tw., urinary incontinence.tw.

Table 1. Key to search terms.
Search commandsExplanation
/indicates a MeSh subject heading with all subheadings selected
.twindicates a search for a term in the title or abstract
expindicates that the MeSH subject heading was exploded to include the narrower, more specific terms beneath it in the MeSH tree
$indicates that the search term was truncated (e.g. wart$ searches for wart and warts)
Sources of guidelines

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)

National Guidelines Clearinghouse

New Zealand Guidelines Group

British Columbia Medical Association

Canadian Medical Association

Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement

Guidelines International Network

National Library of Guidelines

National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)

Alberta Medical Association

University of Michigan Medical School

Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium

Royal College of Nursing

Singapore Ministry of Health

Health Protection Agency

National Resource for Infection Control

CREST

World Health Organization

NHS Scotland National Patient Pathways

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

TRIP database

Patient UK Guideline links

UK Ambulance Service Clinical Practice Guidelines

RefHELP NHS Lothian Referral Guidelines

Medline (with guideline filter)

Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

The Cochrane Library:

Systematic reviews

Protocols

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects

Medline (with systematic review filter)

EMBASE (with systematic review filter)

Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals

NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme

The Cochrane Library:

NHS Economic Evaluations

Health Technology Assessments

Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health

International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment

Sources of randomized controlled trials

The Cochrane Library:

Central Register of Controlled Trials

Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)

EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)

Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries

Bandolier

Drug & Therapeutics Bulletin

MeReC

NPCi

BMJ Clinical Evidence

DynaMed

TRIP database

Central Services Agency COMPASS Therapeutic Notes

Sources of national policy

Department of Health

Sources of medicines information

The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.

British National Formulary (BNF)

electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC)

European Medicines Agency (EMEA)

LactMed

Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)

REPROTOX

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Stockley's Drug Interactions

TERIS

TOXBASE

Micromedex

UK Medicines Information

References

ABPI Medicines Compendium (2008) Summary of product characteristics for Risperdal tablets, liquid & quicklet. Electronic Medicines Compendium..Datapharm Communications Ltd.www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]

ABPI Medicines Compendium (2009a) Summary of product characteristics for Aricept. Electronic Medicines Compendium..Datapharm Communications Ltd.www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]

ABPI Medicines Compendium (2009b) Summary of product characteristics for Exelon. Electronic Medicines Compendium..Datapharm Communications Ltd.www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]

ABPI Medicines Compendium (2009c) Summary of product characteristics for Reminyl Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium..Datapharm Communications Ltd.www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]

ABPI Medicines Compendium (2009d) Summary of product characteristics for Ativan injection. Electronic Medicines Compendium..Datapharm Communications Lts.www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]

ABPI Medicines Compendium (2011) Summary of product characteristics for Ebixa 5mg/pump actuation oral solution, 20mg and 10 mg tablets and treatment initiation pack. Electronic Medicines Compendium..Datapharm Communications Ltd.www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]

AHRQ (2007) Efficacy and comparative effectiveness of off-label use of atypical antipsychotics. Comparative Effectiveness Review, No. 6..Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov [Free Full-text]

Alzheimer's Disease International (2011a) World Alzheimer Report 2011. The benefits of early diagnosis and intervention. Executive summary. ..Alzheimer's Disease International.www.alz.co.uk [Free Full-text]

Alzheimer's Disease International (2011b) World Alzheimer Report 2011. The benefits of early diagnosis and intervention. ..Alzheimer's Disease International.www.alz.co.uk [Free Full-text]

Alzheimer's Society (2007) Dementia UK: the full report. ..Alzheimer's Society.alzheimers.org.uk [Free Full-text]

Alzheimer's Society (2008) Dementia: management in primary care (CD-ROM). ..Alzheimer's Society. [Free Full-text]

Alzheimer's Society (2011) Optimising treatment and care for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. A best practice guide for health and social care professionals. ..Alzheimer's Society.alzheimers.org.uk [Free Full-text]

American Psychiatric Association (2007) Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. .2nd edn..www.psychiatryonline.com [Free Full-text]

Andel, R., Crowe, M., Pedersen, N.L. et al. (2008) Physical exercise at midlife and risk of dementia three decades later: a population-based study of Swedish twins. Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 63(1), 62-66. [Abstract]

Ballard, C., Margallo-Lana, M., Juszczak, E. et al. (2005) Quetiapine and rivastigmine and cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. BMJ 330(7496), 874. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Banerjee, S. (2009) The use of antipsychotic medication for people with dementia: time for action. ..Department of Health.www.dh.gov.uk [Free Full-text]

Baxter, K. (Ed.) (2008) Stockley's drug interactions: a source book of interactions, their mechanisms, clinical importance and management. 8th edn. London: Pharmaceutical Press.

Birks, J. (2006) Cholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease (Cochrane Review). .Issue 1.John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]

BMA (2007) Mental Capacity Act: guidance for GPs. ..British Medical Association.www.gp-training.net [Free Full-text]

BMA (2008) Mental Capacity Act tool kit: guidance from the British Medical Association. ..British Medical Association.www.bma.org.uk

BMA (2009) The Mental Capacity Act 2005: guidance for health professionals. ..British Medical Association.www.bma.org.uk

BMA and NHS Employers (2011) Summary of 2011/12 QOF indicator changes, points and thresholds. ..BMA and NHS Employers.www.nhsemployers.org [Free Full-text]

BMA and NHS Employers (2012) Quality and outcomes framework for 2012/13. Guidance for PCOs and practices. ..BMA and NHS Employers.www.bma.org.uk [Free Full-text]

BNF 58 (2009) British National Formulary. 58th edn. London: British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.

BNF 62 (2011) British National Formulary. 62nd edn. London: British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.

Borson, S., Scanlan, J., Brush, M. et al. (2000) The mini-cog: a cognitive 'vital signs' measure for dementia screening multi-lingual elderly. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 15(11), 1021-1027. [Abstract]

Boustani, M., Peterson, B., Hanson, L. et al. (2003) Screening for dementia in primary care: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine 138(11), 927-937. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

British Psychological Society (2009) Dementia and people with learning disabilities: guidance on the assessment, diagnosis, treatment and support of people with learning disabilities who develop dementia (CR155). ..British Psychological Society.www.rcpsych.ac.uk [Free Full-text]

Brodaty, H., Pond, D., Kemp, N.M. et al. (2002) The GPCOG: a new screening test for dementia designed for general practice. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 50(3), 530-534. [Abstract]

Brooke, P. and Bullock, R. (1999) Validation of a 6 item cognitive impairment test with a view to primary care usage. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 14(11), 936-940. [Abstract]

Brown, M. (2009a) Test your memory: the TYM test. British Medical Journal..British Medical Journal.www.bmj.com

Brown, M. (2009b) TYM scoring. British Medical Journal..British Medical Journal.www.bmj.com

Brown, J., Pengas, G., Dawson, K. et al. (2009) Self administered cognitive screening test (TYM) for detection of Alzheimer's disease: cross sectional study. BMJ 338, b2030. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Burns, A. and De Deyn, P.P. (2006) Risperidone for the treatment of neuropsychiatric features in dementia. Drugs and Aging 23(11), 887-896. [Abstract]

Burns, A. and Iliffe, S. (2009a) Dementia. BMJ 338, b75.

Burns, A. and Iliffe, S. (2009b) Alzheimer's disease. BMJ 338, b158.

Buschke, H., Kuslansky, G., Katz, M. et al. (1999) Screening for dementia with the memory impairment screen. Neurology 52(2), 231-238. [Abstract]

Caballero, J., Hitchcock, M., Scharre, D. et al. (2006) Cognitive effects of atypical antipsychotics in patients with Alzheimer's disease and comorbid psychiatric or behavioral problems: a retrospective study. Clinical Therapeutics 28(10), 1695-1700. [Abstract]

Canadian Study of Health and Aging (1994) The Canadian Study of Health and Aging: risk factors for Alzheimer's disease in Canada. Neurology 44(11), 2073-2080. [Abstract]

Chung-A-On, K. (2011) Personal communication. Scientific Advisor, Medical Affairs, Lundbeck Ltd: Milton Keynes.

Cooper, S-A (1997) High prevalence of dementia among people with learning disabilities not attributable to Down's syndrome. Psychological Medicine 27(3), 609-616. [Abstract]

Cooper, B. and Holmes, C. (1998) Previous psychiatric history as a risk factor for late-life dementia: a population-based case control-study. Age and Aging 27(2), 181-188. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Copeland, J.R.M., Davidson, I.A., Dewey, M.E. et al. (1992) Alzheimer's disease, other dementias, depression and pseudodementia: prevalence, incidence and three-year outcome in Liverpool. British Journal of Psychiatry 161(2), 230-239. [Abstract]

Department for Constitutional Affairs (2007) Mental capacity act 2005: code of practice. ..The Stationary Office.www.dca.gov.uk [Free Full-text]

DH (2007) Who cares? Information and support for the carers of people with dementia. ..Department of Health.www.dh.gov.uk [Free Full-text]

DH (2008a) End of life care strategy: promoting high quality care for all adults at the end of life. ..Department of Health.www.dh.gov.uk [Free Full-text]

DH (2008b) Carers at the heart of 21st-century families and communities: "A caring system on your side. A life of your own": summary. ..Department of Health.www.dh.gov.uk [Free Full-text]

DH (2009a) Living well with dementia: a national dementia strategy. ..Department of Health.www.dh.gov.uk [Free Full-text]

DH (2009b) Making decisions: the Independent Mental Capacity Advocate (IMCA) service. ..Department of Health.www.dh.gov.uk [Free Full-text]

DH (2009c) Government response to Professor Sube Banerjee's report of the prescribing of anti-psychotic drugs to people with dementia. ..Department of Health.www.dh.gov.uk [Free Full-text]

Dubois, B., Feldmann, H.H., Jacova, C. et al. (2007) Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: revising the NINCDS—ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurology 6(8), 734-746. [Abstract]

DVLA (2010) At a glance guide to the current medical standards of fitness to drive (August update). ..Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency.www.dvla.gov.uk [Free Full-text]

End of Life Care Programme (2008) Advance care planning: a guide for health and social care staff. ..End of Life Care Programme.www.endoflifecare.nhs.uk

FDA (2005) Deaths with antipsychotics in elderly patients with behavioral disturbances. ..US Food and Drug Administration.www.fda.gov

Fratiglioni, L., Wang, H.X., Ericsson, K. et al. (2000) Influence of social network on occurrence of dementia: a community-based longitudinal study. Lancet 355(9212), 1315-1319. [Abstract]

General Medical Council (2009) Withholding and withdrawing - guidance for doctors. ..General Medical Council.www.gmc-uk.org [Free Full-text]

Genus Pharmaceuticals (2004) Summary of product characteristics Lorazepam 1mg. ..Genus Pharmaceuticals.www.genuspharma.com

Gill, S.S., Bronskill, S.E., Normand, S.L. et al. (2007) Antipsychotic drug use and mortality in older adults with dementia. Annals of Internal Medicine 146(11), 775-786. [Abstract]

Gitlin, L.N., Winter, L., Corcoran, M. et al. (2003) Effects of the home environmental skill-building program on the caregiver-care recipient dyad: 6- month outcomes from the Philadelphia REACH Initiative. Gerontologist 43(4), 532-546. [Abstract]

Harlow, W. (2009) Prevention and management of violence and aggression - promoting safe and therapeutic services in older people's mental health. ..National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]

Herrmann, N., Mamdani, M. and Lanctôt, K.L. (2004) Atypical antipsychotics and risk of cerebrovascular accidents. American Journal of Psychiatry 161(6), 1113-1115. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Iliffe, S., Jain, P., Wong, G. et al. (2009a) Dementia diagnosis in primary care: thinking outside the educational box. Aging Health 5(1), 51-59.

Iliffe, S., Jain, P. and Wilcock, J. (2009b) Recognition of and response to dementia syndrome in primary care: part 1. InnovAiT 2(4), 230-236.

Iliffe, S., Jain, P. and Wilcock, J. (2009c) Recognition of and response to dementia syndrome in primary care: part 2. InnovAiT 2(4), 237-244.

Ismail, Z., Rajji, T.K. and Shulman, K.I. (2009) Brief cognitive screening instruments: an update. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 25(2), 111-120. [Abstract]

Knapp, M., Thorgrimsen, L., Patel, A. et al. (2006) Cognitive stimulation therapy for people with dementia: cost-effectiveness analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry 188(6), 574-580. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Larson, E.B., Wang, L., Bowen, J.D. et al. (2006) Exercise is associated with reduced risk for incident dementia among persons 65 years of age and older. Annals of Internal Medicine 144(2), 73-81. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Lonergan, E., Luxenberg, J., Colford, J.M. and Birks, J. (2002) Haloperidol for agitation in dementia (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library.Issue 2.John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]

Luengo-Fernandez, R., Leal, J., and Gray, A. (2010) Dementia 2010: the economic burden of dementia and associated research funding the United Kingdom. ..Alzheimer's Research Trust.www.dementia2010.org [Free Full-text]

McCarthy, M., Addington-Hall, J. and Altmann, D. (1997) The experience of dying with dementia: a retrospective study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 12(3), 404-409. [Abstract]

McKeith, I.G., Dickson, D.W., Lowe, J. et al. (2005) Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: third report of the DLB consortium. Neurology 65(12), 1863-1872. [Abstract]

McShane, R., Keene, J., Gedling, K. et al. (1997) Do neuroleptic drugs hasten cognitive decline in dementia? Prospective study with necropsy follow up. British Medical Journal 314(7076), 266-270. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

MHRA (2004) Summary of clinical trial data on cerebrovascular adverse events (CVAEs) in randomized clinical trials of risperidone conducted in patients with dementia. ..Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency.www.mhra.gov.uk [Free Full-text]

MHRA (2008) Haloperidol 0.5mg, 1.5mg, 5mg, 10mg and 20mg tablets PL 04416/0531-5. ..Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.www.mhra.gov.uk [Free Full-text]

MHRA (2009) Antipsychotics: use in elderly people with dementia. Drug Safety Update 2(8), 5-6. [Free Full-text]

Middleton, L.E., Mitnitski, A., Fallah, N. et al. (2008) Changes in cognition and mortality in relation to exercise in late life: a population based study. PLoS ONE 3(9), e3124. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Mitchell, A.J. and Shiri-Feshki, M. (2009) Rate of progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia - meta-analysis of 41 robust inception cohort studies. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 119(4), 252-265. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Moore, A.R. and O'Keefe, S.T. (1999) Drug-induced cognitive impairment in the elderly. Drugs & Aging 15(1), 15-28. [Abstract]

National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (2007) Dementia (full NICE guideline). .Clinical guideline 42.The British Psychological Society & the Royal College of Psychiatrists.www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]

Neary, D., Snowden, J. and Mann, D. (2005) Frontotemporal dementia. Lancet Neurology 4(11), 771-780. [Abstract]

NICE (2004) Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer (NICE guideline). Guidance on Cancer Services..National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]

NICE (2006) Dementia: quick reference guide. ..National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]

NICE (2009) Donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine (review) and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (amended) (NICE technology appraisal 111). ..National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]

NICE (2010) NICE quality standards. ..National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]

NICE (2011a) Donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (NICE technology appraisal 217). ..National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]

NICE (2011b) Dementia: quick reference guide (revised March 2011). ..National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]

NICE (2013) Key therapeutic topics - medicines management options for local implementation. ..National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]

Nicholson, T.R., Cutter, W. and Hotopf, M (2008) Assessing mental capacity: the Mental Capacity Act. BMJ 336(7639), 322-325.

NPC (2011) Key therapeutic topics 2010/11 - Medicines management options for local implementation. ..National Prescribing Centre.www.npc.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]

NPC (2012) Key therapeutic topics - medicines management options for local implementation. ..National Prescribing Centre.www.npc.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]

O'Brien, J.T., Erkinjuntti, T., Reisberg, B. et al. (2003) Vascular cognitive impairment. Lancet Neurology 2(2), 89-98. [Abstract]

Office of the Public Guardian (2005) The Mental Capacity Act: making decisions. A guide for people who work in health and social care. ..Office of the Public Guardian. [Free Full-text]

Petrova, M., Dale, J. and Fulford, K.W.M. (2006) Values-based practice in primary care: easing the tensions between individual values, ethical principles and best evidence. British Journal of General Practice 56(530), 703-709. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Prasher, V.P. (1995) Age-specific prevalence, thyroid dysfunction and depressive symptomatology in adults with Down's syndrome and dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 10(1), 25-31.

RCGP (2007a) Care of older adults (curriculum statement 9). ..Royal College of General Practitioners.

RCGP (2007b) Care of people with mental health problems (curriculum statement 13). ..Royal College of General Practitioners.

RCGP (2007c) Care of people with cancer and palliative care (curriculum statement 12). ..Royal College of General Practitioners.

RCGP (2007d) Clinical ethics and values-based practice (curriculum statement 3.3). ..Royal College of General Practitioners.

Rovio, S., Kareholt, I., Helkala, E-L. et al. (2005) Leisure-time physical activity at midlife and the risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Lancet Neurology 4(11), 705-711. [Abstract]

Schmand, B., Smit, J.H., Geerlings, M.I. and Lindeboom, J. (1997) The effects of intelligence and education on the development of dementia. A test of the brain reserve hypothesis. Psychological Medicine 27(6), 1337-1344. [Abstract]

Schneeweiss, S., Setoguchi, S., Brookhart, A. et al. (2007) Risk of death associated with the use of conventional versus atypical antipsychotic drugs among elderly patients. CMAJ 176(5), 627-632. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Schneider, L.S., Pollock, V.E. and Lyness, S.A. (1990) A meta-analysis of controlled trials of neuroleptic treatment in dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 38(5), 553-563. [Abstract]

Schneider, L.S., Dagerman, K.S. and Insel, P. (2005) Risk of death with atypical antipsychotic drug treatment for dementia: meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Journal of the American Medical Association 294(15), 1934-43. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Snowdon, D.A., Kemper, S.J., Mortimer, J.A. et al. (1996) Linguistic ability in early life and cognitive function and Alzheimer's disease in late life. Findings from the Nun Study. Journal of the American Medical Association 275(7), 528-832. [Abstract]

Spector, A., Thorgrimsen, L., Woods, B. et al. (2003) Efficacy of an evidence-based cognitive stimulation therapy programme for people with dementia: randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 183(3), 248-254. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Sumic, A., Michael, Y.L., Carlson, N.E. et al. (2007) Physical activity and the risk of dementia in oldest old. Journal of Aging and Health 19(2), 242-59. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Taylor, D., Paton, C. and Kapure, S. (2009) The Maudsley prescribing guidelines. London: Informa Healthcare.

Verghese, J., Katz, M.J., Hall, C.B. et al. (2003) Leisure activities and the risk of dementia in the elderly. New England Journal of Medicine 348(25), 2508-2516. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

Wang, H-X., Karp, A., Winblad, B. and Fratiglioni, L. (2002) Late-life engagement in social and leisure activities is associated with a decreased risk of dementia: a longitudinal study from the Kungsholmen project. American Journal of Epidemiology 155(12), 1081-1087. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]

WHO (2007) International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems: 10th revision. ..World Health Organisation.www.who.int [Free Full-text]

Zhang, M.Y., Katzman, R., Salmon, D. et al. (1990) The prevalence of dementia and Alzheimer's disease in Shanghai, China: impact of age, gender, and education. Annals of Neurology 27(4), 428-437. [Abstract]